Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VideoBastard

Channel

VideoBastard

@videobastard

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

293subscribers

+39 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001939122279
TypeChannel
Username@videobastard
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/videobastard

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

252293272.518 September 2026 — 254 subscribers29 September 2026 — 252 subscribers18 October 2026 — 255 subscribers24 October 2026 — 286 subscribers31 October 2026 — 292 subscribers8 November 2026 — 293 subscribers18 September 20268 November 2026
6 measurements spanning 52 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 246–299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 20:10293+1
31 Oct 2026, 18:29292+6
24 Oct 2026, 13:08286+31
18 Oct 2026, 05:46255+3
29 Sept 2026, 22:40252-2
18 Sept 2026, 02:22254first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

330 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14844.8%
👍8124.5%
custom 53706210590515603186820.6%
❤‍🔥154.55%
😁103.03%
🗿41.21%
😢41.21%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 330 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC139 views14 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤10😢4

1 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC297 views18 reactionsread 18 September 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hROQOKB2IvE Лол, тем временем вышел новый эпизод Walten Files на полтора часа!

❤17custom 53706210590515603181

20 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC283 views10 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Помните серию йоба-фильмов "Зловещие мертвецы"? Олдскульная трилогия вообще считается классикой хорроров (хотя, как по мне, сейчас она уже сильно устарела). Но не все знают, что новые части этой серии вообще-то выходят до сих пор. И некоторые из них - реально очень качественное зрелище. "Зловещие мертвецы: Чёрная книга" 2013 года - вообще стал одним из моих любимых слэшеров евер. Если ищете жуткий и кровавый хоррор …

custom 53706210590515603188👍2

27 Jun 2026, 11:16 UTC331 views17 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍12❤5

1 Jun 2026, 11:27 UTC462 views40 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍34❤3custom 53706210590515603182❤‍🔥1

22 Apr 2026, 11:54 UTC586 views20 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Вчера ночью ютуб начал подкидывать мне всякие инфернальные рекомендации, и среди них мой взгляд зацепился за одно видео. Это какой-то фанатский ролик на тему старого доброго мишке фреди, но не из серии заебавшего всех FNaF VHS, а кое-что гораздо более криповое и хтоническое. Некоторые описывают это как "фентаниловый хоррор", что является довольно точным описанием. Этот видос действительно оказался одним из самых мощн…

custom 537062105905156031812❤6❤‍🔥2

11 Apr 2026, 11:45 UTC524 views15 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥9❤6

1 Apr 2026, 12:05 UTC585 views12 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍9🗿2❤1

12 Mar 2026, 11:23 UTC523 views16 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Лол, отправили на удачу трейлер игры на почту в IGN и они согласились разместить его на своем канале. Толку от этого не очень много, но забавно что сработало. В любом случае буду благодарен, если посмотрите и поддержите лайкосом, кому не лень 👍🏿 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyzqP0NnOVg P.S. Думаю выпущу в скором времени, небольшой видос, на старый-добрый канал, где вкратце расскажу что и как происходило во время…

❤16

7 Mar 2026, 09:31 UTC406 views19 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Всем спасибо за участие! По итогам справедливого голосования победил этот вариант

😁9❤7custom 53706210590515603183

6 Mar 2026, 18:53 UTC402 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Poll

Какой вариант лучше?

  1. Первый46%
  2. Второй45%
  3. Оба не очень9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @videobastard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Mar 2026, 18:53 UTCAnonymous Poll87 voters

Какой вариант лучше?

  1. Первый46%
  2. Второй45%
  3. Оба не очень9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Канал 2504
@Nikita2504tg · 23,536
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VideoBastard” (@videobastard), 293 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/videobastard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.