Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 新人优优的日常

Channel

新人优优的日常

@vfg3566

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

751subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003202528507
TypeChannel
Username@vfg3566
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 8 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vfg3566

Growth

75121 Aug 2026, 13:15 — 751 subscribers21 Aug 2026, 14:18 — 751 subscribers21 Aug 2026, 13:1521 Aug 2026, 14:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 750–752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 14:18751no change
21 Aug 2026, 13:15751first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 8 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.266%
avg views ÷ 751 subscribers
Avg views / post
2.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held15 (8 January 202620 August 2026)
Views total2
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 01:31 UTC5 viewsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @SHDD333

💃老师:#优优 🤖链接:https://t.me/shanghaidadao/10686 💒位置:#浦东 ------------------ 💌出击报告:一坐到床边就凑过来kiss,不是简单的碰触,而是直接伸舌头进来。吻得很深,节奏却不急,时而用力吸吮,时而只用舌尖轻轻挑,津液交换得又湿又响。她会在换气的间隙用气音说话,内容全是花式调情,从夸我到描述她自己现在的感觉,一句比一句直接。手也没闲着。漫游顺着吻的节奏往下走,掌心在胸口、腰侧、大腿内侧来回游移,力道跟她说的话匹配——讲到露骨的时候手就加重力道,讲到软的时候就变成轻刮。整个过程吻、手、和那些骚话一直缠在一起,密得几乎没有空隙。花式调情的密集输出、kiss的深、漫游的配合,把人从进门到完全进入状态的时间压得很短。结束时她还贴在我耳边补了最后一句,才慢慢退开,嘴角还亮着。

13 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC8 viewsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @SHDD333

💃老师:#优优 🤖链接: https://t.me/shanghaidadao/10686 💒位置:#浦东 ------------------ 💌出击报告:胸部足有36D,触感又软又弹,弹性十足。一见面她就甜甜地笑着,声音软糯,主动贴上来kiss,舌吻湿热缠绵,吻得我全身发烫,氛围瞬间拉满。进入正题后,先进行了69。优优技术娴熟,口技细腻有力,舌头灵活地包裹舔弄,同时下面也湿润敏感,我吃她的时候她会轻轻颤抖并发出诱人的娇喘,双方都爽到腿软,配合度极高。胸推环节是最大亮点!她涂上润滑液后,用丰满的胸部紧紧夹住我,上下滑动,力度和速度掌握得恰到好处,软肉包裹的快感无与伦比,视觉冲击力极强,我差点当场忍不住。口💥服务更是专业到极致。无套深喉毫不勉强,吸吮力度适中,时而温柔舔弄龟头,时而大力吞吐,眼神还一直勾着我看。最后口爆时她全程含着,一滴不漏地吞下,清理得干干净净,态度认真又色气。整个过程优优都非常主动热情,聊天自然,服务中不断询

31 Mar 2026, 13:39 UTC73 viewsread 21 August 2026

【出击报告】[https://t.me/shdadao1] 【老师艺名】优优 【联系方式】 @lala2643222 【所在位置】浦东 【验证留名】世纪帅哥 【验证时间】3月30日 【颜值身材】9 【服务内容】内容很多,自己看课表。 【服务态度】10 【优点缺点】优点太多 【推荐程度】放心冲 【体验细节】在榜上看见不错的老师,可约状态,报着试试的态度交了上门费。见到真人发现果然是嫩妹,肤白、颜值在线。果断交了2p水费。老师一起洗了澡,稍微调情就开始做了,看出是才开课不久,服务态度还有提升空间。但是看着老师雪白肤色,饱满的玉峰,小弟就很坚挺。戴上小伞就开始了,老师不机车,很配合,正面一顿输出后开始后入,老师有点害羞,叫声不大。但是身材不错,后入很爽,屁股上的肉刚刚好,在猛烈撞击中顺利出货。歇了一会,跟老师聊聊天,看看电视。又开始第二次,过程还是很爽,就是老师的姿势有待开发。两次都是我输出,感觉今天运动量够了。喜欢嫩妹的冲就行

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @vfg3566. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 513,763 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“新人优优的日常” (@vfg3566), 751 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vfg3566.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.