Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 59 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 128–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Oct 2026, 22:16
130
-1
28 Sept 2026, 05:40
131
+2
8 Sept 2026, 00:58
129
+1
30 Aug 2026, 19:17
128
-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:43
130
+2
9 Aug 2026, 18:00
128
no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:47
128
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
84 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
42
50.0%
custom 5303323212195591913
13
15.5%
custom 5382080572963189976
10
11.9%
custom 5420293206233347522
10
11.9%
custom 5427263650391947728
9
10.7%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
всем, кто переживал, что я пропала после шагов…
я жива!
это оказалось легче, чем я думала, так что в следующий раз поднимем планку 🤣
следующий раз точно будет, планирую в выходной, чтобы было удобнее. сообщу число позднее!
а пока фото красивенной Москвы!
ребята!!
в эту пятницу (7.08) зовем вас с собой — ставить рекорды или кайфово гулять. 💔
зову всех!
даже если мы с вами никогда не виделись и не тренировались!
летс гоууу
@vera_vrrr писать мне ✉️
ничего не могу с собой сделать. мои выходные прошли снова дома у родителей, и я забываю напрочь доставать телефон и снимать. 🍀
а еще вчера мы спонтанно поехали в Термоленд, и это было тааак классно!
после таких насыщенных выходных без интернета мне хочется одного — РАБОТАТЬ.
люблю жить! 💔
мы с Дашулькой сегодня эстетик-герлс! ✨
прошло лет сто, но я все же побывала на гэс-2,
в целом норм, но ничего оСоБеНнОгО, чтобы возвращаться сюда снова и снова я не нашла… такая я избалованная!!
но погуляли отлично!
ребята, я рискую жизнью ради эксперимента, НЕ ПОВТОРЯТЬ!
я съела тонну ягод и хочу посмотреть, что будет…
буду держать вас в курсе.
(пока что ничего, кроме блаженного чувства я не испытываю.)
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @verulyaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“verulyaaa” (@verulyaaa), 130 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/verulyaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.