Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вика пишет

@vickdori

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

379subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002214346237
TypeChannel
Username@vickdori
Description~ учу, учусь, путешествую и живу жизнь занятия по английскому/сотрудничество/реклама: @mre0w
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vickdori

Growth

3797 Aug 2026, 15:41 — 379 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 379 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:418 Aug 2026, 06:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:16379no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:41379first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 379 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.4
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total784
Reactions total240
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
562
Videos
41
Links
48

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

240 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘5422.5%
❤‍🔥5322.1%
🍓4217.5%
4016.7%
🕊2610.8%
💋208.33%
🆒41.67%
🙊10.417%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC52 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍂🍂 // 🍂🍂 чем ближе осень, 🍂🍂тем ближе мой прайм

💘10💋6❤‍🔥3🍓1

6 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC67 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

надеюсь, станцую когда-нибудь это в Корее на фоне здания хайба…🙏🏻 пока только так (можете поддержать в тикитоке лайком? ихихихих, ну а что я зря танцевала в жаре это что ли)

13❤‍🔥6💘5🍓2💋1🙊1

5 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC69 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

в понедельник сходили на ещё один вид йоги – хатха 🧘‍♀️☀️ опять преисполнилась. и даже сильнее, чем в первый раз на гамаках(хатха оказалась тяжелее) мне прям понравилось, что йога учит следить за дыханием и чувствовать своё тело. ты все также занимаешься спортом, но обращаешь внимание на неочевидные вещи. ещё, когда я в ходила в зал/делала типичные тренировки дома/бегала мне не было классно в моменте и я чувствовал

9❤‍🔥6🕊3🍓2💘1

3 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC86 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

криво-косо, но на память сохранить тут хочется 🥹

❤‍🔥17🍓8💘73🆒2💋1

3 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC97 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

учу корейский уже немного больше полугода и знаю, что тут есть те, кому это тоже прям интересно 😇 по корейскому не так много материалов и преподавателей, особенно ведущих каналы, как по английскому, поэтому хочу с вами поделиться одной своей находкой, которая мне до сих пор, с самого моего начала, помогает(готовлюсь к октябрьскому топику, а там есть по нему бесплатные материалы!!) 🙌юз канала – @getkorean девушка-в

💋10💘6❤‍🔥41🍓1

2 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC88 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

в посте выше я говорила, что стала почётным репортёром Южной Кореи 🤌🏻🇰🇷 (я, конечно, рада, но не от всего сердца аххахахах) вообще, всё правда не так радужно и классно, как звучит. но об этом я расскажу вам немного позже)))))) к ОГРОМНЕЙШЕМУ сожалению, мои статьи не выходят на сайте korea.net(в открытый доступ) из-за чего я просто не могу поделиться ни с кем ссылкой внутреннего сайта(он находится под защитой пароля

💘10❤‍🔥5🕊4🍓21

1 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC74 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

сегодня получился практически выходной день 🙏 • провела урок с ученицей • покаталась с братом час на самокате • дописала посты для новой рубрики для МДКМ и скинула их на рассмотрение • просто отдыхала, ничего не учила даже по корейскому(но впереди ещё целый вечер хихихихи) как ваши дела???

8🕊5🍓4🆒2

31 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC88 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

ОЧЕНЬ смешно нам было и ОЧЕНЬ классно тоже!! мы такие тут синхронизированные лапульки 🥺 честно говоря, никогда не понимала особо йогу, она казалась мне странной и какой-то «не моей». но мне ж всё-таки было интересно попробовать на себе что-то новенькое)) поэтому мы записались на три пробных занятия на два вида – йога на гамаках и хатха йога* всё занятие было очень вайбовым – музычка(с какими-то индийскими мотивами,

🕊9❤‍🔥6🍓5

31 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC81 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌫️🌫️// 🧘сходила с 🌫️🌫️подружкой впервые на йогу(на гамаках) со всякими прикольными благовониями, расслабляющей музыкой и чаем с пряностями после тренировки словила лютый дзен и теперь понимаю людей, любящих йогу… такой experience мне нравится

💘13❤‍🔥6🍓5🕊1

31 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC82 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

возможно для кого-то это будет знак) 🫶

🍓125🕊4💋2💘2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @vickdori. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 244,370 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вика пишет” (@vickdori), 379 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vickdori.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.