Photo, posted without a caption
❤10😢4

Channel
@videobastard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
254subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001939122279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @videobastard |
| Description | youtube.com/@videobastard Аккаунт для связи: @vladlugovsky |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/videobastard |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 254 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (18 December 2025 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 139 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
330 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 148 | 44.8% | |
| 👍 | 81 | 24.5% | |
| custom 5370621059051560318 | 68 | 20.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 4.55% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 3.03% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 1.21% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.21% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 330 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10😢4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hROQOKB2IvE Лол, тем временем вышел новый эпизод Walten Files на полтора часа!
❤17custom 53706210590515603181
Photo, posted without a caption
❤15
Помните серию йоба-фильмов "Зловещие мертвецы"? Олдскульная трилогия вообще считается классикой хорроров (хотя, как по мне, сейчас она уже сильно устарела). Но не все знают, что новые части этой серии вообще-то выходят до сих пор. И некоторые из них - реально очень качественное зрелище. "Зловещие мертвецы: Чёрная книга" 2013 года - вообще стал одним из моих любимых слэшеров евер. Если ищете жуткий и кровавый хоррор …
custom 53706210590515603188👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍12❤5
Photo, posted without a caption
👍34❤3custom 53706210590515603182❤🔥1
Вчера ночью ютуб начал подкидывать мне всякие инфернальные рекомендации, и среди них мой взгляд зацепился за одно видео. Это какой-то фанатский ролик на тему старого доброго мишке фреди, но не из серии заебавшего всех FNaF VHS, а кое-что гораздо более криповое и хтоническое. Некоторые описывают это как "фентаниловый хоррор", что является довольно точным описанием. Этот видос действительно оказался одним из самых мощн…
custom 537062105905156031812❤6❤🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥9❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
👍9🗿2❤1
Лол, отправили на удачу трейлер игры на почту в IGN и они согласились разместить его на своем канале. Толку от этого не очень много, но забавно что сработало. В любом случае буду благодарен, если посмотрите и поддержите лайкосом, кому не лень 👍🏿 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyzqP0NnOVg P.S. Думаю выпущу в скором времени, небольшой видос, на старый-добрый канал, где вкратце расскажу что и как происходило во время…
❤16
Всем спасибо за участие! По итогам справедливого голосования победил этот вариант
😁9❤7custom 53706210590515603183
Какой вариант лучше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @videobastard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой вариант лучше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VideoBastard” (@videobastard), 254 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/videobastard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.