🗝 Tas ir biedējoši, kad nāve kļūst par ikdienu. / Ē. M. Remarks
🔔 Ikvienam ir tiesības uz vārda brīvību- brīvi iegūt, paturēt un izplatīt informāciju, paust uzskatus.
Par lietām, ko nestāsta uzpirktās sipenieces,sprinģes, bogustovi, sorosītu mēdiji.
Created
25 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 644–645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 02:47
645
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:13
645
+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:03
644
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.4%
avg views ÷ 645 subscribers
Avg views / post
228
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (16 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
4,340
Reactions total
75
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,550
Videos
≈2,300
Links
≈3,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
76 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
69
90.8%
❤
4
5.26%
👀
1
1.32%
👍
1
1.32%
💯
1
1.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Kas kopīgs saranča uzlidojumiem un Spānijas notikumiem? 🆘 07.08.2026.
Lindsija Grēma pēkšņā nāvīte.
Vai beidzot pierādīs apsūdzības Dr. Faučī (Gebelss) par C-19 afēru?
Vadošā ASV sporta apskatnieka Stīvena A. Smita patiesā atvainošānās NBA basketbola zvaigznei Kairijam Īrvingam par C-19 nāves dziras nepieņemšanu.
‘'Patriot'' raķešu rūpnīca Ukrainā?
Cīņa par Melno jūru. Slīcina kuģus, bet ''zaļie’’ klusē.
Spridzin…
📍📍📍 Briseles un Vašingtonas strīdos galvenais zaudētājs būs iedzīvotājs parastais!
Arī pensim Godainim, ja gribēs, ko lietot būs jāpiereģistrējās un jāpierāda savs vecums!
Totāla kontrole uzņem apgriezienus!
https://youtu.be/xYhMrLiOXuM
🆘🆘🆘 Cilvēki nepirktu sūdus un nebūtu problēmas. Nebūtu arī šādu smirdīgu ražotāju!
Cik vnk.
Par milku, bērnu kinder u.c. globālistu izstrādājumiem.
https://youtu.be/wRTN4P38z98
❗️ Vēsture. 1992.gads.
Ukrainas - Krievijas attiecības. Melnās jūras kara flote…
Anatolijs Sobčaks, gudrs, saprātīgs vīrs (nez no kādas ratu pakaļas meita iznira).
Interesanti 8.min. stāsta par robežām. - pirms un pēc. Ļoti loģiski.
https://youtu.be/1WMq-8bsuro
Jumis un Raiņa trimdas darbs ’’Gals un sākums’’ 🌿 Saruna ar Irēnu Saprovsku 05.08.2026. uz pl.19.15
Irēna Saprovska mums pastāstīs par 08.08. Jumja dienu un brīnišķīgo Raiņa darbu ’’Gals un sākums’’, kas radīts tālajā 1912.gadā,. "Gals un sākums” visticamāk būtu jāsauc par Krievijas un nevis Latvijas literāro darbu, jo, kā zināms, 1912.gadā Latvija kā valsts vēl neeksistēja.
Vai alternatīvi šo literāro darbu var…
📍📍📍 Sarunu, kuru noteikti vērts dzirdēt!
Izbijuši izlūkdienesta darbinieki vienmēr ir lietas kursā virs vidējā aritmētiskā!
https://youtu.be/I0CvVNjaKLw
ПИАРЯТ ПАРНИ ДРАКУ 🎶 Kaspars Dimiters 31.07.2026.
Kārtējā lieliskā Kaspara Dimitera dziesma. Ieklausieties dziļajā tekstā!
Tā uzrakstīt vajag mācēt!
Тут парни глубоко зашли
В зону невозврата.
Чёрный вирус-код нашли,
Брат чтоб шёл на брата.
Политика — могила тут.
Культура вся почила.
С лопатами нас парни ждут.
Вместе мы им сила.
Тут парням хочется войны.
Свет ползёт ко мраку.
Народа стены не двойны —
Не полезем …
‘'Panorāmā'' to nestāstīs! 🆘 Sprādzienbīstamie MK Ultra projekti 29.07.2026. MK Ultra projects
MK-ULTRA pārskats
MK-ULTRA bija nelegāla cilvēku eksperimentu programma, ko CIP veica no 1953. līdz 1972. gadam. Programmas mērķis bija izstrādāt prāta kontroles metodes, un tajā bija iekļautas dažādas metodes cilvēku uzvedības manipulēšanai.
MK-ULTRA galvenās iezīmes
▴ Ilgums: no 1953. līdz 1972. gadam (nu, nu!)
…
📍📍📍 Interesants stāsts!
FBI ietekmē “mākslu”. Modernā māksla, kas pamatos ir totāls mēsls galēji izrūnītām smadzenēm. Tomēr cilvēki pērk par baisiem miljoniem un Karīna savās mītnes vietās.
https://youtu.be/a2kTaHD-9sQ
Vārda brīvība Eva Lotte Luīze Vlārdingerbruka apsūdz Briseles mafiju! 🆘 24.07.2026.
Prieks, ka kāds cīnās arī tavā vārdā! Cīnās par vārda brīvību, patiesību! Pret nelietībām, apspiešanu!
Nestāvi malā, negaidi, kad kāds cits visu paveiks tavā vietā!
Tā vienkārši nemēdz notikt!
Eva Lotte Luīze Vlārdingerbruka ir Nīderlandes politiskā komentētāja un aktīviste. Viņa ir īpaši skaļi paudusi viedokli par lauksaimniek…
📍📍📍 Kristīne Andersone par C-19 afēru.
Daļa cilvēces modusies!
https://youtu.be/f8t3Oe1e7Ok
🔥3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vienatante. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 150,221 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Viena Tante teica” (@vienatante), 645 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vienatante.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.