Channel
@visioncalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
107subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001712064210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @visioncalls |
| Description | Write For advertising and collaboration @visioncallsowner - |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 17 May 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/visioncalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 107 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 107 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 56.7% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 23.3% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2022 to 30 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Madara Inu BSC Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 💸 0.644 BNB ($190.90) 🪙 14,899,759,299,… MADARA 👤 Buyer 0xb1d1…8aa2 🔥 New Holder 💰 Market Cap $12,076 📊 Chart | #️⃣ Buy Txn ✅ Join $BUY | 📈 Top Trending 🚨 Madara Inu BSC Trending #5 on Buy Bot Madness
👍6
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Safe dev. But Degen MC:1-2k https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x89a1ada7324c1c1bd2f006230fc165903f2c1aad
👍2
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Stealth. Big names in the chat https://t.me/andreatateinu
👍3❤1
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Shihtzu - Prelaunch Great dev stealth launching this one at any time, lots of planning went into this and he always pushes hard 1000+ people in the telegram so it will be quite hyped when launched, so wait for a juicy dip to ape, I’m excited for this one! NFA @Shihtzu_Inu_Portal
👍5❤1
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
20x from my call. This is just the beginning. Big thinks coming.
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Just stealth launched. Dev is my friend. So 100% safe. Good and big callers will come after me. I hope it's a moonshot. MC: 2-3 K https://t.me/Soraportalbsc
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Aped this. Safe dev. Venom and made many other calls called. MC: 58k https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x201463726a6ae34533f20a0a3ee2617e12135578 https://t.me/MinionsCoin
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Aped this. Moon or dust. MC:2K @ChowChowInuu https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xe5bf5061c45736af830e3e62f9a29e8a2c215beb
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
SquidMatic Worked with Dev before , name and logo are good and community is hyped, degen play for now lets see where it goes NFA 5k https://t.me/SquidMatic https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x96c7776982026ea244e48a42009972b38bfef5ef
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Aped this, Safe dev. Lets see what happen 🚀 https://t.me/SquidshibaTwoportal https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xd7e6dea60f6ff0f97841936c46e54d750d277c4e
🔥3
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Just launched, Should be safe Low tax MC: 9K https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x1a86a34c05beec27a0e0432471e69195c3b6a718 https://t.me/IshigamiBSC
❤2
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Shikoku - currently at 20k market-cap. They just launched their own swap. If they can work it out good, they could go very far. It’s a new team for me but let’s see! NFA,DYOR! https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x674e1a523bb82903ca47c836cca61af38612d001 https://t.me/shikokuinuofficial https://shikoku.live/swap/
Signed Vision Owner of @visioncalls
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @visioncalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,473,959 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@visioncalls named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vision Calls” (@visioncalls), 107 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/visioncalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.