Реклама / Вп Оп: @monamourprice
Безупречные манеры и легкий дым загадочности, как хитрый кот в полумраке – незаметен, но ты всё равно смотришь и ждёшь меня. Без лишнего шума, без скандалов. Просто присутствие, которое невозможно игнорировать.
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,074–9,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 17:43
9,083
-61
9 Aug 2026, 01:40
9,144
+26
8 Aug 2026, 03:46
9,118
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
53.2%
avg views ÷ 9,083 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,830
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
21 (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
96,647
Reactions total
2,800
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
69
Videos
186
Links
165
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8m 35s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,871 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5188357645035150149
733
25.5%
custom 5190786028134246137
570
19.9%
custom 5190852630192100042
516
18.0%
custom 5190622651873271466
514
17.9%
custom 5188326781400163051
388
13.5%
custom 5201675651425277065
150
5.22%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,871reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 21 we hold a reading for · 48%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @virt_mrm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Что-то придёт через 12 дней.
Включите чёртовые уведомления для этого предстоящего события.
А все неважные посты и рекламные публикации будут выходить без звука, чтобы лишний раз вас не беспокоить.
Так что на это событие уведомления включить обязательно.
«Безумец» 1/2
— Ты где? Почему так поздно?
— Время пришло, Тэ. Я жду тебя
🔽Продолжение внизу.🔽
Вашему вниманию представляю нового милого амбассадора моей студии — Круглика.
Визуальная часть зарисовки — её.
Озвучка — моя.
«Друг вдруг между ног » 1/3
— Но почему кокос?
Чонгук не ответил сразу. Вместо этого он тянется к столику, берет тюбик и откручивает крышку. Слабый, сладковатый, дурманящий аромат кокоса моментально смешался с полумраком комнаты. Чон выдавил немного прозрачного геля на свои горячие ладони, растирая его с неспешным, почти ритуальным удовольствием.
«Потому что ты всегда пахнешь этим мылом, когда выходишь из моего душа……
📷📷📷возьмите, пожалуйста,
📷📷📷свои маски. в вирт без
🖤🖤🖤них вход воспрещён😈
крупнейшие каналы владельцев Kaizen, Пленитель и Mr. Q объединились, чтобы создать одно большое пространство для виртовских и не только. Здесь можно найти новых людей, приятное общение и свой круг.
🙂добро пожаловать — ссылка.
На протяжении минуты вы увидите как они ебут мозги друг друга.😇
Представляю вам новую рубрику: 🎤«Озвучка Пленитель Core».
В этом видео были четыре разные истории:
📤Стриптизер.
📤Бывшие друзья с привилегиями.
📤Презерватив.
📤Бывший.
Если хотите посмотреть каждую историю целиком, они уже ждут вас здесь.
А какое видео от меня ваше любимое? Возможно, оно попадет во вторую часть этой рубрики.)
«Под знаком Посейдона»
Визуал от моего комфортного амбассадора Бэмби.
Спойлер: Капитан Чонгук всего лишь попросил Тэхёна не пить вино, чтобы у того опять не раскололась голова после похмелья. Но Тэхён (накрученный Чимином) решил, что это суровый приказ: «Не смей напиваться, трахаться будем на трезвую». В итоге парень на весь ресторан признаётся, что ради него заранее всё себе растянул в душе. Чонгук чуть не подавился…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @virt_mrm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@virt_mrm edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 168,270 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐌𝐎𝐍 𝐀𝐌𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐕𝐈𝐑𝐓” (@virt_mrm), 9,083 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/virt_mrm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.