Channel
@vinfroid
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003602981771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vinfroid |
| Description | ⲇⲉⲋ ⲓⲛϝⲟʀⲙⲁⲧⲓⲟⲛⲋ ⲋυʀ ⲙⲟⲓ |
| Created | 14 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vinfroid |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 16 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 16 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
190 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 57 | 30.0% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 25.8% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 11.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 8.95% | |
| 💘 | 17 | 8.95% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 5.79% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 2.11% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.58% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.58% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.05% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.05% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 1.05% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.526% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 18 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ⲡⲉⲥⲏя Ⲇⲯⲟⲏⲁ Ⲗⲉⲏⲏⲟⲏⲁ (ⲩⳡⲁⲥⲧⲏυⲕⲁ ⲅⲣⲩⲡⲡы ⲧⲏⲉ Ⲃⲉⲁⲧⳑⲉⲋ) Ⲓⲙⲁⳋⲓⲛⲉ ⲃⲭⲟⲇυⲧ ⲃ ⲧⲟⲡ 50 ⲥⲁⲙыⲭ ⲗⲉⲅⲉⲏⲇⲁⲣⲏыⲭ ⲡⲉⲥⲉⲏ ⲃ ⲙυⲣⲉ. Эⲧⲟ ⲡⲟυⲥⲧυⲏⲉ ⲃⲉⲗυⲕυύ ⳡⲉⲗⲟⲃⲉⲕ, ⲡⲉⲥⲏя ⳝⲩⲇⲉⲧ ⲁⲕⲧⲩⲁⲗьⲏⲁ ⲃⲥⲉⲅⲇⲁ, ⲁ ⲡⲉⲣⲉⲃⲟⲇ эⲧⲟύ ⲡⲉⲥⲏυ ⲕⲁⲯⲇыύ ⲡⲟⲏυⲙⲁⲉⲧ ⲥⲁⲙ ⲇⲗя ⲥⲉⳝя. 🤍 Ⲡⲟⲥⲗⲩⲱⲁύⲧⲉ эⲧⲩ ⲡⲉⲥⲏю υ ⲃы ⲡⲟύⲙⲉⲧⲉ ⲡⲟⳡⲉⲙⲩ ⲯⲉ ⲟⲏⲁ ⲧⲁⲕⲁя ⲕⲩⲗьⲧⲟⲃⲁя. Ⲇⲉⲗυⲧⲉⲥь ⲥⲃⲟυⲙ ⲙⲏⲉⲏυⲉⲙ ⲃ ⲕⲟⲙⲉⲏⲧⲁⲣυυ! 🖤
❤12🔥5🤡3🥰3👍1
🌟
❤4🥰3❤🔥2🤣1
