Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Das Bewusstsein 333 33 3

@vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,921subscribers

+109 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001329549573
TypeChannel
Username@vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung
DescriptionTelegramm: https://t.me/vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung * Umzug: https://lbry.tv/@Wahrheitsbewegung:b Unser YouTube Kanal: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSk9Y_nwoRtJHI1MLIW8fvQ Telegramm: @ScharfschuetzenBewegung1
Created16 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ScharfschuetzenBewegung1/591224 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC@vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung/92302 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@ScharfschuetzenBewegung1/591244 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC@vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung/92304 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@ScharfschuetzenBewegung1/591275 Aug 2026, 01:42 UTC@vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung/92307 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 01:42 UTC1.00under a minute
@anhangerdeslichtes333111000gott/118094 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC@vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung/92304 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@anhangerdeslichtes333111000gott/118125 Aug 2026, 01:42 UTC@vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung/92307 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 01:42 UTC1.00under a minute
@naturheilkundeleon/50365 Aug 2026, 01:41 UTC@vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung/92307 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 01:42 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ScharfschuetzenBewegung120 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (146)
@anhangerdeslichtes333111000gott14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (86)
@naturheilkundeleon12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@naturheilkundeleon (102)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @ScharfschuetzenBewegung1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

14,80114,93614,868.56 August 2026 — 14,812 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,809 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,805 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,801 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,936 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,928 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,921 subscribers14,9216 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,781–14,956 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:4414,921-7
11 Aug 2026, 04:5714,928-8
10 Aug 2026, 06:2014,936+135
9 Aug 2026, 07:5114,801-4
8 Aug 2026, 06:3514,805-4
7 Aug 2026, 03:2614,809-3
6 Aug 2026, 06:3714,812first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.37%
avg views ÷ 14,921 subscribers
Avg views / post
205
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
72
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held72 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total14,740
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,430
Videos
1,110
Links
2,260

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 41m
Average length
28m 40s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC40 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleon

Kurz gesagt zu dem Wahnsinn was man Fledermaus-Virus nennt u.s.w Ja. Wenn wir es rein symbolisch und nicht als biologische Tatsache betrachten, könnte man die Grafik so auf 333 verdichten: 🔺 333 – symbolische Lesart 3 – Eintritt: Etwas Fremdes tritt in ein bestehendes System ein. 3 – Umwandlung: Das System reagiert darauf und verändert seinen Zustand. 3 – Rückkopplung: Die Reaktion erzeugt weitere Veränderungen i

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

12 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC113 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleon

„Bietet antimikrobiellen Schutz ohne Energieverschwendung“ 🟡 Einzelne Aspekte haben einen realen biologischen Hintergrund, aber die Darstellung ist stark vereinfachend. Fledermäuse besitzen tatsächlich besondere Eigenschaften ihres Immunsystems und zeigen bei bestimmten Virusinfektionen teilweise ungewöhnliche Immunreaktionen. Auch der Zusammenhang zwischen Fledermäusen, Interferonsystemen, Entzündung und Energiehaus

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

12 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC80 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleon

🔴 Falsch bzw. stark irreführend. Ein korrekt durchgeführter Nasenabstrich kann unangenehm sein und gelegentlich kleinere Blutungen verursachen. Daraus folgt aber kein etablierter direkter Zugang von SARS-CoV-2 in den Blutkreislauf. Die Formulierung suggeriert einen gefährlichen Übertragungsweg, für den die Grafik keinen wissenschaftlichen Nachweis liefert. 2. ENDOTHELIALER EINTRITT UND SYSTEMISCHE VERBREITUNG „Eintr

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

12 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC83 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleon

Batwomen and Batman Ja. Ich habe die Grafik jetzt inhaltlich mit dem aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Stand abgeglichen. Wichtig vorweg: Die Grafik vermischt einige reale biologische Vorgänge mit nicht belegten Schlussfolgerungen. Die WHO/SAGO-Bewertung von 2025 kommt beispielsweise zu dem Ergebnis, dass die verfügbare Evidenz eher für einen zoonotischen Ursprung spricht, während ein Laborunfall nicht ausgeschlossen wer

