Channel
@viki_hoodie
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
396subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001657067667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @viki_hoodie |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/viki_hoodie |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 396 | +23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:27 | 373 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 370 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 372 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 372 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
94 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 44.7% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 30.9% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 19.1% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Упрощение - новый тренд. Помните, как мы все раньше ходили по ресторанам и ели сложные блюда (соуса, редиска со вкусом клубники итд), а сейчас сидим в кафешках и радуемся бутерброду с докторской колбасой или просто гречке? Мое наблюдение, что мы все устали от сложных вещей, «двойного дна» и игр в «угадайку». Но если мир вокруг перестроился, то мир подарков и мерча пока не догнало это понимание. Я до сих пор часто …
👍7😎1
Теперь ближе к делу! Этим летом, я переосмыслила то, о чем хочу вести этот канал и что меня вдохновляет. Вижу ценность для себя - делиться знаниями и накопленным опытом. Что будет: - посты про стратегию мерча - немного насмотренности - мои личные инсайты о работе в сфере - знакомство с партнерами, у которых вы можете делать классный мерч А также я в процессе подготовки вебинара на тему «Как делать мерч в эпоху кр…
❤9👍9🔥7
Хэлоу гайз! Давно не виделись) Я честно говоря на лето подзабила на канал, так как выгорела и нужно было время восстановиться и найти новые смыслы. Это связано со многими вещами: много неопределенности, лето в Питере, которое хотелось прожить и почуствовать (кстати, получается!). Сил набралась, вдохновения тоже. Ждите активностей, не переключайтесь. Ваша Вики в худи 🧡
❤12🔥6
Наконец-то добралась посмотреть победителей премии Silver Mercury 2026. Обрадовалась, когда увидела, что золото 🥇 в номинации I03. Лучший мерч для лидеров мнений получил проект Rostic's и BBDO, за который я голосовала. Ребята провели рекламную кампанию с коллекцией мерча, которая стала не просто маленькой частью, а полноценным рабочим инструментом. Как отметили сами ребята: культурно релевантный мерч может стать са…
🔥4👎2👍1
Люблю насохранять всякого для вдохновения.
🔥4
Silver Mercury 2026 уже опубликовали шортлист. На прошлой неделе мы закончили второй этап оценки номинантов и уже в эту пятницу (29 мая) объявят победителей на премии в Москве. За кого голосовала я, смогу рассказать на следующей неделе, а пока хочу поделиться впечатлениями, как участник жюри: 1. Организация сделана на высоком уровне и вам дают заранее весь инструктаж, чтобы понимать как оценивать участников премии.…
🔥8❤4🤩2
Мы довольно открыто делимся всегда нашими партнерами и вообще партнерство в нашей сфере одна из ключевых вещей для успешного проекта. Поэтому, сегодня в день предпринимателя, мы опубликовали пост, с теми, с кем идем уже довольно длительный партнерский путь! Спасибо за партнерство и с днем предпринимателя! 💜
❤8
Предприниматели, с вашим днём! И пусть их в вашем деле будет как можно больше ❤️ Считаем, что этот праздник — хорошая возможность для локального бизнеса стать заметнее. Поэтому с гордостью рассказываем вам о наших любимых поставщиках, которых всем готовы советовать: 🪅 BOOMTS 🪅 ЮНИТ17 🪅 SALOEV 🪅 ТУЛОВО 🪅 BNGL 🪅 Recycle Object 🪅 Ad Marginem 🪅 SuperSocks Выбирайте партнёров для совместной работы и делитесь своими конт…
❤9👍1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @viki_hoodie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вики в худи” (@viki_hoodie), 396 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viki_hoodie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.