5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,697–8,838 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 08:16
8,713
-4
12 Aug 2026, 23:35
8,717
-64
10 Aug 2026, 01:41
8,781
-41
7 Aug 2026, 08:25
8,822
+63
6 Aug 2026, 19:17
8,759
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.37%
avg views ÷ 8,713 subscribers
Avg views / post
380
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
16 (30 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
5,706
Reactions total
285
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
285 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
164
57.5%
🔥
43
15.1%
👍
41
14.4%
✍
14
4.91%
custom 5224299464671384710
13
4.56%
👌
5
1.75%
🎉
2
0.702%
🤝
2
0.702%
👏
1
0.351%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vikanovikowa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
12.5%
2 of 16 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
360
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
464
over 13 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzquhHQAW
1
3 August 2026
3 August 2026
2VtzqvEEbU7
1
9 August 2026
9 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Новолуние сегодня, девочки!
А, значит, пришло время распаковать новенькие метафорические карты и заглянуть внутрь себя ✨
🃏🃏🃏🃏
В этот раз у меня в руках «Психологический оракул», созданный для поиска причин и внутренних барьеров, мешающих достижению любых ваших целей / мечт / состояний☺️
Напоминаю, что это не гадание, а работа с подсознанием. Все ответы есть в нас самих, карты (и я с вашего позволения) — лишь прово…
В выходной мы с Семёном идём на день рождения мальчишки 6 лет. Конечно, берём с собой желанный конструктор лего, набор вкусняшек и книги📚
Родители попросили найти что-то для расчитки, так как азы малыш уже освоил, но дальше дело идёт соооовсем туго. И я была бы не я, если не нашла крутой вариант, аналогичный тому, который и Семёну помог в своё время💛
Наборы «Букли» издательства «Грамота» — это разноуровневые малень…
Через 6 дней у меня день рождения. В этом году настроения нет совсем, медицинские вопросы меня измотали в край. Пришлось даже отменить запланированную давно поездку в места силы…😔 Но какой-то радости всё равно же нужно, да?😅
Поделитесь, чем себя радовали вы, что как-то особенно вам запомнилось или понравилось? Может, купили себе чего. Или куда-то съездили… Нужны свежие и классные идеи!🫶
А я поделюсь своим вишлистом…
Когда я приняла решение обучаться на семейном, вопросов было больше, чем ответов. По-началу🙏
И самое сложное — не само решение идти нестандартным путём без школы. Самое сложное — понять, как всё устроить так, чтобы ребенок получил хорошее образование, а семья не превратилась в бесконечную проверку уроков.
Сейчас, когда Семён успешно несколько лет учится на семейном, и я все больше понимаю, что у родителей есть выбо…
Несколько недель назад я делилась с вами размышлениями Василины Шишкиной о том, что выбор образования начинается не со школы, а с ответа на вопрос:
"Каким человеком я хочу видеть своего ребёнка через много лет?" Теперь этот разговор становится гораздо более практичным.
В августе Василина запускает серию открытых эфиров, посвящённых детям разных возрастов - от первого года жизни до совершеннолетия.
🤍Почему трёхлетка…
Сегодня, оказывается, Всемирный день книголюба! А я чуть не пропустила📚
Предлагаю устроить в комментариях маленький интерактив:
☝️ напишите возраст ребёнка и название книги, которая оооочень зацепила вашего юного читателя за последние полгода
☝️ можно написать несколько, но каждая новая книга — новый комментарий
☝️ в среду, 12 августа, выберу из всех комментариев один и отправлю любую вашу книжную хотелку по рф в…
Я не хочу давить на ребёнка, но как иначе?
С одной стороны, не хочется превращаться в человека, который постоянно напоминает, проверяет и заставляет. Но стоит немного отойти в сторону - ребенок откладывает учебу, забывает о договоренностях и снова выбирает телефон.
И ведь это не просто переживания из-за несделанной домашки. Мы волнуемся о том, как ребенок будет справляться со своей жизнью: учиться, развиваться, пре…
Мамочки, сентябрь уже прямо ощущаю в воздухе… а у вас как?
Мы с Семёном хоть и не оставляем учёбу на лето, но новый учебный год всё равно тревожит… новый класс, новый этап, новый уровень. Вдруг чего упустили🤔
Я решила, что в этот раз перед составлением образовательного плана, мы посмотрим сторонними глазами, почему Семёну бывает сложно без моего контроля. Ну и слабые места выявить🙏 Поэтому записала его на бесплатну…
Ну как можно было пройти мимо книги Ольги Ламзиной (я взяла ещё по предзаказу, вот здесь писала об этом), с которой Семён годом ранее осваивал уникальные и меняющие сознание курсы?❤️ Никак! Невозможно не забрать в домашнюю библиотеку творение человека, кто создаёт такие крутые проекты для детей.
Конечно, ожидаемо, книга получилась восхитительной☺️ Про необычную дружбу, принятие других такими, какие они есть, про важ…
Итак, математика у нас остаётся самым сложным предметом, и на новый учебный год я активно присматриваю помощь извне. Спасибо всем, кто откликнулся, несколько человек в лс написали свои рекомендации🙏
Рассказываю, к чему пришла.
Для меня важный критерий — есть структура или нет. Вы знаете мой пунктик: не галопам по Европам, а как бусины на ниточке👌🏻 От простого к сложному, от основ к расширению, чтобы одна тема цепля…
У Семёна летний прогресс и новая ступень в английском: теперь он развлекается тем, что болтает с друзьями на иностранном во время прогулок. У ребят, конечно, у всех разный уровень, но такой формат нравится большинству. Как взрослые и всё понимающие, они пытаются встроить язык в свою естественную среду😁
Многие, у кого лишь школьные знания, сначала пасуют и стесняются применять иностранную речь, но Семён очень настойч…
❤15🔥6👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @vikanovikowa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 110,835 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Облегчаю жизнь мамам” (@vikanovikowa), 8,713 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vikanovikowa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
