Channel
@viakh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
63subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004397312335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @viakh |
| Created | 24 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/viakh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 63 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 61 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (24 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,484 |
| Reactions total | 76 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
76 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5469850029248253831 | 16 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5332454510780503478 | 14 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5467547681964468972 | 14 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5321281368108343946 | 9 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5339576026118790275 | 8 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5371076123721511638 | 8 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5314668415552603420 | 5 | 6.58% | |
| custom 5440595598245926101 | 2 | 2.63% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @viakh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
𖡻 ˖ 🍡🔤 「静かな夜にも、心の中には小さな光がある。」 . 。 ⋆ ׅıּ ֗ . 🔤ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑜𝑤𝑛 𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 ࣪ ׅ ، ➛ ⌞ 𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒔 :: должны поставить 🔤 в комментарии и реакцию. ⌝ ˖ . ִ࣪ ࣪ ׅ ˖ ་ ، # 𝑆𝐴𝐾𝑈𝑅𝐴 ִ࣪ # ׁ// # бс ׅ #🤩 ׁ
custom 54675476819644689725custom 53324545107805034782custom 53395760261187902752custom 53146684155526034201custom 53212813681083439461custom 53710761237215116381custom 54405955982459261011custom 54698500292482538311
ищем админа по видео !!!
🔤🔤🤩𝐷𝐴𝑍𝑍𝐿𝐼𝑁𝐺 🔤𝑆𝐴𝐾𝑈𝑅𝐴 с этого дня наши конференции связаны союзом. насколько крепкой окажется эта нить, покажет лишь время. мы искренне рады началу нашего сотрудничества и надеемся, что оно перерастёт в долгую, тёплую дружбу. пусть этот союз станет началом множества ярких идей.
custom 53212813681083439463custom 53324545107805034782custom 53395760261187902752custom 53710761237215116382custom 54698500292482538312
жду анонимкии. 🤏🏻
custom 53324545107805034782custom 54698500292482538312custom 53710761237215116381custom 54405955982459261011custom 54675476819644689721
🪽𝑨𝑳𝑳𝑰𝑨𝑵𝑪𝑬𝑺 𝑾𝑰𝑻𝑯 𝑼𝑺🦋 🔤. заключаем только союзы 1:1. сотрудничество длится одну неделю, а рп держим 1 час в канале. 🔤. заключаем союзы только с конференциями, которые готовы к рп / реакциям. 🔤. за ведение и контроль союзов отвечает владелица — виола. 🌟よろしくお願いします。🪷 SWEET #𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐇𝐈𝐏
custom 53146684155526034204custom 53710761237215116382custom 54698500292482538312custom 53324545107805034781custom 54675476819644689721
🤩🤩🤩 🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩🤩🤩 если вам неудобно открыто поделиться своим мнением об участниках, работе конференции или администрации, вы можете написать свои пожелания, предложения или отзывы здесь. мы будем рады прочитать каждое сообщение. если вы не против, мы можем опубликовать его анонимно. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 VIOLA ANNOUNCEMENT
custom 54675476819644689723custom 54698500292482538313custom 53212813681083439462custom 53324545107805034781custom 53395760261187902751
Sticker, posted without a caption
規則および規定 #𝟕𝟕𝟕𝟕𝟔 • Уважайте друг друга. Запрещены оскорбления, унижения и насмешки над вкусами, интересами, внешностью, убеждениями и личными особенностями участников. • Если человеку неприятен ваш стиль общения или шутки, не переходите границы. Уважайте чужой комфорт и личные границы. • Любые проявления дискриминации, осуждения или оскорбления по признаку религии, национальности, ориентации, внешности и другим прич…
custom 54698500292482538314custom 53395760261187902752custom 54675476819644689722
Sticker, posted without a caption
⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🪷 𝑂𝑊𝑁𝐸𝑅 - @miakxkkw 喜んでいただけて嬉しいです 🪷 🔤𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛 — @d1zenn 🪷 🔤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛 — @k11tt33n 🪷 🔤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛 — 🪷 🔤𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛 — @wwiillyu 🪷 🔤𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑜𝑛 𝑛𝑒𝑤 — 🪷🔤𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛 — @nelyaii
custom 53324545107805034783custom 53710761237215116382custom 54698500292482538312custom 53212813681083439461custom 53395760261187902751
Sticker, posted without a caption
⭐️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 𝑁𝑂𝑅𝑀 命 𝑅𝑈𝐿𝐸𝑆 🌸 𝑇𝐼𝐾 𝑇𝑂𝐾 𝐶𝐻𝐴𝑇 命 𝐴𝐷𝑀𝐼𝑁𝐼𝑆𝑇𝑅𝐴𝑇𝐼𝑂𝑁 🌸𝐴𝑅𝐶𝐻𝐼𝑉𝐸 с этого дня имя «нежность сакуры», которым названа наша конференция в честь одного из прекрасных парков японии, принадлежит именно нам. надеюсь, здесь вам будет уютно, а время, проведённое вместе с нами, подарит только тёплые эмоции. добро пожаловать - я искренне рада видеть каждого из вас.
custom 53324545107805034783custom 53212813681083439462custom 54675476819644689722
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @viakh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 211,914 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@viakh named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐼𝑁𝐹𝑂 𝑆𝐴𝐾𝑈𝑅𝐴'𝑆 𝑇𝐸𝑁𝐷𝐸𝑅𝑁𝐸𝑆𝑆” (@viakh), 63 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viakh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.