Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vexraes

Channel

vexraes

@vexraes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

70subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002144698325
TypeChannel
Username@vexraes
Descriptioninst: t.zarenkovaa
First recorded29 September 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vexraes

Growth

7029 Sept 2026, 19:47 — 70 subscribers29 Sept 2026, 20:22 — 70 subscribers29 Sept 2026, 19:4729 Sept 2026, 20:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69–71 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 20:2270no change
29 Sept 2026, 19:4770first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 16 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.7%
avg views ÷ 70 subscribers
Avg views / post
36.9
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
41.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held12 (16 September 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total443
Reactions total183
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
750
Videos
455
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54000921797439140826736.6%
custom 54540378193851947362513.7%
custom 54741286885534163691910.4%
custom 5352732357054963148179.29%
custom 5323561484641394945116.01%
custom 524900960123122469194.92%
custom 532331226486907844073.83%
custom 525620849899524062563.28%
custom 537990862947643822663.28%
custom 537778457487503521342.19%
custom 537730597807930906931.64%
custom 537994710808843992931.64%
custom 543384482018966512321.09%
custom 547415695373319012821.09%
custom 537759847394210431310.546%
custom 543393533662542947510.546%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
342
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 12 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vexraes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 September 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 19:11 UTC13 views3 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026

Накидываете, завтра буду разбирать и отвечать, чтобы не всё и сразу)

custom 54741569537331901282custom 54000921797439140821

29 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC20 views11 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53527323570549631484custom 53233122648690784402custom 52562084989952406251custom 53235614846413949451custom 53775984739421043131custom 54000921797439140821custom 54741286885534163691

29 Sept 2026, 17:51 UTC24 views12 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

Вижу много новеньких и хочется вам получше о себе рассказать, чтобы не сидеть без дела задать анонимный вопрос Знаю, есть что спросить. Знаю, спросите 🫦

custom 54000921797439140825custom 54741286885534163692custom 53233122648690784401custom 53235614846413949451custom 53527323570549631481custom 53773059780793090691custom 54540378193851947361

29 Sept 2026, 16:38 UTC29 views18 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

📸Раньше хотели сделать фото ярче, чётче, качественнее. А сейчас мы с помощью различных сторонних программ пытаемся сделать те фото, благодаря которым то время ощущается чем-то нереальным. И знаете, в этом есть своя атмосфера и душа 💋

custom 54000921797439140829custom 54741286885534163693custom 53799086294764382262custom 52490096012312246911custom 53527323570549631481custom 53777845748750352131custom 53799471080884399291

29 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC41 views22 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

Каждому нужно услышать эти слова. Помню в детстве мне не особо нравилась эта песня, но я не понимала смысла. Тогда жизнь была проще и цвета ярче 👻

custom 54000921797439140829custom 53233122648690784404custom 54540378193851947362custom 52562084989952406251custom 53235614846413949451custom 53527323570549631481custom 53773059780793090691custom 53777845748750352131

27 Sept 2026, 19:01 UTC50 views21 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

Говорят любовь загадка. Всегда ли появляются бабочки в животе? Из-за чего? Точно ли они должны быть или с человеком может быть просто хорошо и спокойно? Почему вас не может просто притягивать что-то неземное и необъяснимое 🖤🌟

custom 54000921797439140829custom 53527323570549631484custom 54540378193851947362custom 52490096012312246911custom 53235614846413949451custom 53777845748750352131custom 53799471080884399291custom 54339353366254294751

25 Sept 2026, 09:33 UTC50 views16 reactions30 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 [10/10] На столько классных романтичных комедий я ещё ни разу не смотрела. Очень классно передали атмосферу книги. Конец, конечно, не тот, что в книге, но суть осталась та же и во время просмотра улыбка не сходила с моего лица. Также в фильме обязательно показали все самые забавные и неловкие сцены, которые вызывали не кринж, а смех и смущение вместе с героями. В общем, если кто-то не хочет читать …

custom 54000921797439140826custom 53799086294764382263custom 53235614846413949452custom 54540378193851947362custom 53773059780793090691custom 54338448201896651231custom 54741286885534163691

23 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC38 views17 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

я кайфую она кайфует мы обе счастливы 😍

custom 54000921797439140828custom 54741286885534163694custom 54540378193851947362custom 52490096012312246911custom 53777845748750352131custom 53799471080884399291

22 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC42 views16 reactions100 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Удивительно, я писала о том, что хочу пересмотреть «Сумерки», чтобы поймать то самое настроение «хао-хао», и спустя год сходила на них в кино. 🤩 Это было вау, смотреть этот фильм на большом экране, когда в зале больше никого не было. Особенно, когда знаешь реплики персонажей наперед. 🖤Вышла из кино исключительно с положительными эмоциями. Кажется, настроение «хао-хао» поймано 🖤

custom 54000921797439140825custom 54540378193851947364custom 53527323570549631483custom 52562084989952406251custom 53235614846413949451custom 54338448201896651231custom 54741286885534163691

21 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC39 views17 reactions37 Starsread 29 September 2026
Video

😝 #life

custom 54540378193851947366custom 54000921797439140825custom 54741286885534163692custom 52490096012312246911custom 52562084989952406251custom 53235614846413949451custom 53527323570549631481

18 Sept 2026, 19:21 UTC47 views15 reactions67 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

meow 🌟🩷

custom 54540378193851947365custom 54000921797439140824custom 53235614846413949452custom 52490096012312246911custom 52562084989952406251custom 53527323570549631481custom 54741286885534163691

16 Sept 2026, 19:25 UTC50 views15 reactions101 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

у нас продолжаются гулянки по Москве 🍷 погода радует, солнце, ни облачка, тепло а какая красивая сегодня была луна… 🌙

custom 54000921797439140825custom 52490096012312246914custom 54741286885534163692custom 52562084989952406251custom 53235614846413949451custom 53527323570549631481custom 54540378193851947361

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @vexraes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vexraes” (@vexraes), 70 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vexraes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.