Harold Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 1.11 SOL ($100.26) 🔀 38 902.584 HAROLD 👤 9nnLbo...Exn8 | Txn ⬆️ Position: >1000% Up! 💲 HAROLD Price: $0.002577 💸 Market Cap $2 577 040 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events

Channel
Veve Gems 💎
@veveGemscall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
259subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002174478399 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @veveGemscall |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/veveGemscall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 259 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 267 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 267 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Bull Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 0.6931 SOL ($65.7) 🔀 10 674.736 BULL 👤 F3xmkT...wdH2 | Txn ⬆️ Position: 1% Up! 💸 Market Cap $6 154 172 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
Photo, posted without a caption
Hanta-Kun Buy! 🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠🦠 🔀 2.33 SOL ($216.24) 🔀 455 703.353 HANTA 👤 5hVPzg...3Eag | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $472 130 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
CA: HF3VMfGEcf8jVYrJbRLQAYMokx3iNR9QBT45c7F1pump https://dexscreener.com/solana/a6sdnbfcu4mcrr3lnjvbvc7b2epf3ubgxhaua5bfhf8x Gamble
SOL $UNEMPLOYABLE just launched! "Lacking the necessary skills, abilities, or qualities to get or keep a job, making someone unable to be hired." In its simplest form: NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR EMPLOYMENT. https://x.com/unemployedhq?s=21 https://t.me/unemployableportal 4ecvnw4tkiVegzvFsTS9QFPu3EiixRTfV8vRGzU4pump
$DOGMONEY just launched following BillyM2k (Dogecoin creator) tweet. Good branding and narrative. Just launched, low cap. Burnt LP and No tax. Degen. Dyor. https://t.me/dogmoneycoin https://x.com/billym2k/status/2049558932969177099?s=46 https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x6ff633367e33785fda3c6101ec891fdffa505e8f 0x5eBC9394F0ce3B64CBf0cB2eD69EDf7C7aB7bD9c
$NEILA (ETH) ELON MUSK: "Neil Armstrong, Neil A, spelled backwards is Alien. We went to the moon a few times. We didn't just go to the moon. We actually got a little bored and started playing golf on the moon. I literally did. Whacked golf ball on the moon." https://x.com/cb_doge/status/2039543239875936726?s=46 https://x.com/FirstNEILA https://t.me/FirstNEILA https://neila.vip/ 0x05a7599bDbB5024fE82f265510ddE032…
JUST IN: Western Union to launch Solana-based stablecoin next month. @WatcherGuru
ETH $Clawd good launch watch entries! Clawd, the retro 8-bit pixel crab mascot of Claude Code, became the first crustacean to greet developers right in their terminal. Clawd’s fun design was inspired by the playful pun “Claude, meet…Claw’d,”🦀 https://t.me/clawdmascot https://x.com/clawdmascot https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x7152143e67700dcf2251318a37e0703287824c07 0x46d03Ff0FE7E539804678530eA5D6289a76C1ADe
SOL ELUN MUSK just launched. BURNIE meta. Gr2whP1Tz8EviULH6hjanqrPV8FHdzyPPuYyhYtxpump elun musk most rich entroprenur in teh wurld mek telsa electric cars and spacesex https://t.me/officialelunmusk_sol https://elunmusk.fun
Watching this rato dev that did 40m is back on eth after a long wait with another Matt furies drop Sub 50k https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x7a8489da5bebdf186619e68054a94fe438e6545f
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @veveGemscall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@trendingssol · 144,6943 postsWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 626,9533 postsclawdmascot
@clawdmascot · 41 postelienmusksol
@elienmusksol · 21 postETH Price
@eth_price · 15,8571 postFIRST ALIEN | $NEILA
@FirstNEILA · 131 post$HAROLD CTO PORTAL
@RealHaroldCoin · 2,5641 postThe golden turtle
@ThegoldenturtleSOl · 751 postUNEMPLOYABLE
@unemployableportal · 301 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@veveGemscall named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Veve Gems 💎” (@veveGemscall), 259 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/veveGemscall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.