Channel
@vivianin_bless
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001974287000 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vivianin_bless |
| Created | 29 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vivianin_bless |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 121 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 123 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 124 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 124 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
294 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 294 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2025 to 15 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
а за ней только пустота пустота пустота, так хочу её, чтобы заполнить собой, чтобы вся моя тоска разделилась на два, чтобы размазать её апатичные движения по моему телу.
🕊12
Signed Виноград⁴²
Ребята заходите в новый канал
🕊12
Signed Виноград⁴²
всех приветствую с неприятной новостью! мой аккаунт взломали удалили, поэтому доступ ко многим каналам утерян. но не беда! создаём ещё один, новый этап своей жизни. здесь я буду появляться чаще, чем разу в неделю (!) всех милости прошу https://t.me/blessdayy
🕊15
Signed Виноград⁴²
Photo, posted without a caption
🕊15
Signed ✎ᝰ 𝒷𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒻𝓊𝓁
почему "М" напоминает мне мотив какой-нибудь из песен, которые исполняют леониды в секае, особенно в конце 🏃
🕊17
Signed ✎ᝰ 𝒷𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒻𝓊𝓁
строй свой счастливый путь, бери всё, что ты заслуживаешь и можешь воплотить
🕊18
Signed ✎ᝰ 𝒷𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒻𝓊𝓁
меня не пробило на слёзы, но я представила, что это так, когда прослушала хрупко. потому что, я действительно рада и песни царапают что-то внутри
🕊21
Signed ✎ᝰ 𝒷𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒻𝓊𝓁
Photo, posted without a caption
🕊16
Signed ✎ᝰ 𝒷𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒻𝓊𝓁
крутиться как ебанный смерч, уничтожая, а не адаптируясь
🕊13
Signed ✎ᝰ 𝒷𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒻𝓊𝓁
хочется плюнуть оптимизма, чтобы захлебнуться в мнимой эйфории, но всё на что ты способен - страдать и делать из этого контент для ночных времяпровождений
🕊13
Signed ✎ᝰ 𝒷𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒻𝓊𝓁
в меня роняют окурки мои собственные мутки с омерзительным запахом гнили и водки - раздражающее ощущение реальности
🕊15
Signed ✎ᝰ 𝒷𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒻𝓊𝓁
как же ахуенно освобождаться от ответственности в последний срок (на следующий день ты наберёшь новых)
🕊19
Signed ✎ᝰ 𝒷𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒻𝓊𝓁
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vivianin_bless. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“паникую.” (@vivianin_bless), 121 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vivianin_bless.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.