Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vinegar.rar📟

@vinegarrar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002888106114
TypeChannel
Username@vinegarrar
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vinegarrar

Growth

609 Aug 2026, 07:15 — 60 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 05:30 — 60 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 07:1510 Aug 2026, 05:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:3060no change
9 Aug 2026, 07:1560first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
138.2%
avg views ÷ 60 subscribers
Avg views / post
82.9
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (27 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total829
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
83
Videos
8
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
38s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

262 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7729.4%
custom 53505204145377965444617.6%
🔥2810.7%
🎉2710.3%
❤‍🔥228.40%
🥰197.25%
💘83.05%
🍓62.29%
🙏62.29%
👍51.91%
🐳41.53%
31.15%
💊31.15%
😨31.15%
💔20.763%
🆒10.382%
💋10.382%
🕊10.382%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 262reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC92 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

#анимашка как же я кринжую с того что раньше рисовала это какой то ужас, как хорошо что на этом канале ещё +- адекватные арты только 🙂

4🎉2💔2

Signed vinegar4ik

1 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC87 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#полноценка #артфайт фоточку делают 😎 о да снова фан персы по бордерлендс ехехе, там столько всяких крутых было что даже жаль что не успела нарисовать больше :_) а ещё это скорее всего моя последняя атака на арт Файт, я за день и 2 часа уже не успею ещё 2 атаки доделать, даже удивлена что вообще сток всего накорябать успела чуть меньше чем за месяц!! (ибо начала не с первого дня арт файта рисовать) теперь снова

🔥4🎉31❤‍🔥1custom 53505204145377965441

Signed vinegar4ik

30 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC68 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#полноценка #артфайт буря мглою небо кроет айм секси энд ай кноу ит мне опять не нравится что получилось чот 😔 автор пепса: AcedItArts

5❤‍🔥3🔥3custom 53505204145377965442

Signed vinegar4ik

28 Jul 2026, 00:46 UTC103 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#полноценка #артфайт Пусть задавит меня панком всё равно умру я танком автор перса: neonwife

custom 53505204145377965447❤‍🔥32🔥2🥰1🆒1

Signed vinegar4ik

26 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC63 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#полноценка (?) #артфайт ода опять атака с кланкером 😋 автор персонажа: StoneDPebble

custom 53505204145377965446🥰4😨3❤‍🔥21

Signed vinegar4ik

22 Jul 2026, 23:52 UTC84 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#полноценка #артфайт наверное это один из моих лучших ревенжей, так ещё и с фан персом по любимай игре 😎 автор перса - SSMP

👍5custom 53505204145377965445🥰4🔥1

Signed vinegar4ik

18 Jul 2026, 01:28 UTC115 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#полноценка #артфайт оу да кланкеры 😇 немножко с стилем и кистями экспериментирую ибо я не нашла в крите кисти что будут похожи на мои старые из ибиса (но зато тут есть другие крутые хехехе) авторы персов: Eggy_Juliee , jellySwag

🔥9🍓5🎉4custom 535052041453779654432🙏1

Signed vinegar4ik

17 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC76 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#полноценка (?) #артфайт Венамечаинэсама собачко мне не очень нравится как получилось ибо фурри я рисовать не умею ноо рисовать ревенжи надо 🥺 автор перса: diggs

custom 53505204145377965445🥰2🙏21

Signed vinegar4ik

17 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC83 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

#анимашка #артфайт у меня приехал провод для графического планшета и теперь хочу на нём делать что то иногда, пока что жесть непривычно 🥺 атака на: Oppinius

custom 535052041453779654452❤‍🔥2🙏1

Signed vinegar4ik

17 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC58 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#дудл #артфайт карочи у меня ещё 3 атаки немножко простенькие готовы, буду их с небольшим промежутком скидывать сюда автор персонажа (и соответственно получатель атаки): tenbirds

❤‍🔥54custom 53505204145377965443🙏2

Signed vinegar4ik

12 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC78 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

#анимашка #артфайт четвертая атака йоу (на самом деле это ревенж) 🤨 вообще это зацикленная гифка но тик ток песенку добавил когда видео выкладывала туда, так чтоо сюда тож с песенкой закину атака на humblepie :D

💘54custom 53505204145377965444❤‍🔥21🎉1

Signed vinegar4ik

10 Jul 2026, 11:52 UTC372 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#Полноценка #артфайт И сегодня сразу же ещё одну атаку выкладываю :] Третья атака адресована тоже на художника которого я знаю - @oakkuku ! 🥺 у неё стиль и персы мега крутые :33

8🔥4🥰3💊2

Signed vinegar4ik

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @vinegarrar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,404,515 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vinegar.rar📟” (@vinegarrar), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vinegarrar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.