Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Гаджеты и технологии на Вильянов.Ком

@vilianov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,412subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001031925495
TypeChannel
Username@vilianov
DescriptionОбзоры новой цифровой техники, интересные технологии и полезные факты от Сергея Вильянова. Уже четверть века я делаю так, чтобы купленная техника вас радовала. Заходите на www.vilianov.com Пишите на @SergeyVilianov
Created7 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vilianov

Growth

9,4129,4179,414.55 August 2026 — 9,414 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,414 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,417 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,415 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,412 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,411–9,418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:339,412-3
9 Aug 2026, 21:139,415-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:519,417+3
6 Aug 2026, 02:509,414no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:329,414first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.5%
avg views ÷ 9,412 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,560
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held13 (29 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total36,500
Reactions total1,114
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
549
Videos
13
Links
1,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,660 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍97858.9%
💩20412.3%
17110.3%
🤣16910.2%
😢503.01%
❤‍🔥311.87%
👎140.843%
🤝140.843%
🦄110.663%
🖕100.602%
🫡80.482%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,660reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vilianov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈2,870 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Обожаю мир аудио за то, что там постоянно разбиваются шаблоны. Вроде привык уже к тому, что беспроводные наушники могут радовать, удивлять и защищать от внешних шумов, но все же, когда речь идет о настоящем Звуке, они не дотягивают до хороших проводных. Но вот вышли Focal Bathys MG. И мои представления разлетелись вдребезги! Эти удивительные уши выдают тот самый настоящий Звук по воздуху. И делают это так яростно, ч

👍39❤‍🔥1912💩2

1 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈3,360 views218 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Забавная история случилась у меня позавчера с SSD. В конце прошлого года решил шикануть и поставил в NAS Synology DS923+ два терабайтных SSD для кэширования чтения и записи. Такой объем совершенно избыточен для подобных задач. Но я решил поставить эксперимент. В старом тестовом ноутбуке обнаружился терабайтный SSD с оставшимся ресурсом 72%. Это был Intel 660P Series с 4-битной памятью QLC. Конечно, с шиной PCIe 3.0.

👍127🤣6813😢8💩2

28 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC≈4,840 views187 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Национальный мессенджер расширяет набор инструментов для самовыражения прямо на глазах. Вот вроде только появились комментарии к постам канала в MAX. В первые дни остро не хватало возможности ставить реакции на самые яркие высказывания, но через недельку они появились, теперь все в порядке. С полноценной обратной связью мне гораздо интереснее. А тут в MAX раскатили на всех сториз. Они же истории. И началось. Форма

💩112👍5011🖕8🦄6

28 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC≈4,480 views156 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Был вчера на презентации смартфонов семейства HUAWEI Pura 90s. Их два - Pro и Pro Max. Это наследники прошлогодних Pura 80 Pro и Pura 80 Ultra. Я этим обновлением заинтересовался, потому что аппараты Huawei уже год, как стали для меня важным рабочим инструментом. В качестве основного "фотоаппарата" использую их еще со времен Pura 70 Ultra. А после появления Pura 80 Ultra стал снимать на него и видео. Практически все

👍12822🤣3🫡2🦄1

25 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC≈5,370 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Уверен, что все вы не так давно читали текстовую версию рассказа о сборке второго компьютера из комплектующих с "Авито". Теперь пришел черед видеоверсии. Но! В отличие от прежних времен, это не художественное чтение того же текста, а совершенно новое изложение. Мне самому это немного удивительно, но живой рассказ, пусть и не идеальный по стилю, воспринимается лучше, чем вычитанный и выверенный. По крайней мере, обр

👍79❤‍🔥5🤝3🦄21

23 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC≈5,030 views201 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Интересная история случилась у меня сегодня с Яндекс Такси. Понадобилось утром в Обнинск по делу срочно. Решил ехать туда на такси. С вечера посмотрел, почем нынче поездки в Калужскую область. А приложение Яндекса и говорит: - Вижу, достойный пользователь, что ты намылился в дорогу дальнюю. Не угодно ли сделать предварительный заказ, чтобы точно уехать вовремя и зафиксировать цену поездки? Я подумал - хм, а почему

👍121😢3922💩12🤣7

20 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC≈5,310 views102 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В последнее время стал ловить себя на мысли, что мне трудновато разобраться в многообразии наушников Kennerton. Понятно, что все хорошие. Но какие лучшие лично для меня? И если это сложновато понять мне, весьма внимательно следящему за новинками, то каково нормальному человеку? Чтобы внести ясность, мы встретились с Валентином Казанжи на производстве Kennerton в Петербурге и подробно обсудили весь актуальный модельн

👍6825❤‍🔥7🦄2

18 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC≈5,240 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В тех краях, где я живу, у многих людей есть собаки. А иногда и несколько. Очень уж живописные места, так и хочется с кем-нибудь погулять. А сколько в квартирах живет кошек, даже представить трудно. У этого праздника жизни есть побочка: постоянно на столбах появляются объявления о сбежавшем питомце. Иногда находят сразу, а иногда ищут месяцами - и тщетно. Написал о нескольких новых сервисах, повышающих шансы верну

47👍38👎3

12 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC≈7,080 views115 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Это сага об одном из лучших компьютеров, которые я собирал. Мне давно хотелось что-нибудь компактное и при этом неукротимо мощное. Конечно, проще всего было бы обратиться к Борису Толчинскому, но мне все еще нравится работать руками. И головой. Так получилось, что от предыдущего компьютера, собранного преимущественно из деталей с Авито, у меня остался свободный процессор под LGA1700. Смотрел на него, думал о разном,

👍9413🤝6👎1💩1

11 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC≈6,970 views137 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Меня восхищает талант Сбера делать продукты позже других и совершенно не учитывая ошибки первопроходцев. Вот сейчас модная тема - наличие бензина на АЗС. Первым "топливную карту" сделал Т-Банк. В момент старта проверил - да, действительно работает. Только по одной АЗС на районе не было информации, а в остальном вполне репрезентативно. За Т-Банком подтянулся Яндекс. У него данных для анализа побольше, потому что кро

👍79🤣45💩8😢3🤝2

8 Jul 2026, 07:46 UTC≈7,180 views94 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026

Если вы еще не читали обзор TWS-наушников Яндекс Дропс, самое время его посмотреть. Живьем, с мимикой, жестами и элементами танца, оно повеселее! https://vkvideo.ru/video-95713023_456239125 Также доступно на Rutube и Youtube.

👍45🤣405👎4

2 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC≈7,180 views83 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

В конце июня в мире видеокарт произошло довольно необычное. Компания AMD выпустил драйвер Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2, после установки которого на прошлом поколении ускорителей Radeon RX 7000 заработала технология FSR 4.1. Если вы не очень погружены в технические тонкости, уточню, что на современных ускорителях есть немного жульнические способы выдавать больше кадров в секунду, чем они способны изначально. У Nvidia это

👍69🤣6👎3🤝3💩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @vilianov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,534 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гаджеты и технологии на Вильянов.Ком” (@vilianov), 9,412 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vilianov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.