Channel
@vlad007
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
234subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002155251990 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @aslam @blockhead @danisa @supra @vlad007 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vlad007 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 234 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 234 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 236 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 236 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 236 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 236 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 235 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 235 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 235 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 January 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 200 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
115 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5452055425690123301 | 41 | 35.7% | |
| custom 5438249300561792814 | 34 | 29.6% | |
| custom 5312359316580216113 | 11 | 9.57% | |
| custom 5359388675895467568 | 11 | 9.57% | |
| custom 5350519289256355751 | 10 | 8.70% | |
| custom 5352784961814405440 | 5 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5359601641848840128 | 3 | 2.61% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I've spent the past month thinking about this from every angle. And this is the conclusion I've reached. Don't play the game you wish existed. Play the game that actually exists. The more I observe people, companies, markets, and the way the world works, the more convinced I become of one simple idea. Most problems don't exist because a system is broken. They exist because people misunderstand how the system actuall…
Everything in this life is an exchange. 💱 Time for money, money for time, goods, services, emotions. It's all built on that.
I rarely talk about the crypto market as a whole, but today I want to share some thoughts on Bitcoin 💰 . The current situation is extremely interesting, and I'm watching it closely. According to CryptoQuant, overall Bitcoin demand has fallen to its weakest level of the current cycle, with a decline of roughly 501,000 BTC. Around 272,000 BTC comes from the spot market and another 229,000 BTC from futures markets. Many…
custom 545205542569012330117custom 54382493005617928142
@BOSS 4 hours ago, this username was purchased for 500 000 USDT. It will be more interesting later 🎂
custom 54520554256901233013custom 54382493005617928142custom 53505192892563557511
I am sure that when the purchase of collectible numbers and usernames through USDT is implemented on Fragment, then simple collectible numbers will cost more than $10,000-$20,000. 💸📱👍 +888 0101 0202- 1 000 000 usdt +888 0303 3333- 1 000 000 usdt +888 0000 0103- 300 000 usdt @makita- 1 000 000 usdt @metabo- 1 000 000 usdt @ryobi- 500 000 usdt @supra- 100 000 usdt @hazet- 100 000 usdt If these assets are sold at the…
custom 53593886758954675685custom 53505192892563557514custom 54520554256901233014
https://t.me/TGcollectors/122 🔥🔥🔥
custom 54382493005617928146custom 53123593165802161133custom 53505192892563557512custom 53596016418488401281
On sale: +888 0303 3333 +888 0101 0202 +888 0000 0103 +888 0304 3333 Very rare! They have never been on accounts or sold! +888 0055 3535 +888 0101 7171 +888 0202 9595 +888 0932 1646
custom 54382493005617928148custom 54520554256901233016custom 53527849618144054403
🩸
The plan has been exceeded! For the 2nd month of 2026, the transaction for the username is more than $ 2,200,000. Unbelievably 💸
custom 53527849618144054402
Are you following this battle? @danbao Already more than: 2️⃣ 0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣💲
custom 53123593165802161138custom 54382493005617928141
I'm really enjoying what's happening! 🤑 This is the crypt, this is the volatility on which millions of dollars are earned!👍
custom 54382493005617928146custom 53505192892563557513custom 54520554256901233012custom 53596016418488401281
🩸 Blood. +888 And in anonymous numbers, everything is stable +- $2 500 My offers 👉 https://getgems.io/vlad007
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vlad007. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,251,050 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vlad007 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vlad007 🎱|TON/Rare&VIP Anonymous Numbers/Telegram Gifts” (@vlad007), 234 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vlad007.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.