Channel
@vikazunke
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
439subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001126862984 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vikazunke |
| Description | рисую комихи и всякую ерунду. сейчас сезон ерунды! посты раз в три дня >:) поддержать материально и получить эксклюзивный контент / ранний доступ к комихам тут: https://boosty.to/zunke |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vikazunke |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 439 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 439 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (2 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,437 |
| Reactions total | 215 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
420 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 147 | 35.0% | |
| 🔥 | 73 | 17.4% | |
| 💘 | 64 | 15.2% | |
| 😍 | 35 | 8.33% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 5.71% | |
| 🤪 | 17 | 4.05% | |
| 😈 | 16 | 3.81% | |
| custom 5314719560023183661 | 14 | 3.33% | |
| 💅 | 14 | 3.33% | |
| 💔 | 10 | 2.38% | |
| custom 5316917655565797655 | 5 | 1.19% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.238% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 420reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
теперь некоторое время мы с вами будем смотреть на картинки сделанныe по персонажам Nastix x)) начнём с господина Саме >:3 есть несколько страничный комикс с этим персонажем, кстати! почитать можно тут: https://globalcomix.com/read/709d4c59-f888-4a5d-969d-01067715a4b9/1 все остальные ссылки на автора: https://nastix-box.super.site
❤12
Соня, теперь у тебя есть кавайная версия Данилы работы Сони можно посмотреть тут: https://vk.ru/kara_nova
💘12❤6
мстительная атака на @darling_eshe 😈 вообще конечно целый челлендж вышел что с фоном, что с цветом кожи Минти, но в итоге кайфанула жестко х)
❤18😍8🔥5
атака на @art_gluk 😎
❤22🔥8👏2💘1
призовая картинка за DTIYS для @knownasbell ❤️🔥
💘16❤9😍4👏1custom 53169176555657976551
штош, спустя почти пять месяцев постов раз в три дня у меня нет никакого поста кроме этого 🤩 немного думаю слезать с текущего режима публикаций под предлогами «я немного устала» и «если я сейчас скроюсь из инфополя, я попаду в настоящую писательскую нору» ахаха, но это пока просто мысли х)
💔10❤9👏3👀1
я наконец-то доварила в голове (и по большей части в раскадровке) вторую главу Агаты! ловлю себя на чуть странных отношениях с этапом раскадровки -- я очень люблю чувство, когда все наконец складывается, но чтобы туда прийти приходится довольно долго потеть <:) не знаю даже, станет ли от большего количества опыта и знаний легче, впервые задумалась, что, может, это просто сама по себе тяжелая работа и там без варианто…
custom 531471956002318366114💘8custom 53169176555657976554❤2👏2
очередная артфайт картинка, персонажик @lophiuspiscatorius :з
❤23😍7💘5👏2
ещё картинка на артфайт, персонаж barreloid >:3c
🤪17🔥13❤5
картинка с персонажами princehoneytea на артфайт 💪 у них очень жесткие и местами криминальные бекстори, но мне так сильно понравились дизайны, что решила их таки нарисовать села порисовать утром в воскресенье часик, очухалась в четыре вечера когда оно уже было дорисованным 😮💨
💅14❤6💘3👏1
после очень долгих размышлений выбрала наконец своего любимчика из DTIYS, и это @knownasbell 🎉 не расстраивайтесь, если вы не оказались выбранными, вас правда очень-очень много с крутыми работами, а я одна :___з отсекла ещё из списка потенциальных победителей всех своих друзей, потому что я и так вам что-нибудь нарисую, а ещё не хотелось демонстрировать, что работа какого-то моего дружочка якобы лучше другого моего …
💘14😍8👏7🔥5
финальная подборка картинок на DTIYS! авторы в порядке появления: @vestalspiritart @lyckostart @skulliexx @violikh kyssaki в запрещенной сети с картинками @Logovo_Hoshi_UvU спасибо огромное всем кто участвовал! я безмерно тронута тем, что вы взялись за интерпретацию моей картинки, проявили креативность, провели с ней время и довели работу до конца! я видела что для некоторых это первый такой ивент, и это так здоров…
🔥15😍8💘5👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @vikazunke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 392,707 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vikazunke named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“зуня рисует” (@vikazunke), 439 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vikazunke.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.