Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vilka

@vilka_pvl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

529subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001936297428
TypeChannel
Username@vilka_pvl
Created30 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vilka_pvl

Growth

5295315307 August 2026 — 531 subscribers8 August 2026 — 531 subscribers14 August 2026 — 529 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 529–531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:09529-2
8 Aug 2026, 03:50531no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:02531first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 3 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

596 reactions across 6 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32855.0%
❤‍🔥6410.7%
💋549.06%
💘538.89%
🔥508.39%
🎉122.01%
🕊50.839%
😴50.839%
🥰50.839%
👏40.671%
30.503%
🍓30.503%
👾30.503%
🤩20.336%
🌚10.168%
🏆10.168%
💯10.168%
🙏10.168%
🤗10.168%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 596reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 9 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 May 2026, 17:35 UTC632 views103 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С 9 Мая! Хочу всех поздравить с Днём Великой Победы!🥇 Мне тяжкло смотреть фильмы про Великую Отечественную Войну, потому что наворачиваются слезы(( Желаю всем помнить о подвигах тех, кто воевал тогда за наше мирное небо над головой 🫴🌹 // TW: на первом рисунке немного крови

❤‍🔥5720🎉12🕊5💋3🍓2💘2🏆1

16 Mar 2026, 21:21 UTC792 views89 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лютый пост сборной солянки🤠 Да, меня очень давно не было ребятки, прошу прощения Но решила Я появится видимо не в самое лучшее время... Плавно напоминаю про свой Вк (эх, теперь придется его реально вести и оформлять)

55🔥15💋8💘6👏1👾1💯1🤩1

10 Feb 2026, 21:32 UTC931 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Инфопост! Извиняюсь, даже без должного оформления, в экстренном режиме пишу тут свои другие соц сети (потом нормально пост оформлю) Пинтерест Щп тгк (больше контента)) ВК (прям на КРАЙНИЙ случай, но не думаю, что я буду его вести) Коммишки Анонимка // Хз, вообще слишком привыкла к тгк, не хочу переходить на другие площадки Так что остаюсь тут Если вдруг завтра нам всем перережут кабель в тг (сомневаюсь), то вот мос

38💘13❤‍🔥6🔥5🌚1

6 Feb 2026, 07:58 UTC899 views103 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ребятки, сорян, что пропала на долгое время Сейчас пытаюсь освоиться в новой для меня программе, параллельно совмещая учебу и остатки личной жизни 🥺

66🔥14💘123👾2❤‍🔥1🍓1👏1

9 Jan 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,120 views146 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟Мишка с лошадкой 👩🌟 //Редрав старой работы

86💋33💘16🥰3😴3👏2🔥2🤩1

3 Jan 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,140 views92 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌺🌟⭐️Уилл Байерс⭐️🌟✋ // Изнанка никого не щадит, но мысли о хорошем всегда спасают, ведь так?🤩

63🔥13💋9💘4😴2🥰1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @vilka_pvl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,156,965 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vilka” (@vilka_pvl), 529 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vilka_pvl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.