Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🍒 Переходник 🍒

Channel

🍒 Переходник 🍒

@vjazanie_otkutur

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

-13,060 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001910660443
TypeChannel
Username@vjazanie_otkutur
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vjazanie_otkutur

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

413,1366,5707 August 2026 — 13,064 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,065 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,068 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,072 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,073 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,076 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,074 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,076 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,075 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,079 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,081 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,080 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,084 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,087 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,091 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,093 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,090 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,088 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,091 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,090 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,089 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,093 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,092 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,102 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,103 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,136 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 39 days, net -13,060. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 23:174-13,132
13 Sept 2026, 11:5513,136+33
11 Sept 2026, 15:4013,103+1
8 Sept 2026, 23:3713,102+10
5 Sept 2026, 15:3813,092-1
3 Sept 2026, 17:4113,093+4
30 Aug 2026, 07:4713,089-1
29 Aug 2026, 07:1713,090-1
28 Aug 2026, 06:0313,091+3
27 Aug 2026, 07:5413,088-2
26 Aug 2026, 11:1613,090-3
25 Aug 2026, 11:2913,093+2
24 Aug 2026, 09:3913,091+4
21 Aug 2026, 10:0713,087+3
20 Aug 2026, 10:2413,084+4
19 Aug 2026, 11:1313,080-1
18 Aug 2026, 12:5413,081+2
16 Aug 2026, 03:1613,079+4
14 Aug 2026, 14:3413,075-1
13 Aug 2026, 02:1713,076first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18316.7%
avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
Avg views / post
733
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held83 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total17,584
Reactions total235
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

786 reactions across 83 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍48661.8%
❤25933.0%
🔥212.67%
👏91.15%
👌40.509%
🤔30.382%
🤨20.254%
✍10.127%
🤣10.127%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 786 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.20%
1 of 83 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
570
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
760
over 82 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGjAUSd112 August 202612 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:44 UTC431 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Этот ажурный отлично смотрится и на джемпере, и на кардигане❤️

❤6👍3🤨2

2 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC601 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Интересный ажурный узор и примеры его вязания

❤4👍4👏1

2 Sept 2026, 03:33 UTC586 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Добротный теплый длинный кардиган (или вязаное пальто)

👍7

1 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC713 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Джемпер Ammie. МАТЕРИАЛЫ: пряжа АLРАККА МАGIС (63 % альпаки, 37 % полиамида, 50 грамм/150 метров) - по7(8) 8 (9)10 мотков, цвет Sjogronn №324. Спицы круговые и чулочные №6 и №8

👍9

1 Sept 2026, 05:43 UTC764 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Размеры: 44/46 (48). Пряжа: 400 (450) г пряжи Спинка: на спицы № 3 набрать 80 (86) п. и связать для планки 4 см резинкой 1х1. В последнем изн. ряду прибавить 1 п. Перейти на спицы № 3,5 и вязать узором по схеме, распределяя петли следующим образом: 44-46 размер: 5 п. перед раппортом по схеме, 7 раппортов, 6 п. после раппорта по схеме. 48 размер: 1 кр.п, 3 изн. п., 4 п. перед раппортом по схеме, 7 раппортов, 5 п. по…

❤7👍5

31 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC846 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Описание вязания. Вяжем джемпер «Соблазн».

🔥6👍2❤1

31 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC793 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Пуловер с рельефным узором.

❤8👍2

30 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC875 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Классический свитер с косами и аранами цвета глубокого индиго. Слегка облегающий силуэт, длина модели чуть ниже пояса, узкий втачной рукав, круглый вырез горловины и ворот-стойка с оригинальной резинкой из жгутов.Для вязания нам потребуется 6 мотков — на размер 44-46 — синей пряжи: 50% мериносовая шерсть, 50% акрил; 100 гр — 300 м. Спицы № 3-3,5, а также вспомогательная спица для кос.

❤4👍1🤔1

30 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC782 views6 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

❗Девочки! Схемы лучших жилетов с косами и жгутами можно ЗАБИРАТЬ СЕЙЧАС В ВАШУ КОПИЛКУ на канале Стильное вязание, Схемы На канале только самые красивые и стильные модели свитеров, топов и КАРДИГАНОВ в каталогах, которые публикуются каждый день на канале 10 новых идей каждый день! ПЕРЕХОДИ, СОХРАНЯЙ, ПОДПИШИСЬ ✅

❤5👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @vjazanie_otkutur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Стильное вязание, СХЕМЫ
@stilnoe_vjazanie · 52,005
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Ручки вяжут | Вязание
@hand_knit · 379,162
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Вязаные Идеи. Вязание
@knitideas · 25,544
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
Вязание спицами и крючком
@spize25 · 73,985
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
Вяжи со мной
@cjvyjq03 · 27,776
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Ирина Невзорова
@nevzorovaclub · 32,706
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 7 September 2026
Вяжем с @knitting_group_
@knitting_gr · 27,134
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Вяжите для души
@knitforsoul · 48,136
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍒 Переходник 🍒” (@vjazanie_otkutur), 4 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vjazanie_otkutur.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.