It's time to move to RobinHood guys Lock in A lot of opportunities and millionaires to be made there

Channel
Virtual Jolly
@virtual_jolly_channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
453subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002999406994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @virtual_jolly_channel |
| Description | Owner: @Virtual_Jolly Building and sharing gems X: https://x.com/Virtual_Jolly_ |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/virtual_jolly_channel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 453 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 453 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 63
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 75
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Never go against the trend Baby Ansem 3M
Baby Ansem bought the dip and now let’s 1.7M
Gonna focus on the next runner
It looks like I'm not lucky with things related to Ansem, missed Ansem and also baby Ansem which is still ok to buy anyway. I had notification at 200k and it pumped to 900k
Bough DaVinci at 400k Always remember to take profit and leave a moonbag We will catch the next runner without risking our money, if it does 2x recover the money and leave the moonbag especially if it is a low marketcap token DqFRdmWd8P3FC8c6XDk64eY1hFHjJ56N9dhZS3jUpump
Holding good 1.5M marketcap ATH Now at 960k
1.7M Murad 10x Only winners today 🚀
Co-founder of Wif, Dave is trying to make history again Wif has a new hat, it's called Wif2 600k Marketcap https://dexscreener.com/solana/gja8ec4mgb79zp3cniz92vdozp4khcsqpj1xknkabhw1
Murad 400k still early, 2.5x Murad last token went to 40M in 8h Luke did the same this morning..sitting at 1M for an hour and then it went to the moon 14M and I think it will reach 50M easily
Buying Murad right now at 160k Risky but if it moves we will be so early https://dexscreener.com/solana/atct3gwnpf4yos68dmt4xiqjeenvn38rdxebqffnbbwo
14.5M Lukeeeeeeeeeeeee
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @virtual_jolly_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 608,079 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Virtual Jolly” (@virtual_jolly_channel), 453 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/virtual_jolly_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.