Channel
@viral_X_club
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
163subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001670465705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @viral_X_club |
| Created | 13 December 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/viral_X_club |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 163 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 166 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 171 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 173 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 172 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 172 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 13 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
120 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 63 | 52.5% | |
| ❤ | 46 | 38.3% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 7.50% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.833% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.833% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2022 to 4 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Join 💸 @viral_X_club
❤5👍5
Signed 🥀͢ ̶̶ͥ ̶ ̶ͣ ͓ ͫ𝐓𝐬𝐟⛦⃕͜𝐒𝐡𝐞𝐡𝐳𝐚𝐝𝐚⛦⃕͜🇮🇳 Maıŋ’wahı-hʋŋ Jıse’Deĸhĸar-terı ßehŋ’Sɱıle-Detı Haı
Aaj Baat Karte Hai Prk Urf Abhijeet Mulla ki Ye Randi ka pilla bot banake khudko fighter bolta jab eski maa xhudti to mute and ban kr deta Randi ka pilla khudke group se bahar nhi aata waise cricket op khel leta ye 😂😂😂
👍19❤16
#ROHIT BHAGWAAN MADKE PATIL 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 TELIGRAM PAR RAVAN NAME SE GHUMTA HAI AUR LAKIYONKO CHEAT KRNA GF BANANA ISKA DHANDA HEE ASLI NAME ISKA #ROHIT BHAGWAAN MADKE PATIL HEE SHADISHUDA RAMDI RAVAN EK SAL KI LADKI KA BAAP HOTE HUYE BHI YAHA TELIGRAM PE GF BANATA HAI AUR LADKIYONKO CHEAT KARTA HAI YE MADARCHOD RAMDI RAVAN KI BIWI KI CHUT MARUNGA BHADVE 😂😂 SHARAM KAR TERI BHI BETI HAI KAI AISA NA HO TERI BETI KE FEE…
👍17❤12👏1😁1
𝘑𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘖𝘹𝘺𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘜𝘳𝘧 - 𝘉𝘪𝘴𝘸𝘢𝘫𝘪𝘵 𝘔𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘒𝘢 𝘱𝘪𝘤
🤮9❤2👍2
KRISHNA MULLA
👍6❤4
JUNGLI Lᴇᴍᴍᴀ
❤2
Jᴜɴɢʟɪ Kᴀʀᴛɪᴋᴀʏ
𝙺𝚁𝙸𝚂𝙷𝙽𝙰 𝙺𝙸 𝚂𝙴𝚇𝚈 𝙶𝙵 𝚂𝙷𝙸𝙺𝚄 𝙺𝙸 𝙿𝙸𝙲
👍4❤2
JUNGLI NOBITA MULLA KI GF
👍3
𝘑𝘢𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳 𝘶𝘧𝘳 𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘩 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘬𝘪 𝘱𝘪𝘤 𝘮𝘪𝘭 𝘨𝘺𝘢
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @viral_X_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@viral_X_club named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Viral Club By Tsf” (@viral_X_club), 163 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viral_X_club.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.