Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for viviqwu

Channel

viviqwu

@viviqwu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001858366692
TypeChannel
Username@viviqwu
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/viviqwu

Growth

484948.526 August 2026 — 49 subscribers26 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 September 2026 — 48 subscribers26 August 202610 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–49 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 08:1648-1
26 Aug 2026, 18:3049no change
26 Aug 2026, 18:1549first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
88.8%
avg views ÷ 48 subscribers
Avg views / post
42.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held15 (27 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total213
Reactions total60
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3821.8%
❤‍🔥3520.1%
🔥3319.0%
🍓3017.2%
🥰116.32%
🕊105.75%
😇42.30%
👀31.72%
🤩31.72%
😍21.15%
🦄21.15%
💋10.575%
💘10.575%
🤡10.575%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC23 views8 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Если что это моя голова на тарелке, если вдруг у меня не получилось сделать себя узнаваемой

🕊3🍓2🔥2👀1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

24 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC27 views14 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

С днем рождения мою крутую свэговую подруню❤️‍🩹

❤‍🔥63🔥2🍓1🕊1🤡1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

19 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC44 views9 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Если что, не волнуйтесь, рисунки будут, но позже. Просто я взяла небольшую паузу после активного постинга, чтобы не выгореть

5🍓3🕊1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

15 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC57 views11 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @dyed_imp_in_vacuumPhoto

Скетчевый реквест для @v1vidr34m

❤‍🔥7🔥3🕊1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

13 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC62 views18 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

я часто рисую в последние дни, вы рады? ненавижу то, что мои работы выглядят по-разному в зависимости от экрана. Эта, например, потеряла всю контрастность на мониторе🥲🥲

🔥7❤‍🔥5😇4🍓2

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

11 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC68 views9 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Постоянно задумываюсь над тем делает ли меня плохим художником отсутсвие одного стиля в моих работах? 🤔🤔🤔

🥰51❤‍🔥1🍓1🕊1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

11 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC55 views19 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Без эффекта

🔥7🥰42🤩2❤‍🔥1🍓1👀1🕊1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

11 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC50 views14 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

наконец-то сделала нормальный референс хотя бы для одного персонажа

4🍓3🔥2❤‍🔥1👀1💋1🕊1😍1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

10 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC47 views16 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Блин нужно что-то выкладывать

6❤‍🔥4🔥3🍓1🕊1🥰1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

10 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC53 views9 reactionsread 26 August 2026

В честь новых подписчиков думаю по какому фандому нарисовать фанарт. Жду ваших предложений

🍓63

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

5 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC77 views12 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Мне слишком нравится рисовать Суа

4❤‍🔥3🍓3💘1🔥1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

3 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC186 views15 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

С днем рождения меня, мне исполняется целых зернадцать лет.😦😦 Как говорится, лучший подарок на др художнику — репост его работ

❤‍🔥64🔥3🍓1😍1

Signed ⋆୨୧˚⋆𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ | #serotoninedeprived

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @viviqwu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“viviqwu” (@viviqwu), 48 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viviqwu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.