наконец то мед
🍾1💘1
Signed ре'домино

Channel
@vistels
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001741936676 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vistels |
| Description | •━───────────≪𐚁≫───────────━• ✩ Эдиты и прочее что не попадает в тт соберётся здесь. •Карточка в закрепе. ☆ Юз: @cpizdiltank |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vistels |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 58 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 58 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
145 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍾 | 31 | 21.4% | |
| custom 5372998160241159696 | 28 | 19.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 12.4% | |
| 🕊 | 18 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5197452251169304501 | 16 | 11.0% | |
| 🍓 | 16 | 11.0% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 5.52% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 5.52% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 1.38% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2025 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
наконец то мед
🍾1💘1
Signed ре'домино
«Let me put you in the picture.» я к вам с эдитом с жони сильверхендом, игру прошла ещё зимой, а ручки дошли только сейчас, наслаждайтесь. реакции, лайки и репосты давайте, люблю. 🫶 ˗ˏˋ #cyberpunk #johnnysilverhand ˎˊ˗
🍓5🍾4💋2🖕1
Signed Эль. – [星空]
лайк подписка
💘4🍾1🖕1
Signed доминос
Sticker, posted without a caption
💘1
Signed доминос
«Forever and ever.» эдит с любимыми спустя пол года, теперь можно ещё пару месяцев отдыхать 💥 реакций давайте, от репостов не откажусь 🫶 ˗ˏˋ #marvel #gwenandpeter ˎˊ˗
🍾6❤🔥5🍓3💋1
Signed Эль. – [星空]
я календарь, переверну..
🍾2custom 53729981602411596962
Signed Эль. – [星空]
maybe this is not a dream? очередной эдит за этот месяц, прониклась этим трендом и долго пыталась придумать, с кем все таки сделать. Я в ударе, надеюсь ещё эдиты будут 😝 репосты и реакции, ребят 💋 ˗ˏˋ #rdr2 #vistelsedit ˎˊ˗
🍾7custom 53729981602411596964💋3
Signed Эль. – [星空]
«did he say Nirvana?» soon.. 26.06. Не могла не сделать эдит к выходу этой игры, надеюсь что поиграю в неё как можно скорее.😋 люблю репосты и реакции, ребят 🙏 ˗ˏˋ #deathstranding #кодзимагений ˎˊ˗
🕊7custom 53729981602411596963
Signed Эль. – [星空]
«stay close, they're coming.» омагад, второе видео за месяц, держим планку. Надеюсь что в этой игре хотя бы мельком покажут Джилл и Клэр, ибо они все равно связанны с раккун сити 😔. репосты и реакции люблю 🫶 ˗ˏˋ #re9 #residentevil ˎˊ˗
🕊6custom 53729981602411596964
Signed Эль. – [星空]
ещё этой ночью анонсировали re9, поэтому возможно вывалю контента и по трейлеру 🤫
💘2
Signed Эль. – [星空]
«If you really want to see Mary, you should just die.» по некоторым причинам в мае эдиты отсутствовали, поэтому возвращаюсь к вам с чем-то простеньким по сайлент хиллу.😶🌫 за реакции и репосты зацелую 🙏 ˗ˏˋ #silenthill #mary #jamessunderland ˎˊ˗
custom 51974522511693045013🍾2🕊1
Signed Эль. – [星空]
вместо эдитов вистелс вспахивает поле в сто тысяч гектар
custom 53729981602411596962
Signed Эль. – [星空]
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vistels. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,395,097 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“vistels🧌” (@vistels), 58 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vistels.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.