Channel
@vesel_i
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
77subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001627472461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vesel_i |
| Description | здесь живёт шиза, драма и любовь |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vesel_i |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 77 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 77 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (31 May 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 406 |
| Reactions total | 120 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
260 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5334581168132100184 | 65 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5332360047269809910 | 60 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5334883091448105096 | 42 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5262570977648221362 | 17 | 6.54% | |
| custom 5262644266970160549 | 16 | 6.15% | |
| custom 5452044928790076408 | 15 | 5.77% | |
| custom 5454003429582078927 | 14 | 5.38% | |
| custom 5332295725839587140 | 10 | 3.85% | |
| custom 5262913565714585182 | 8 | 3.08% | |
| custom 5262745885896381260 | 5 | 1.92% | |
| custom 5332703949596171281 | 4 | 1.54% | |
| custom 5373190561891126654 | 3 | 1.15% | |
| custom 5283240293011857480 | 1 | 0.385% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
вместо Тео мне ромашки дарит Любимка!!!!!!!! не завидуйте, у меня всё классно!!!!!! ❤️ 🤩 ❤️
custom 53345811681321001849custom 53323600472698099107custom 53348830914481050967custom 52626442669701605491custom 52627458858963812601
наконец-то нахожусь в своём лучшем комбо: в отпуске на море и в овуляции 🤩
custom 533458116813210018412custom 53348830914481050968custom 53323600472698099106custom 52625709776482213623custom 52626442669701605493custom 52629135657145851822
как-то давно не было подборок, исправляюсь 🤩
custom 533458116813210018412custom 533236004726980991010custom 53348830914481050967custom 52626442669701605492
если ваши рабочие смены с Любимками не заканчиваются ТАК, то не просите меня выходить на смену….. я откажусь….. а вообще, что хочется сказать… я в любимой полочке уже почти 1,5 годика, и я её безумно люблю, как и безумно люблю каждого ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️! спасибо, что дали мне шанс на новую жизнь с правильными людьми ❤️
custom 533236004726980991010custom 53345811681321001849custom 53348830914481050967custom 52626442669701605493custom 52625709776482213621
я — мазохистка, которая начала не так давно читать «спазм» (кто не шарит, это достаточно популярный фанфик по пейрингу Теодор Нотт/Гермиона Грейнджер. да, Малфой уже не так мне интересен, как этот неогранённый алмаз в роли Нотта. думаю, это очевидно, что я дико дурею не один месяц по очередному несуществующему персонажу…) 🤩 п.с.: я не знаю сюжета, так как не люблю читать описания во славу матери-интриганки… за сего…
custom 52629135657145851826custom 54520449287900764086custom 52626442669701605495custom 52627458858963812604custom 53323600472698099103
бооооойссссс доооонт крррааааай вот такую бандуру сегодня пересадила! честно, я беспонятия, что это за растение, мне просто нравится ухаживать за своим «микросадом» в комнате…ей стало на подоконнике очень тесно, поэтому… или история о том, как я люблю сидеть дома вместе с рокстаром и как ощущается кризис 25 лет…. ⬜: зацените, кстати, зелёные трусы на мне моего воображаемого парня 🤩 и загарчик, кстати, тоже 🤩
custom 54520449287900764089custom 52625709776482213628custom 53348830914481050967custom 53323600472698099104custom 52626442669701605491
мы как вещи в фамилии..💚🩷
custom 53323600472698099107custom 53345811681321001847custom 53348830914481050966custom 52625709776482213625custom 52626442669701605491custom 52832402930118574801
всё, поспамила немного и хватит 👀 хорошего по-немногу кстати, из хорошего — я наконец-то дописываю очень личный пост! прикиньте? поэтому преданные фанаты в лице десяти человек ждите его где-то на этой неделе (он придёт с первым лучом солнца на пятый день с востока) 🕺 а ненавистники могут готовиться набирать цифры психбольницы на телефончике 🤩
custom 545400342958207892710custom 53323600472698099109custom 53345811681321001849custom 53731905618911266543
сексуальное давление чувствуете? я вот да 🩵 я обожаю эту серию, и обожаю Грея, и обожаю абсолютно каждый его костюм (особенно ЭТОТ), который, конечно, на нём долго не продержится, потому что он постоянно раздевается, ахахахах
custom 53345811681321001847custom 53322957258395871406custom 53323600472698099104
я не забыла про «хвост феи», который начала смотреть пересматривать в какой-то там n-раз ещё в конце февраля 🩵 (я пересматривала его точно больше 10 раз….в поисках новых смыслов…) п.с.: если «наруто» для меня ощущается как личная мотивация «никогда не сдаваться», то «хвост феи» — это моя тихая гавань с друзьями, приколами и вечным приключением, хе-хе на неделе наконец-то дошла до арки с магическими играми! и, о бож…
custom 53322957258395871404custom 53327039495961712814custom 54540034295820789274
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @vesel_i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 495,184 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“записки весел” (@vesel_i), 77 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vesel_i.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.