Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Игра в долгую

@verylongplay

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

258subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003730064994
TypeChannel
Username@verylongplay
DescriptionБлаго семьи — мера всех вещей. Пишу о деньгах, рисках и решениях, которые работают на долгой дистанции. Для тех, кому служение семье - не пустой звук Связаться https://t.me/verylongplay?direct
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 5 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/verylongplay

Growth

2586 Aug 2026, 11:20 — 258 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:01 — 258 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 11:207 Aug 2026, 02:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 257–259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:01258no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:20258first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.2%
avg views ÷ 258 subscribers
Avg views / post
137
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held19 (5 March 202618 July 2026)
Views total412
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7639.6%
4221.9%
🔥2412.5%
💯199.90%
🤝126.25%
😁73.65%
👌52.60%
🤯42.08%
🤔31.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC111 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uparta

Про передачу опыта детям Типичная фантазия богатеющих людей про образование детей - это делегирование. В смысле, отправить молодняк в частный сад, потом в частную школу, потом в частный вуз, и на выходе через 22-25 лет получить амбициозного все знающего красавчика в костюме, который заткнет папку за пояс в делах, получив тайные знания элиты в элитных аудиториях из элитных учебников. Дети элиты, правда, косячат во вс

5👍3

18 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC118 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uparta

Альтернативы есть: проектные лагеря по интересам, онлайн-курсы или обучающие видео практиков, научные наборы для экспериментов, конструкторы, хакатоны, спортивные игры и скаутинг. Это лучше чем ничего, но не совсем реальная жизнь, все равно. Но точно лучше школ, даже очень хороших, потому что, внезапно, деньги вы зарабатываете так, как принято на работе, а не так, как учили в школе. А цель - дать профессию, приносящу

3👍2

14 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC183 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @honestmarketingPhoto

Наткнулся на интересный график того, как поменялся мир после наступления «дофаминовый культуры»: • Раньше все хотели заниматься спортом, затем начали его смотреть, а теперь — просто делать ставки • Ещё 10-20 лет назад почти все ходили по магазинам, затем начали заказывать на маркетплейсах, а теперь покупки происходят через TikTok Shop и его аналоги • Вдумчивое чтение газет сменилось срочными новостями, а сейчас вмес

🤝5🤯4

12 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC193 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вы как предпочитаете?

  1. Почитать побольше77%
  2. Послушать подольше30%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC191 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Привет всем, я тут третью неделю собираю материал, и уже одних только тезисов набралось на 7-8 стр. Если описать все в письменном видео, получится натуральный монстр-текст страниц на 20. Либо можно набубнить голосом в формате подкаста

4

25 Jun 2026, 18:18 UTC277 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @luka_ebkovPhoto

Наткнулся на исследование — там методично считали, как российские медиа показывают семью. И вот что вышло) Семья в телевизоре — это почти всегда пара с одним ребенком, где мама измотана и виновата, а папа либо пропал, либо скандалит. Многодетные семьи — почти невидимки, а если и появляются, то как история про бедность или подвиг При этом в эфире спокойно живет «Беременна в 16», где школьница с залетом — это просто

👌5🤝2

27 May 2026, 19:57 UTC363 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ехал давеча с коллегой-товарищем на электричке, и вот он, будучи подвыпимши, начал говорить о том, как меня уважает. Дескать, как мне это всё удается, как я это все вывожу – непонятно ему. Для контекста – с начала года у меня случились: - Приемка квартиры в новостройке; - Начат ремонт; - Получено два повышения на работе, готовится почва для третьего; - Воспитываю ребенка; - Долгая поездка в другой город Ну и всякая

👍101🤔1

24 May 2026, 19:05 UTC331 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @antonvolkovPhoto

Я считаю, что понятие богатства тесно связано со свободой. Чем человек свободнее и сувереннее, т.е. не зависит от чужой воли и внешних факторов, тем он богаче. • Свободен ли топ-чиновник из команды губернатора? Или его положение сильно зависит от дуновения сверху, в т.ч. на вышестоящее начальство? • Свободен ли "белый воротничок", зарабатывающий 3 млн в месяц, но тратящий их все на отдых и шмотки своей жене-оленеез

4👍3🔥1

1 May 2026, 13:31 UTC378 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁75

15 Apr 2026, 17:46 UTC452 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @upartaPhoto

Навыки нужные для успеха в будущем Тревожные родители тревожатся о будущем своих ненаглядных детей, которым предстоит жить в мире с кучей стариков, роботов и странных технологий. И бесконечно спорят, что же важнее для будущего успеха отпрысков, которые вообще не хотят никакого успеха: адаптивность, умение учиться, эмоциальный интеллект, критическое мышление, гуманитарные или технические навыки, умение обращаться с н

12🤔2🔥1

29 Mar 2026, 14:30 UTC587 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Анастасия в чате канала подкинула нажористую тему для обсуждения, за что ей передаем большой рахмет. [ГЛУМЁЖ УДАЛЕН] [ТОЧНЕЕ ОТЛОЖЕН ДО ПОРЫ, ДО ВРЕМЕНИ] Богатые предпочитают жениться на богатых, вы представляете? А на бедных жениться не хотят даже бедные. Удивительно, правда? Шок-контент: богатые, умные, красивые и здоровые особи более привлекательны для противоположного пола, чем бедные, тупые, страшные и больные

🔥6👍3💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @verylongplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTCAnonymous Poll61 voters

Вы как предпочитаете?

  1. Почитать побольше77%
  2. Послушать подольше30%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,088,636 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Игра в долгую” (@verylongplay), 258 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/verylongplay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.