Channel

subs ch baru @apricitylagom

@vintagesovnds

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001230194745
Type	Channel
Username	@vintagesovnds
Description	https://secreto.site/id/20229021
Created	Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	12 August 2026
Last confirmed live	13 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/vintagesovnds

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–33 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
12 Aug 2026, 21:00	32	no change
12 Aug 2026, 20:49	32	first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 47
Videos: 4
Links: 3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
⚡	1	33.3%
👍	1	33.3%
🕊	1	33.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2023 to 15 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,442,725 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐦𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐲
@eyblom · 61 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

free unsubs
@apricitylagom · 152 posts Lavishly Maiden, Fatherwyne.
@Authentyc · 1991 post .
@avocouado · 1221 post MOS.
@cautation · 161 post ˓˓ ࣪❁໋ 𝕭𝖑𝖊𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕽𝖔𝖘𝖊.
@deIicatepetals · 101 post fairy of the lake, Enola dallè
@FLEECYNIGHT · 1001 post 𝙗𝙞𝙨𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙙𝙚 𝙡𝙖 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧
@g0ldbr3w · 2291 post 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐬
@Hasterloi · 731 post p
@hhooligans · 561 post 𝘿𝙍𝘼𝙂𝙊𝙉𝘽𝙐𝙕𝙕𝙀𝙍.
@HSHQs · 6981 post 𝐌eticulous ساحر
@marlborored4 · 51 post 𝐒𝐄𝐐𝐔𝐎𝐈𝐀༊*·˚:｡ﾟ
@myosotisly · 621 post canteen
@pastseven · 1521 post 𝙞𝘾𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙 𝙄𝙯𝙝𝙖𝙢
@pecundanghitugua · 1671 post 𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐞𝐧, 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬
@plateresque · 421 post 𝗡𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗘
@RippedTrash · 351 post 𝗔𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗡𝗼𝗼𝗯𝘀: Lost Under Heaven
@sknuckle · 2201 post SourMilkyGo💮
@sourmilky · 241 post Blue Funk
@thevestalsuicide · 451 post 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗡
@TomHollant · 5961 post Night Hunting for Richie
@toxiclex · 511 post 𝒃𝒆𝒃𝑦 𝒅𝒂𝑖𝒍𝑦 🩰 ˚｡
@whataboutbeby · 701 post 𝑶𝒓𝒄𝒖𝒔
@wreckhips · 1711 post free unsubs
@xnxxboyy · 921 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“subs ch baru @apricitylagom” (@vintagesovnds), 32 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vintagesovnds.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.