Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vincetrading RESULTS🏆

Channel

Vincetrading RESULTS🏆

@vincetradingresults

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

447subscribers

-114 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001952128382
TypeChannel
Username@vincetradingresults
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vincetradingresults

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4475615047 August 2026 — 561 subscribers8 August 2026 — 561 subscribers16 August 2026 — 510 subscribers22 August 2026 — 486 subscribers29 August 2026 — 479 subscribers9 September 2026 — 457 subscribers16 September 2026 — 453 subscribers30 September 2026 — 447 subscribers7 August 202630 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 54 days, net -114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 430–578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 14:00447-6
16 Sept 2026, 23:19453-4
9 Sept 2026, 03:18457-22
29 Aug 2026, 18:25479-7
22 Aug 2026, 16:32486-24
16 Aug 2026, 03:15510-51
8 Aug 2026, 03:34561no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:47561first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤840.0%
🔥840.0%
💯315.0%
👏15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC≈3,340 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Weekly Results 📊 Let’s go 🚀 Great week in the books! Managed to catch some good moves and made some steady profits with the community 🔥🔥 ✅ 9 placed trades ✅ 6 tp hits ✅ Gold stood out the most with 1547 ✅ Total return: 1497 pips Join and take advantage. Send a message and let’s go! @Vincetrading_support📨 On to next week! 📈

❤1

25 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC889 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Weekly Results 📊 We had a steady week, not that much trades but overall a good strikerate and managed to catch some good pips! 🔥 ✅ 10 placed trades ✅ 7 tp hits ✅ Gold stood out the most with 1364 ✅ Total return: 1544 pips Join and take advantage. Send a message and let’s go! @Vincetrading_support📨 On to next week! 📈

🔥2

18 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC≈2,350 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Weekly Results 📊 BENG BENG 🚀🚀 We’re back with a great week! Loved the markets last week and we managed to catch some great profits again! 🔥🔥 ✅ 13 placed trades ✅ 11 tp hits ✅ Gold stood out the most with 3653 ✅ Total return: 3893 pips Join and take advantage. Send a message and let’s go! @Vincetrading_support📨 On to next week! 📈

❤4

11 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC≈1,610 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Weekly Results 📊 We notice that the summer markets are tuned in again. In the summer a lot traders take their time of the charts and you can see that back in the price action, no clear direction and a lot of consolidation. That caused a hard last 2 weeks for us, but we do this for 7 years already so we know it will get better. It’s just the first couple of weeks of summer that we have this kind of price action. Ou…

❤2

4 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,500 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Weekly Results 📊 Transparency is key 🤞 Last week was maybe the worst week since 1 or 2 years, didn’t even end in profit for the week. Those things also can happen in trading, that’s why we always tell you how important it is to manage your risk. The week before was one of our best weeks this year so we are still in profit, so it’s all good! Next week will be a banger again 🚀🚀 ✅ 13 placed trades ✅ 9 tp hits ✅ Gol…

🔥4💯2

27 Jun 2026, 09:15 UTC≈1,050 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Weekly Results 📊 Insaaaane week inside the premium, what a streak! 📈 Only 1 loss and 70% strikerate on TP3, show me another group who does what we do every single week 👀 ✅ 10 placed trades ✅ 9 tp hits ✅ Gold stood out the most with 6450 ✅ Total return: 6450 pips Join and take advantage. Send a message and let’s go! @Vincetrading_support📨 On to next week! 📈

🔥2❤1👏1💯1

20 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,950 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Weekly Results 📊 We’re back! 🚀 Great week inside the premium! A couple losses in between but that’s part of the game. Overall happy with the result! 💪 ✅ 12 placed trades ✅ 9 tp hits ✅ Gold stood out the most with 3090 ✅ Total return: 3265 pips Join and take advantage. Send a message and let’s go! @Vincetrading_support📨 On to next week! 📈

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @vincetradingresults. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vincetrading RESULTS🏆” (@vincetradingresults), 447 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vincetradingresults.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.