Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐Ÿฆˆ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฐ๐‘บ๐‘ป๐‘ฌ๐‘น๐‘ฐ๐‘จ๐Ÿฆˆ

@visteriamightbehere

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

171subscribers

+72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003965344326
TypeChannel
Username@visteriamightbehere
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/visteriamightbehere

Growth

991711356 August 2026 โ€” 99 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 117 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 117 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 171 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 88โ€“182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:26171+54
9 Aug 2026, 05:00117no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:11117+18
6 Aug 2026, 13:0199first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
174.0%
avg views รท 171 subscribers
Avg views / post
298
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.20%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (5 August 2026 โ€“ 8 August 2026)
Views total5,357
Reactions total218
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

218 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ”ฅ8237.6%
๐Ÿ“3516.1%
๐Ÿณ2712.4%
๐Ÿ’˜2310.6%
๐Ÿ’‹146.42%
๐Ÿ’”135.96%
โšก94.13%
๐Ÿ‘62.75%
๐ŸŽ‰31.38%
๐Ÿ‘พ20.917%
๐Ÿฆ„20.917%
๐Ÿคฏ10.459%
๐Ÿฅฐ10.459%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC32 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Have you ever had um like a big inner rage out of nowhere and thought about slimming the first person who dares to talk to you and then feeling guilty?

๐Ÿ‘5

6 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Don't be shy tell me your fav characters ๐Ÿ˜ž

๐Ÿ’˜1

6 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC136 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

I did NOT expect your support guys love ya๐Ÿฉท

๐Ÿ“4๐Ÿ’‹3๐Ÿ’˜1

6 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC235 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Guys you can see my other artworks they're pinned anddd if you had something to say leave a comment or you can send your messages to my anon link on my bio๐Ÿฉท๐Ÿฆˆ

๐Ÿ”ฅ7๐Ÿ“5๐Ÿ’˜3๐Ÿ’‹1

6 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC262 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Thank you all๐Ÿ’‹๐Ÿฉท https://t.me/lanasdrawingslol https://t.me/iRxvie https://t.me/sinakart https://t.me/everlivingnetherbound https://t.me/tojoclanofficialmember https://t.me/witchgirllara https://t.me/kiwisarusshitss https://t.me/akaidess https://t.me/sharkie_art https://t.me/ostad_eric https://t.me/Elithiium https://t.me/vixiiei https://t.me/allofmydaydreams https://t.me/kinaNXxx https://t.me/deadly_arts https://t.me/โ€ฆ

๐Ÿ’‹10๐Ÿณ2๐Ÿ’˜2๐Ÿ“1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @visteriamightbehere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 10,910 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

*Akai*art*
@akaidess ยท 1,492
1 post
๐Ÿš๏ธัั‚ะฐั€ั‹ะน ัะฐะผัƒั€ะฐะน๐ŸŒฐ
@clownornothing ยท 550
1 post
แด…แด€xส
@Dax_dei ยท 272
1 post
โ€ขโ€ขWarrior's Worldโ€ขโ€ข
@deadly_arts ยท 541
1 post
โบโ€งโ‚Šโ˜เผป ๐ธ๐“๐’พ๐“€๐’ถ๐“‡๐“‰ ๐’Ÿ๐’พ๐’ถ๐“‡๐“Ž เผบโ˜โ‚Šโ€งโบ
@elikartdailym ยท 232
1 post
๐Ÿ•ฏ๏ธหš โ‹† Honoraโ€™s Corner
@fablehonora ยท 596
1 post
๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต'๐–ฟ๐—Ž๐—… (๐Ÿฅ•)
@faith0_0ful ยท 868
1 post
dump fishโ—‹oใ€‚.
@glup_sa ยท 585
1 post
Hao๏ฝกโ :๏พŸโ (โ ;โ ยดโ โˆฉโ `โ ;โ )๏พŸโ :โ ๏ฝก
@haoolioofoxx ยท 2,845
1 post
Keonta/himari arts
@Hhhimarii ยท 135
1 post
Lana's drawings
@lanasdrawingslol ยท 337
1 post
โ‚Šหš.แดษชแด€ แด…แดแดแด…สŸแด‡sโ˜พโ‹†โบ
@mia_artmeow ยท 332
1 post
Nari's Stuff ๐Ÿ“ฆ
@narisart ยท 341
1 post
๐Ÿฆ‹Nira
@nira_arts ยท 593
1 post
.หˆlลdษ™s๐“†ธ
@ostad_eric ยท 431
1 post
PoroshArt
@poroshart ยท 124
1 post
SINAK Art
@sinakart ยท 4,234
1 post
Outcasts
@The0utcasts ยท 993
1 post
๐‘ณ๐’‚๐’…๐’š๐‘ณ๐’‚๐’“๐’‚๐Ÿ–ค
@witchgirllara ยท 437
1 post
Y_ J
@Y_J13_133 ยท 188
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

*Akai*art*
@akaidess ยท 1,492
1 post
Dayum son
@artpornoooo ยท 42
1 post
BLASTR๐Ÿ’ฅ(POSTER COMMISSIONS IS OPEN!)
@Blastr_str ยท 159
1 post
๐Ÿš๏ธัั‚ะฐั€ั‹ะน ัะฐะผัƒั€ะฐะน๐ŸŒฐ
@clownornothing ยท 550
1 post
โ€ขโ€ขWarrior's Worldโ€ขโ€ข
@deadly_arts ยท 541
1 post
Designation 809
@everlivingnetherbound ยท 257
1 post
HAPPY JACKIE :3
@Foxienosa689 ยท 310
1 post
Frankie's Lab๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ”ฌ
@Frankies_lab ยท 199
1 post
๐‘ฃฒEternity.
@hastitheimmortal ยท 210
1 post
ื‚๐…„โ„๏ธ โ„œover's Soro โŠน
@iRxvie ยท 78
1 post
Selyrah
@itsselyrah ยท 3,280
1 post
ยฆNXxxx
@kinaNXxx ยท 41
1 post
๐”‡๐”ž๐”ฏ๐” ๐”ถโ€™๐”ฐ ๐”ก๐”ž๐”ฆ๐”ฉ๐”ถ
@kiwisarusshitss ยท 224
1 post
Lana's drawings
@lanasdrawingslol ยท 337
1 post
Nari's Stuff ๐Ÿ“ฆ
@narisart ยท 341
1 post
๐Ÿฆ‹Nira
@nira_arts ยท 593
1 post
.หˆlลdษ™s๐“†ธ
@ostad_eric ยท 431
1 post
PoroshArt
@poroshart ยท 124
1 post
sสœแด€แดษชสŸแด€xส๐ŸŒฑ
@Shamilaxy ยท 129
1 post
SHANENz๐Ÿฆ 
@shan3nz ยท 270
1 post
SINAK Art
@sinakart ยท 4,234
1 post
๊ง๐Ÿ‰๐šƒ๐š˜๐š“๐š˜ ๐šŒ๐š•๐šŠ๐š— ๐™ท๐š€ แตƒสณแต—๐ŸŽ๐‘
@tojoclanofficialmember ยท 162
1 post
๐‘ณ๐’‚๐’…๐’š๐‘ณ๐’‚๐’“๐’‚๐Ÿ–ค
@witchgirllara ยท 437
1 post
Y_ J
@Y_J13_133 ยท 188
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿฆˆ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฐ๐‘บ๐‘ป๐‘ฌ๐‘น๐‘ฐ๐‘จ๐Ÿฆˆโ€ (@visteriamightbehere), 171 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/visteriamightbehere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.