Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Проект «Включи смыслы»

Channel

Проект «Включи смыслы»

@vklychismisly

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,122subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001862374223
TypeChannel
Username@vklychismisly
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vklychismisly

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

1,540 average views per post against 1,122 subscribers — an engagement rate of 136.8%. Across the 51,499 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.2% and 34.5%, with a median of 19.4%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (16 July 2026 15 August 2026)
Posts measured14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled21,490
Mature posts only136.8% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers1,122 measured 13 August 2026
Cohortb1000:rus · 51,499 channels · p10 5.18% · p25 10.2% · p50 19.4% · p75 34.5% · p90 55.0%
Position in cohort99.049th percentile · 7.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.262% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,1221,1271,124.57 August 2026 — 1,127 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,127 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,124 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,122 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,121–1,128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:041,122-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:311,124-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:561,127no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:461,127first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
136.8%
avg views ÷ 1,122 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (12 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total21,490
Reactions total1,917
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,297 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
53623.3%
🔥46120.1%
🎉45219.7%
👏43318.9%
👍41017.8%
💯20.087%
10.044%
❤‍🔥10.044%
🆒10.044%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,297reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC≈1,530 views129 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда мы начали придумывать первую Летнюю лабораторию, стало понятно: мы точно не хотим делать ещё одну лекцию. И даже ещё один красивый бизнес-завтрак. Потому что знания сегодня найти несложно. Гораздо сложнее понять: как звучит именно ваш проект для других людей. 🟡Можно месяцами дорабатывать сайт. 🟡Переписывать описание услуг. 🟡Придумать новую самопрезентацию. Но есть один вопрос, на который невозможно ответить

32🔥30👏28👍22🎉17

4 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,330 views141 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Кажется, ещё никогда у экспертов и предпринимателей не было столько возможностей рассказывать о себе и своих проектах 😎 За несколько минут можно придумать тему поста, собрать презентацию, написать сценарий видео, создать фотографии и подготовить контент на неделю вперёд. Инструментов становится всё больше. Но означает ли это, что людям стало проще понять, чем именно вы можете быть полезны? На днях мне нужно было р

33👍28🔥28🎉27👏23💯2

3 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC≈1,320 views141 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Этим летом во «Включи смыслы» появляется новый формат — Летняя лаборатория 🙂💡 Серия камерных практикумов для экспертов, предпринимателей и руководителей, которым важно не только узнавать новое, но и сразу применять это в жизни и работе. Почему лаборатория? Потому что здесь мы не будем просто слушать лекции. Мы будем исследовать 🤩 ✅Проверять идеи на практике. ✅Работать в командах. ✅Получать честную обратную связь. ✅

👏34🔥30🎉2726👍24

31 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,490 views149 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Увидели отметку нашего проекта и прочитали пост 😉📖 Пост участницы нашей практической рубрики #от_идеи_к_результату. И подумали о том, что рубрики во «Включи смыслы» никогда не заканчиваются публикацией последнего поста. Это только начало 🙂 За несколько лет мы создали уже более 70 практических рубрик с предпринимателями, психологами, финансистами, инвесторами, руководителями, специалистами по публичным выступлениям

41👏32🎉30👍28🔥17❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC≈1,310 views120 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#заметки_основателя Сообщение от участника форум-группы: «Вспомнил нашу встречу и увидел такую огромную ценность теплоты и комфорта, которая создаётся в нашей группе. Это так для меня ценно». Вчера состоялась уже четвёртая встреча нашей #форум_группа. На этот раз неформальная: прогулка, разговоры, время вместе. И особенно ценно было то, что каждый нашёл для неё время 🙂 Потому что форум-группа — это не разовое меро

31👏27🎉25🔥22👍15

27 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,710 views145 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что сегодня происходит во «Включи смыслы» 😀 Несколько дней назад мы пересматривали последние публикации канала: 🟡Рубрика «От идеи к результату». 🟡Поздравление Сергея. 🟡Закулисье проекта. 🟡Новые партнёрства. 🟡Подготовка августовских событий. И поняли: важно рассказать чем сейчас живут «Включи смыслы»🕵️ В этом году важной частью нашей работы стали проекты с врачами и экспертами в сфере здоровья: рубрика #диалог_с_вр

👍35🔥3431🎉25👏20

24 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,280 views123 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#команда_@vklychismisly За каждым проектом всегда стоят люди. Те, кто придумывает. Задает вопросы. Предлагает решения. Замечает детали, которые могут изменить всё. Сегодня день рождения у Сергея Казымова @skazymov — человека, который уже много лет является важной частью команды «Включи смыслы» 🤩 За эти годы мы вместе придумали десятки проектов, новые форматы мероприятий и огромное количество решений, которые обыч

33🎉29👍22🔥21👏18

23 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,510 views118 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А вы в Москве в августе? ☀️ Кажется, нас ждёт очень интересный месяц 🙂 Сейчас мы вместе с партнёрами создаём сразу два новых офлайн-события для «Включи смыслы». И знаете, какой вопрос мы задаём себе чаще всего? «А мы сами захотели бы прийти на такую встречу?» Если ответ не «Да!», значит, продолжаем думать дальше. Поэтому сейчас мы продумываем не только тему, но и всё, что создаёт впечатление от встречи: интеракти

👏31🔥2624🎉24👍12🆒1

22 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC≈2,520 views232 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#заметки_основателя Вчера завершилась наша рубрика #от_идеи_к_результату. Целый месяц мы вместе с Дианой Зверевой @DianaZvereva1 помогали участникам посмотреть на свои идеи как на проекты: увидеть их ценность, собрать структуру, не остановиться после первых шагов и понять, куда двигаться дальше. А завершили этот путь живым разбором проектов Ирины и Елены. Каждая из них взяла для себя конкретные шаги после нашей вс

🔥5352👍44🎉42👏401

21 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC≈1,360 views130 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#от_идеи_к_результату: что происходит, когда перестаёшь оставаться с проектом один на один? В течение июля мы вместе разбирались, почему хорошие идеи иногда так и остаются в заметках. Искали ответы, смотрели на свои проекты с разных сторон, задавали вопросы, на которые не всегда получается ответить самому. Финалом рубрики стал открытый разбор двух проектов. И именно там ещё раз подтвердилась мысль, ради которой мы

37🎉31👍23👏21🔥18

17 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,440 views140 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За последние недели мы вместе прошли большой путь. 😀От идеи. К первым шагам. 🚀От вопросов. К решениям. Спасибо каждому, кто стал частью рубрики #от_идеи_к_результату 🙂 Делился своими проектами, сомнениями и открытиями. За это время у нас получилось создать пространство, где можно было посмотреть на свой проект немного шире. И нам очень хочется продолжить этот разговор 🙂 📅 20 июля в 19:00 мы встретимся в Zoom. 🌟

🔥3229🎉28👍27👏24

17 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,550 views129 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Согласна с этой схемой пути на 💯% Сделала себе напоминание: 1. фокус делать на своём проекте 2. сравнивать что есть на рынке с пониманием, что я в начале пути, другие уже работают долгое время! 3. не шагать семимильными шагами сразу и не требовать от себя сразу крутых результатов. Бережно к себе. Продолжая фразу: я реализую то, во что верю и в чём вижу смысл!

👏3431🔥24🎉22👍18

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @vklychismisly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 18,840 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Проект «Включи смыслы»” (@vklychismisly), 1,122 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vklychismisly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.