2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 172–174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 14:31
173
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:03
173
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
20
Videos
2
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
158 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
57
36.1%
🔥
29
18.4%
😱
16
10.1%
👍
12
7.59%
🤩
10
6.33%
😢
8
5.06%
🙏
5
3.16%
😭
4
2.53%
👏
3
1.90%
🤝
3
1.90%
🤯
3
1.90%
🤣
2
1.27%
❤🔥
1
0.633%
👀
1
0.633%
👌
1
0.633%
💅
1
0.633%
😈
1
0.633%
🤔
1
0.633%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 13 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ving_exchange. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2025 to 13 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Коллеги, привет ❤️
За последнее время сильно изменился подход к приёму чеков.
Классические чекеры мошенники уже давно научились обходить.
Большинство из вас усилили процессы:
- уточняете у клиента получение средств
- принимаете чеки напрямую из банка на почту
И это действительно более безопасно.
Но, как показывает опыт нашей команды, опыт тех, кто обращается к нам, даже при таком подходе остаётся один момент - ч…
🔎 Разбор новой мошеннической схемы
❗️В последние дни участились случаи, когда в Telegram вам пишет «клиент», которому нужно обменять крипту, но есть «нюанс» - просят зайти в правый стакан ByBit на USD и написать в чат ордера e-mail, который они же и дают перед этим в тг.
После этого, мол, можно указывать любые свои реквизиты.
Обмен кажется выгодным, 7-10% спреда.
⛔️На этом этапе всё выглядит безобидно, но тут и н…
💬 Ситуация, которую видим почти каждый день:
К нам обращаются, когда апелляция уже запущена, видео из банка уже отправлено - а поддержка вдруг просит его снова 📹
И вот тут начинается самое сложное:
😩 клиент уже не на связи 🤷♂️ или просто не хочет снова записывать видео 😬 а вам нужно “как-то выкручиваться”, чтобы не потерять репутацию
Да, мы берём такие заказы. Мы можем сделать отрисовку с нуля даже по предыдущем…
⚖️ Плохие и хорошие дропы: стартует реабилитация по 161-ФЗ 🚨
Ребята, кажется, лед тронулся 👀 После волны блокировок по 161-ФЗ Центробанк наконец заговорил о реабилитации «невольных дропов» - тех, кто попал под раздачу из-за крипты, а не из-за криминала 💰
💣 Что вообще произошло?
База ЦБ по 161-ФЗ сейчас наполовину состоит из криптовалютчиков. Классическая схема - «треугол» 🔺:
1️⃣ Мошенник разводит жертву и даёт ей …
📢 Важно! Обновление способов оплаты на Bybit P2P
Коллеги, чтобы соответствовать новым требованиям, платформа изменила названия методов оплаты.
Не теряйтесь — вот актуальное соответствие:
💚 Green Card / Local Green → СБЕР
💛 Yellow Card / Local Yellow → ТИНЬКОФФ
🔵 Local Card (Blue) → ВТБ
🔴 Local Card (Red) → АЛЬФА
⛽ Local Card (Gas) → ГАЗПРОМ
✅ СБП — без изменений.
👉 Перед отправкой платежа обязательно уточняйте у…
Мы — твой шанс на успешную апелляцию:
✔️ Любые отрисовки ✔️ Видео ✔️ Опыт решения кейсов
Пиши прямо сейчас на @ving_helper — деньги должны работать, а не висеть в заморозке!
💔 Полгода в ловушке: мошенники обманули бабушку на 27 миллионов
📍 Москва, февраль–август 2025.
Банда телефонных аферистов полгода (!) методично обрабатывала 84-летнюю женщину. Всё началось с безобидного звонка: «Мы сотрудники телефонной компании, нужно заменить код городского телефона». Доверчивая бабушка сообщила паспортные данные… и тут начался настоящий кошмар.
👮♂️ Потом «операторы связи» внезапно стали «сотру…
🚨 Тысячи россиян под следствием из-за банковских карт Казахстана
⚠️ История, которую игнорировать нельзя.
С 2023 года тысячи россиян оформляли банковские карты в Казахстане удалённо — по ИИН и фото паспорта. Всё выглядело «безопасно и удобно» для P2P и крипты.
Но в 2024-м дистанционный выпуск закрыли, а к 2025-му всё превратилось в охоту на «помогаторов» и их клиентов:
👉 более 1000 человек уже вызваны к следовате…
🚨 «ДЕНЕГ НЕ БУДЕТ (сразу)!»
Банки включают морозилку для кредитов 🧊💸
С 1 сентября в России вводят «период охлаждения» для кредитов. Теперь деньги не прилетают мгновенно на счёт — банки жмут пауза ⏳
❄️ Как это работает:
📌 Кредит от 50к до 200к ₽ → деньги только через 4 часа.
📌 Больше 200к ₽ → ждать до 2 суток.
📌 До 50к ₽ или ипотека/автокредит/цель — без паузы.
💡 Зачем всё это:
Мошенники любят давить на жертву: …
❤5🔥5👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ving_exchange. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 679,198 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ving_exchange named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@vingexchange named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VINGexchange_channel” (@ving_exchange), 173 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ving_exchange.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
