Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

vjkeey’🍓

@vjkeey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,091subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001182373122
TypeChannel
Username@vjkeey
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vjkeey

Growth

2,0912,0982,094.58 August 2026 — 2,096 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,098 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,091 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,090–2,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:422,091-7
9 Aug 2026, 01:402,098+2
8 Aug 2026, 03:482,096first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.0%
avg views ÷ 2,091 subscribers
Avg views / post
983
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total16,704
Reactions total2,775
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 46s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,775 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 537997784716939329235312.7%
custom 522212608666555975930411.0%
custom 54408162822555301172739.84%
custom 54474264774422415262328.36%
custom 54407604219108791572248.07%
custom 53573988433170667802177.82%
custom 54655659282195000612007.21%
custom 52357868314459230001936.95%
custom 53121114454276455011916.88%
custom 53121047839333689701856.67%
custom 53980793519105783181495.37%
custom 5222435062317864441682.45%
custom 5445211253570033902672.41%
custom 5235496951218202860461.66%
custom 5467658500710616118411.48%
custom 5467817251291813208321.15%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,775reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vjkeey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈1,390 views163 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

i know, you know, we know.

custom 5222126086665559759108custom 523549695121820286039custom 544521125357003390214custom 52224350623178644412

7 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC704 views163 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

??!

custom 522212608666555975998custom 522243506231786444134custom 544521125357003390227custom 52354969512182028604

7 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC746 views158 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тэхён промаргивается, как будто приходит в себя, видит перед собой начальника, господина Чона, который снова ковыряет его душу одним своим взглядом. Он дёргается и уже делает шаг в сторону, осознав, к чему всё идёт, но, видимо, слишком плохо старается. Тэхён чуть ли не тонет в рубашках, когда его горячо целуют, не давая сбежать. Он не теряет разум, всего лишь ждёт, пока господин Чон наиграется. Тэхён даже не закрывае

custom 522212608666555975998custom 522243506231786444132custom 544521125357003390225custom 52354969512182028603

7 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC736 views222 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

вкусняшки ;)

custom 5447426477442241526148custom 546765850071061611841custom 546781725129181320832custom 54452112535700339021

6 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC813 views122 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

дроп тэхена напомнил мне об этом видео..

custom 537997784716939329279custom 544081628225553011737custom 54474264774422415266

6 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC826 views159 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

😙.

custom 5357398843317066780121custom 544742647744224152618custom 544081628225553011713custom 53799778471693932927

6 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC847 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026

почему у энхайпен каждый день как судный.. я все еще мечтаю попасть на их концерт, что за массовые отмены?

custom 537997784716939329248custom 53573988433170667808

5 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC975 views244 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐻: гора эверест на фоне меня…

custom 5379977847169393292168custom 535739884331706678057custom 544081628225553011719

5 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,990 views267 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

и я в него влюблен, но не могу сказать люблю’

custom 5440816282255530117160custom 544742647744224152650custom 537997784716939329243custom 535739884331706678014

5 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC918 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 544081628225553011723custom 535739884331706678010custom 53799778471693932928

5 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC909 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 544081628225553011721custom 544742647744224152610custom 53573988433170667807

5 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC909 views124 reactionsread 8 August 2026

кажется сегодня будет доза)

custom 531210478393336897077custom 546556592821950006128custom 531211144542764550119

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @vjkeey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 580,825 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vjkeey’🍓” (@vjkeey), 2,091 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vjkeey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.