6 measurements spanning 42 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 243–252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:18
251
+3
30 Aug 2026, 15:07
248
+1
23 Aug 2026, 05:27
247
+3
15 Aug 2026, 17:07
244
-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:35
245
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:14
245
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 23s
Average length
2m 23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
154 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
72
46.8%
🔥
24
15.6%
👍
18
11.7%
custom 5228818152518878920
14
9.09%
custom 5228898592961362329
13
8.44%
❤🔥
10
6.49%
😍
3
1.95%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Этот канал меняется вместе с нами.
Раньше он был каналом Центра Витапластики.
Теперь Центр стал Лабораторией интегративной эстетики Витапластика, и у канала появляется новая роль.
Теперь это «Для себя» - пространство для клиентов и гостей Лаборатории.
Здесь мы будем делиться понятными знаниями о теле, лице и состоянии, простыми практиками самоподдержки, интересными материалами и приглашениями на мероприятия Лабор…
С 8 Марта! 🦋
Дорогие женщины, поздравляем вас с этим прекрасным весенним праздником!
Пусть в вашей жизни будет больше лёгкости, внутренней гармонии и заботы о себе.
Пусть тело радует здоровьем и энергией, дыхание остаётся свободным, а каждый день приносит ощущение силы, красоты и спокойствия.
Желаем вам бережного отношения к себе, вдохновения, тепла и любви - к миру и к своему телу.
Пусть весна начинается с обновл…
❤️ Центр естественного омоложения VITAPLASTICA
Мы делаем людей моложе и красивее без аппаратов, только ручными запатентованными техниками
Что такое Витапластика? - Читайте статью
Интервью с Надеждой Басюбиной - создателем метода и центра Витапластики
Записаться на Витапластику
Мы находимся по адресу: Московская область, город Королев, проспект Космонавтов дом 29/12 корпус 1
Яндекс карты
2ГИС
Наш телефон +799592004…
Общие изменения лица
• Лицо выглядит более подтянутым и собранным.
• Общая симметрия стала лучше, черты выглядят более гармоничными.
• Кожа кажется более ровной по тону, лицо выглядит свежее.
Брови
• Брови стали более симметричными по высоте и форме.
• Взгляд выглядит более открытым за счёт лёгкого подъёма зоны бровей.
• Ушла небольшая асимметрия в области надбровных дуг.
Глаза и зона вокруг глаз
• Область п…
🦋 Нужна ли Витапластика в 36?
В этом возрасте еще рано говорить о возрастных изменениях, однако многие девушки уже начинают замечать первые деформации и задумываться о путях решения.
✅ Если нет заболеваний кожи, то в этот период жизни не нужна ни лечебная, ни эстетическая косметология.
Достаточно заниматься оздоровительной эстетикой, чтобы восстановить работу мышц лица, убрать накопившиеся напряжения.
У организма…
Витапластика относится к методам оздоровительной эстетики.
Ее главная задача - достигать эстетического эффекта через оздоровление тканей.
Витапластика:
Не нарушает целостности тканей
Восстанавливает трофику тканей
За счет восстановления биологических процессов происходит визуальное омоложение
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤🔥7👍5🔥5
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @vitaplastica_centr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДЛЯ СЕБЯ | Лаборатория Витапластики” (@vitaplastica_centr), 251 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vitaplastica_centr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.