Channel
@visrolka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002026834372 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @visrolka |
| Description | вся информация есть в навигации. если есть вопросы писать- @rrokkss |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/visrolka |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 12 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 50.0% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2024 to 20 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
владелец @damwessrk балаболка,которая везде трезвонит о том что задоксит @fmweksex из-за их недавнего конфликта? — ANON MESSAGE наивная и обезвоженная narkolica делится со всеми своим желанием «задоксить венеру», но, дорогая, ты выбрала не тех людей для общения и доверяешь не тому скрин будет в комментариях
Signed рокся
может открыться?
🕊2
Signed рокся
рп
Signed рокся
Набор в люкс вновь открыт!🍂 чтобы попасть в наш проект вам нужно ознакомиться с правилами,а после написать в наш бот ( @luxuryprj_bot ) и ждать ответа мы не ркф,а проект с влд > всем удачи!
Signed рокся
`New friends] ᦕ @visrolka ꕨ @fckpornostars .read the rules before union. .
Signed рокся
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed рокся
айнель , нася ,кэр ,кожеин смурфики ,дашуля катрис , милана ,тич ,лера коза ,кириллова , эфтелова , @ggrokss , @whatwantsw ,диана блэк ,@w1nliksx ,алиса вайс ,@vampgrlz , поля библ , скоро арай будет ,эми тиффани ,ната рикет ,саша , езе лиха снифл ,влада вис и еще много очень других
Signed рокся
любим ценим 🫶🏻
Signed рокся
я уже называла топ три, щас других напишу ахуенн @rknymphs @sexsway @nwcds @D3M0V1 @visrolka
Signed рокся
– · –eftel looking for union 🩵 write / rules / channel #eftelrp
Signed рокся
──────────────────────── 🥳😚🤨🙃🥺🙄❗️ 🥺🥳🥰😚🙃🫥🥸🤥🤒 ──────────────────────── Мы очень нуждаемся в рабочих руках! 🤥админы по союзам (0/2) 🤥админы по нью в чат (0/2) 🤥админы по креативу (0/1) ──────────────────────── Если вы хотите стать частью семьи дэмсиков, чего вы ждете? Присоединяйтесь к нашему коллективу) П.с. писать владельцу🐾 ──────────────────────── #mdmstag
Signed рокся
рп🙏🏻
🕊1
Signed рокся
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @visrolka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,161,974 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@visrolka named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙑𝙞𝙨､” (@visrolka), 12 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/visrolka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.