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

11 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC179 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleonPhoto

⚠️ Dein Körper speichert alles, was er nicht loswerden kann. Und das ist mehr, als du denkst. 🔴 Plastikflaschen. 🔴 Beschichtete Pfannen. 🔴 Leitungswasser. 🔴 Dein Deo. 🔴 Die Luft in deiner Wohnung. 🔴 Der Kassenbon, den du angefasst hast. 🔴 usw. Jeden Tag. Seit Jahren. 🏋️‍♀️ Dein Körper ist ein Entgiftungsprofi. Aber er wurde für eine andere Welt gebaut. Nicht für 80.000 Chemikalien, die heute im Umlauf sind. Ich

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

11 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC149 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleonVideo

⚡️ Die Kraft in deinem Körper, die stärker ist als jedes Medikament Und die meiste Zeit nutzt du sie nicht. Was daraus entsteht, ist gewaltig Dein Körper hat die Macht, aus dem kleinsten Trigger eine Reaktion auszulösen, die in deinem Organismus stärker wirken kann als jedes Medikament, das du von außen zuführst. Ein Beispiel: Ein einziger bitterer Tropfen auf der Zunge, und dein Körper fährt von ganz allein die V

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

11 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC263 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleon

Kaspersky Also, wir würden das jetzt erstmal so bewerten, da wir ja jahrelang Kaspersky sind und jetzt erstmal gerade richtig überprüft haben, haben wir hier zum Beispiel eine interessante Sache. Das ist diese Datenleck-Geschichte, wenn es um Accounts geht. Wenn was da irgendwie, ja, sagen wir mal, geklaut worden ist, das ist uns persönlich wichtig, ne, wenn irgendwelche Accounts geknackt werden, das ist persönlich

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

11 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC278 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleon

Mandel-Behandlung Körper und Gesicht Ja. Ich habe die aktuellen alverde-Rezepturen bei dm gezielt danach verglichen, wie weit vorne Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis Oil (Mandelöl) in der INCI-Liste steht. Je weiter vorne, desto höher ist normalerweise der relative Anteil – eine genaue Prozentangabe lässt sich daraus aber nicht ableiten. 🥇 Die interessantesten Treffer Mein Favorit ist damit die alverde Gesichtscreme Natura

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

10 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC300 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleonVoice message

So nebenbei gesagt zu Amazon... 333

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

10 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC324 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleon

Nachweis bitte !? Sonst klappt das nicht was sie hier anstreben. 3. Aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht gibt es keine Beweise für Adam und Eva als die ersten Menschen oder für eine biologische Abstammung von nur zwei Personen. Die Evolutionstheorie und Genetik zeigen, dass sich der Mensch aus einer Population von Vorfahren entwickelt hat. Es gibt zwar die Begriffe "Y-chromosomaler Adam" und "Mitochondriale Eva", aber dies

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

10 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC285 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturheilkundeleon

Mischung Gottes Hier ist die Zusammenfassung aller gezeigten pflanzlichen Wirkstoffe, ihrer Quellen und Eigenschaften aus dem Video: Resveratrol: Gewonnen aus der Weinrebe (Vitis vinifera), besonders konzentriert in der Schale der Traube. Urolithin A (Vorstufen): Vorhanden in Granatäpfeln (Punica granatum). Astragalosid IV: Gewonnen aus der Astragaluswurzel / Tragant (Astragalus membranaceus). Anthocyane: Dunkelrote

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

10 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC272 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐕 Trend in deutschen Küchen: Immer weniger Halterinnen stehen noch am Herd Frisch kochen für den Hund – der Wunsch ist da, die Zeit fehlt. Besonders wenn der Vierbeiner empfindlich reagiert, wählerisch ist oder schon Unverträglichkeiten zeigte, bleibt die Sorge: reicht das Futter aus dem Regal wirklich? 🌿 FAVLY Nassfutter setzt genau hier an: Monoprotein-Rezepturen mit nur einer Fleischquelle, getreide- und glutenf

Signed Leon 5G Router Bäng 5G Router

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 231,687 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Das Bewusstsein 333 33 3” (@vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung), 14,921 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vereinigteWahrheitsbewegung.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.