Channel
@verybigsad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
202subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001811175514 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @verybigsad |
| Description | я миша хромов middle devops engineer @ yandex cloud github github.com/verybigsad contact me: @Mikhail_Khromov |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/verybigsad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 202 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 202 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
417 reactions across 16 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 142 | 34.1% | |
| 🫡 | 60 | 14.4% | |
| 😢 | 30 | 7.19% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 6.71% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 4.56% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 4.56% | |
| 💩 | 18 | 4.32% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 4.32% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 4.32% | |
| 😭 | 17 | 4.08% | |
| custom 5355027720721931381 | 13 | 3.12% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 1.68% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 1.68% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 1.44% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 1.20% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.959% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.48% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 417reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2024 to 27 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
за время моего молчания в этом канале: - мне исполнилось 20 лет - я устроился в Яндекс Клауд - я неотчислился из ВУЗа (!) про Яндекс довольно много впечатлений, постараюсь расписать как со сбером - через пару недель/месяц
❤29🐳7🔥4👀1👍1💩1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1💩1
срочно ищу инвесторов в ООО "ВАЙБ КОДИНГ СЕКЬЮРИТИ"
😁16👍3💩2
Photo, posted without a caption
😢18😁3❤2💩1
🙃мне кажется или в ру айти сейчас начался фриз найма по всей индустрии Точно знаю, что в Касперском (в некоторых блоках, как минимум) фриз найма есть, в екоммерсе Сбера (самокат/мегамаркет) фриз найма есть Слышал, что в топовых финтехах начнется в ближайшем будущем + это на фоне сотен уволенных из вк ранее в этом году сотрудников никогда не думал, что увижу такое в РФ учитывая дефицит айтишников, но, видимо, ключев…
😭17😢4❤3💔3💩2🫡2custom 53550277207219313812🔥1
🧠 Накидал прототип бота, который должен быть психологом и уметь в КПТ Ключевой функционал такой: ты записываешь ГС, где ты можешь выговориться по поводу сегодняшнего дня/тяжелой ситуации/whatever, а бот выцепит ключевые моменты и спросит тебя про них. Мне такое помогает с самоанализом - думаю я такой не один. Во время создания промптов почувствовал себя настоящим промпт инженером 😎 Еще, кажется, моя работа в сбере т…
❤🔥11👍5custom 53550277207219313814💩1
🎈 Сделал бота на serverless функциях Яндекс Клауда для ваших фоток котят из МИСИСа Канал с фотками: @misis_cats Сам бот: @misis_cats_bot (он очень медленный при первом запуске, т.к. серверлесс функция долго загружается 👀) Прикольный экспириенс прототипирования чего-то за 30 минут с чатгпт и готовыми инструментами облачных платформ Как будто, такое может иметь смысл только в тех случаях, если вам нужно хостить бота…
❤12custom 53550277207219313815❤🔥4💩1
🗓 Календарь Последние пару недель осознал, как выглядят люди, которые пользуются приложениями календарей. Очень много раз пытался начать ими пользовался, но каждый раз спотыкался о тот факт, что мне оно не надо - не так много разных вещей в моей жизни происходило в любой выбранный момент, чтобы записывать их куда-то. Это изменилось с текущего месяца 😣 С сентября у меня началось: 1. 💕 Смена деятельности в Сбере Теп…
❤36👍13🥰4🌚1👨💻1💩1custom 53550277207219313811
Мой стрик с сентября 2022 года, где я не пропустил ни одной недели без коммита на гитхабе, канул в лету после работоустройства. Жаль 😭 Красная точка - момент устройства в Сбер
🫡20😢6💔4❤1💩1custom 53550277207219313811
Все что нужно админу для счастья...
❤10🥰5😢2💩1
С днем пожара в моем ВУЗе 😭
🫡19💩1
⚡️⚡️⚡️ В Университете МИСИС произошло возгорание. Комментарий от проректора по безопасности Игоря Магомедовича Исаева: На данный момент задымление в Доме культуры НИТУ МИСИС локализовано. Людей в помещении не было. Никто не пострадал.
💯6🔥4🥰3💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @verybigsad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mikhail Khromov” (@verybigsad), 202 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/verybigsad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.