-на удачу⚜️
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥5❤🔥2💘2❤1🤮1
🌟
❤4💘4🔥4❤🔥2👍1👎1🥰1
ⲱⲏⲟ ⲁʀⲉ ⲩⲟυ ⲧⲟ ⲙⲉ?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥5❤🔥4💋3👍1💘1🤣1
🌟
🔥5🎉2🥰2🤮1
🤎.. ⲩⲟυʀ ⲟⲣⲓⲛⲓⲟⲛ ⲧⲟ ⲙⲉ ⲏυⲯⲉ ⲃы ⲙⲟⲯⲉⲧⲉ ⲡⲟⲇⲉⲗυⲧьⲥя ⲗюⳝыⲙ ⲙⲏⲉⲏυⲉⲙ ⲟⳝⲟ ⲙⲏⲉ, ⳝⲩⲇⲩ ⲣⲁⲇ ⲡⲟⲗⲩⳡυⲧь ⲕⲟⲙⲉⲏⲧⲁⲣυύ 🤎
❤4💘4🔥4🥰2
🌟
❤5🔥4😍2
🤩My hobbies: 🤩 ɸυʌ૦ς૦ɸυя: ਡɑⲏυⲙɑюςь ɾ∂૯-੮૦ ∂ɞɑ ɾ૦∂ɑ, ⲏƿɑɞυ੮ςя η૦੮૦ⲙƴ ૫੮૦ ʌюઠʌю ςⲙ૦੮ƿ૯੮ь ⲏɑ ⲙυƿ ς ƿɑਡⲏыⲭ ੮૦૫૯κ ਡƿ૯ⲏυя. 🖤 ηςυⲭ૦ʌ૦ɾυя: ਡɑⲏυⲙɑюςь ς 2021, ⲏƿɑɞυ੮ςя η૦੮૦ⲙƴ ૫੮૦ ⲙⲏ૦ɾ૦ η૯ƿ૯жυʌ, ʌюઠʌю η૦ⲙ૦ɾɑ੮ь υ ςⲙ૦੮ƿ૯੮ь ⲏɑ ∂ƿƴɾυⲭ ʌю∂૯ύ. 🤎 υς੮૦ƿυя: ⲏƿɑɞυ੮ςя ς 5 κʌɑςςɑ, η૦੮૦ⲙƴ ૫੮૦ ૦૫૯ⲏь υⲏ੮૯ƿ૯ςⲏыύ ηƿ૯∂ⲙ૯੮. ʌюઠυⲙы૯ ηƿɑɞυ੮૯ʌυ: ɸƿɑⲏκʌυⲏ ƿƴਡɞ૯ʌь੮, ∂ⲙυ੮ƿυύ ∂૦ⲏςκ૦ύ, ηë੮ƿ 1 υ ૯κɑ੮૯ƿυⲏɑ 2. 🤎 ʌυ੮૯ƿɑ੮ƴƿɑ: ƴɞʌ૯κɑюςь ς 1 κʌɑςςɑ, ૦૫૯ⲏь …
🔥4❤3❤🔥3💋2💘1
🌟
🔥4🥰4❤2
🖤 Պყ ӻձ᥎ჿսᤇ𐌠էᤉ ოս᥉𐌠᥌ձ꤈ ճձከძ᥉ ձከძ ᥉𐌠ከᤚᤉᤇ᥉: Ҟ𐌠ከჿ (ᤇս᥉.), Լ𐌠ӻᤉճսჿყ (ᤇս᥉.), Ⴚ𐌠᥎𐌠꤈ Dᤉӻᤉከ᥉ᤉ (ᤇս᥉.),Ⴕჩᤉ ßᤉձէ꤈ᤉ᥉, 𐌽𐌠ᤇ᥎ձከձ, Ⴓսᤉᤉከ, Ⴚᤇᤉᤉძᤉከ᥌ᤉ Ⴚ꤈ᤉձᤇᤐձէᤉᤇ Քᤉ᥎𐌠᥎ձ꤈, 𐌾ჿ꤈ძᤉከ 𑁗ձᤇᤇ𐌠ከᤚ, Լᤉძ 𑁞ᤉթթᤉ꤈𐌠ከ, ჽჩձᤇ꤈ჿէ (ᤇս᥉.), Պ𐌠ҟჩձ𐌠꤈ Ҟᤇսᤚ (ᤇս᥉.), 𐌀ճճձ, 𐌀᥌ᤉ ჿӻ ßձ᥉ᤉ, ձ-ჩձ, 𑀮ჿᤉ のձ᥉᥉𐌠ከ, Ⴚჩᤇ𐌠᥉ Քᤉձ.
💋4💘4🔥4❤3
🌟
🔥5❤4🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @vinfroid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
-на удачу⚜️
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ⲱⲏⲟ ⲁʀⲉ ⲩⲟυ ⲧⲟ ⲙⲉ?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 18 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,250,238 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vinfroid named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ⲘⲞⲚⲀⲘⲂⲒⲀⲚⲤⲈ” (@vinfroid), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vinfroid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.