Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vixxen cosplays || ✨

Channel

vixxen cosplays || ✨

@vixxen_cosplays

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

77subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003512628146
TypeChannel
Username@vixxen_cosplays
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vixxen_cosplays

Growth

777877.59 August 2026 — 78 subscribers9 August 2026 — 78 subscribers16 August 2026 — 77 subscribers9 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–78 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:3677-1
9 Aug 2026, 20:0078no change
9 Aug 2026, 03:0078first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
218.8%
avg views ÷ 77 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held10 (23 June 202629 July 2026)
Views total674
Reactions total103
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

281 reactions across 10 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53437766072134755537024.9%
custom 58933590418616553103311.7%
258.90%
custom 5456346969897206321238.19%
🥰207.12%
custom 5301050457236445678186.41%
🔥176.05%
custom 5379958150449359821144.98%
custom 5278262460275516859124.27%
💋124.27%
93.20%
custom 597219456244410385572.49%
😁72.49%
❤‍🔥41.42%
🤩41.42%
💅31.07%
💘31.07%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vixxen_cosplays. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC94 views36 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤭 никогда ещё не была так заряжена на косплей, как сейчас 🤩

custom 5343776607213475553159🔥7custom 58933590418616553103💅1💘1

29 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC74 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @madkerooPhoto

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 — ᴨᴩощᴀй, ɸᴇоɸᴀн. 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻— ᴨᴩощᴀй, зᴀндиᴋ. 🌟👻🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟👻🌟 Ближайший косплан вместе с Виксен! Очень люблю этих двоих, думаю в нашем исполнении при наших отношениях они выйдут весьма… канонными… #косплан #дотторе #панталоне

custom 53437766072134755537🤩4custom 589335904186165531041custom 54563469698972063211

25 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC147 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ребятки, есть у кого вигмейкер хороший знакомый? посоветуйте мне кого-нибудь пж, переукладочка фуринки очень нужна 🙏🤩

custom 527826246027551685910custom 54563469698972063215custom 53437766072134755532custom 58933590418616553101

23 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC359 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟 ✨ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤✨ 🌟 вот такие прелестные фоточки с КошФеста у нас получились! мы с Керо очень крутые я считаю <3 🐋 фотограф, которому я ручки целовала (реально) :3 рп/рт? 🤩 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

10custom 54563469698972063218🥰5custom 52782624602755168592custom 53010504572364456782custom 58933590418616553102💋1🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC216 views34 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

подготовила паричок к завтрашнему <3 🤩

custom 589335904186165531015💋9🔥6custom 54563469698972063212custom 53010504572364456781custom 53437766072134755531

8 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC247 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 буду 12го июля на кошачем фесте в Люмин <3 скорее всего в фулле. хочу сделать аушку, но не знаю какую 🤩 накидайте идей, кому не сложно! с кем увижусь? 😀

custom 58933590418616553108custom 54563469698972063217custom 537995815044935982162🔥1custom 53010504572364456781

29 Jun 2026, 13:25 UTC273 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

💠 у моего бро двоих до 100 подписчиков не хватает /⁠ᐠ⁠。⁠ꞈ⁠。⁠ᐟ⁠\ добьете? 🥺

custom 53437766072134755535custom 59721945624441038555custom 53010504572364456783💅2custom 53799581504493598211

26 Jun 2026, 06:40 UTC304 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026

💕 всем доброе утро! короче говоря.. я долго думала, думала, и наконец надумала.😁 хочу оставить вам ссылочку на свой личный тгк! там моя жизнь, всякие приколы, смех, рыдания и не только. ☁ https://t.me/+mKr8lHapBvplNzQx по заявочкам! приму любимых, тру-фанатиков <3

custom 53437766072134755538🥰64❤‍🔥3💋2custom 53799581504493598211

24 Jun 2026, 17:09 UTC254 views39 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🤩🤩 "ветерок на крыше весьма приятен.." 🤩🤩🤩🤩🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🌟🌟🌟 а вот и те самые фотки с 21го числа! очень благодарна фотографу <3 🪧🪧🌸🪧🪧 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 534377660721347555316🥰9😁7custom 53799581504493598213custom 53010504572364456782💘1custom 59721945624441038551

23 Jun 2026, 17:28 UTC202 views40 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 слов нет, одни эмоции. 🥹 ⭐️🤩 оба дня прошли безумно хорошо. много веселилась, танцевала, виделась со старыми знакомыми. меня даже абсолютно НИЧЕГО за два дня не расстроило! также меня украл фотограф на мини-фотосессию на крыше. чуть позже сделаю отдельным пост об этом. 🤩 безумно благодарна своим друзьям, и конечно же керошке, за то, что помогли создать такие сказочные воспоминания 🤩 всем волшебного

custom 534377660721347555315custom 530105045723644567898custom 53799581504493598213🔥2❤‍🔥1💘1custom 59721945624441038551

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @vixxen_cosplays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 141,311 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vixxen cosplays || ✨” (@vixxen_cosplays), 77 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vixxen_cosplays.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.