Channel
@vetvrach_dentist
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
353subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002676172585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vetvrach_dentist |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vetvrach_dentist |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 353 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:45 | 346 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 343 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 334 | +8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 326 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 321 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
121 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86 | 71.1% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 11.6% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 6.61% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 6.61% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.826% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Приходил большой песик нашей коллеги @drmeowcoola к нам на санацию. Жалобы: запах изо рта и покраснение дёсен. При осмотре: гиперплазия десны, которая образует ложные карманы. Под десной скапливалась шерсть, зубные отложения, в том числе сформировавшийся зубной камень (наиболее выражено в области нижних резцов со стороны языка) Дентальный рентген: без патологий. Провели полную санацию ротовой полости, удалили ра…
🔥9❤8
Пациент: 6 лет, вес 5 кг. Из анамнеза: любит грызть палки. При первичном визуальном осмотре состояние ротовой полости выглядело относительно благополучно: отмечались незначительные сколы зубов и зубные отложения. Однако после осмотра под анестезией и проведения дентальной рентгенографии картина изменилась. По данным диагностики выявлено: пульпит двух резцов, периапикальные изменения (воспаление) в области 4 централ…
👍7🔥1
Какое маленьковое😍 Ко мне такие маленькие пациенты не приходят, рановато, поэтому смотрим на пациентов коллег
❤16🔥2💘1
Пациенту 1 годик, микро Йорк. Зубы в 2 ряда, постоянные и временные, часть постоянных зубов не смогло вылезти, часть зубов из-за нехватки места выросло как попало, коронки некоторых зубов 308 и 408 выросли буквой «г» Работать в таком маленьком ротике достаточно тяжело, пациент весит 1,2кг. Пациент очень милый, уже проснулся, покушал, спал на руках у всех сотрудников по очереди😅
😱6❤3🔥2
Это мой сыночка корзиночка 😍 Сегодня делала ему санацию ротовой полости и дентальный рентген. Он не в восторге. Если бы он выбирал сам, то лежал бы на солнечном балконе, а не вот это всё 😅 На первом фото просыпается и вытягивает лапочки 😍
❤18👍1
Йорк, 7 лет. На плановой вакцинации терапевт посоветовал владельцам показать собаку стоматологу. Без жалоб, без явной боли. И вот что мы видим на осмотре под наркозом и на дентальном рентгене. - Множество поражённых зубов - Патологическая подвижность (зубы держатся буквально «на честном слове») - Периапикальные воспаления с гнойным содержимым ⚠️ Чем это грозило: - На нижней челюсти — высокий риск перелома. Тонкая ч…
❤16👏4😱2
В случае рецидива стоматита или ухудшения аппетита в будущем показано расширение объема экстракции до субтотальной (удаление всех премоляров и моляров), что является стандартом лечения хронического стоматита у кошек.
❤11
Котик с положительным калицивирозом У пациента отмечалось снижение аппетита с эпизодами полного отказа от еды в течение некоторого времени Осмотр: Область 108 и 208 - выраженный контактный стоматит,болезненность при прикосновении. Гингивит. Каудальный стоматит (поражение области небных дужек, щечно-глоточной зоны) Дентальный рентген: Вариант нормы. Учитывая отсутствие рентген.изменений, с владельцами приняли реше…
❤14
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @vetvrach_dentist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ветеринарный стоматолог” (@vetvrach_dentist), 353 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vetvrach_dentist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.