Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for rest | ’ 𝘊ꫀ𝘳𝘪ʂɛ 𐍃ʈμɗ𝘪𝘰 🗝︵

Channel

rest | ’ 𝘊ꫀ𝘳𝘪ʂɛ 𐍃ʈμɗ𝘪𝘰 🗝︵

@vishnevskiyst

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002520538401
TypeChannel
Username@vishnevskiyst
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vishnevskiyst

Growth

2112 Aug 2026, 05:16 — 21 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 18:33 — 21 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 05:1612 Aug 2026, 18:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:3321no change
12 Aug 2026, 05:1621first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 10 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53145315392398597021613.1%
custom 53593395930092266341411.5%
custom 53594226061371258231411.5%
custom 52472195662364311411310.7%
custom 53166071852648654501310.7%
custom 5294539574578545725108.20%
custom 534619718206203128997.38%
custom 528081656565730009164.92%
custom 529423191748119508832.46%
custom 529435742072055185632.46%
custom 529446934327331889032.46%
custom 531694326645577691232.46%
custom 536845999042202967132.46%
custom 540251534016277847732.46%
custom 530571516108711077921.64%
custom 531456893122513865921.64%
custom 538872097035992991721.64%
custom 521090046808296084610.82%
custom 526041385609359822310.82%
custom 526936432312532557010.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2025 to 9 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vishnevskiyst. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 September 2025 to 9 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Nov 2025, 14:03 UTC166 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ощущение, что пора закрываться но опять же не хочу, тк я занимаюсь дизайном, но сейчас на это попросту нет времени 🌟 понятия не имею что делать

custom 52472195662364311415custom 53145315392398597022custom 53594226061371258232

5 Nov 2025, 14:45 UTC177 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

((🍹) 🎥੭̲ 🤩𝗲𝘄 🤩𝗼𝗿𝗸 . . 🖱 тот самый большой заказ. ⭐️ ‘‘ time — ??? ✦ message 彡 price 𑄹 ʙдᴏхнᴏʙиᴧиᴄь — ᴏᴛʍᴇᴛиᴧи. ❤️ файлом в комм ⬇️ #order

custom 53594226061371258237custom 53145315392398597022custom 53169432664557769122custom 53461971820620312892custom 53593395930092266341

1 Nov 2025, 13:24 UTC160 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

((🌜) 🎥੭̲ 🤩𝗲𝘄 🤩𝗼𝗿𝗸 . . 🖱 мы все любим альбедо.💎 ⭐️ ‘‘ time — ??? ✦ message 彡 price 𑄹 ʙдᴏхнᴏʙиᴧиᴄь — ᴏᴛʍᴇᴛиᴧи. ❤️ файлом в комм ⬇️ #order

custom 53145315392398597026custom 53166071852648654504custom 53461971820620312894custom 52472195662364311412custom 53593395930092266341custom 53594226061371258231

1 Nov 2025, 07:22 UTC130 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

сегодня будет пост, честно 🌟 оформление на 10+ позиций выложу

custom 53145315392398597023custom 53166071852648654502custom 53593395930092266342custom 53461971820620312891

25 Oct 2025, 16:07 UTC145 views10 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Wᥱᥣᥴ᧐ⲙᥱ ᴛ᧐ ᥲ ᥒᥱᥕ ᥱrᥲ . . . 🤩

custom 53166071852648654504custom 53593395930092266342custom 53594226061371258232custom 52472195662364311411custom 53169432664557769121

25 Oct 2025, 16:06 UTC138 views15 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Zz ✨ ︵ ’ 🤩𝑎𝑣𝑖ℊa𝑡͟͟𝑖͟͟𝑜͟͟𝑛͟͟ 𝑏𝑦 𐍃ʈμɗ𝘪𝘰 🎁︵ ༢ 🎥🎥🌟😻 🎀 ‘ 𝓦𝑒𝑙𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 ⚜. 🎀 . 🌟😻 🎥੭̲🎀 Д᧐δρ᧐ ᥰ᧐жᥲ᧘᧐ʙᥲᴛь ʙ 𝑪𝒆𝒓𝒊s͟͟e͟͟ 𐍃ʈμɗ𝘪𝘰 ⏝︶ 🎥🎥ᯓ ‘ Вы ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛᥱ ᤋᥲκᥲᤋᥲᴛь ᧐ɸ᧐ρⲙ᧘ᥱн͟͟ᥙᥱ: ᥲʙᥲᴛᥲρ, δᥲннᥱρ ᥙ᧘ᥙ жᥱ ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛᥱρ . . 🤩🤩 🎥🎥𝟢𝟩 ❤️大水 ⸝⸝ T𝒂ɠѕ ; #practice ; #order 🎥🎥🎥✨ ‎𐔌‌ ‎ ‎◌⃘Вᥴя нужнᥲя ᥙнɸ᧐ρⲙᥲцᥙя ᥰρᥱдᥴᴛᥲʙ᧘ᥱнᥲ нᥙжᥱ 🤩 : 🎀 ME \ 🤩 🌜 🤩 INFO \ UNION \ PORT \ 🤩 PRICE \ MATERIAL \ 🤩 ANKETA \ BOOST | 🎀 🎥🎥𓂃 🎀 Зᥲκᥲᤋы — ᧐ᴛ

custom 53593395930092266346custom 52472195662364311413custom 53145315392398597023custom 53145689312251386592custom 53461971820620312891

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vishnevskiyst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,111,025 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rest | ’ 𝘊ꫀ𝘳𝘪ʂɛ 𐍃ʈμɗ𝘪𝘰 🗝︵” (@vishnevskiyst), 21 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vishnevskiyst.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.