Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ver.di in Jena - Infokanal

Channel

ver.di in Jena - Infokanal

@verdiinjena

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

160subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525212369
TypeChannel
Username@verdiinjena
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/verdiinjena

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15416015711 August 2026 — 154 subscribers11 August 2026 — 154 subscribers31 August 2026 — 155 subscribers9 September 2026 — 156 subscribers4 October 2026 — 160 subscribers11 August 20264 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 54 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 153–161 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 14:17160+4
9 Sept 2026, 20:55156+1
31 Aug 2026, 04:38155+1
11 Aug 2026, 09:01154no change
11 Aug 2026, 08:49154first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1037.0%
🔥1037.0%
👍518.5%
❤‍🔥27.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC47 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Was denkst du?

  1. A83%
  2. B8%
  3. C0%
  4. D8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC48 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

👋 Frage der Woche #2 "Durch das Bürgergeld lohnt sich Arbeiten kaum noch." Solche Aussagen hört man immer wieder. Dabei wird oft vergessen, dass viele Menschen arbeiten gehen und trotzdem auf staatliche Unterstützung angewiesen sind. Z.B. weil Löhne und Arbeitsbedingungen so miserabel sind. 🤔 Wie viele Menschen müssen ihr Gehalt mit Grundsicherung aufstocken? 👇 Stimmt jetzt ab! 💡 Die Auflösung gibt's wieder Ende…

10 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC54 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @verdiErfurtPhoto

‼️Einladung zur Mitgliederversammlung Migration‼️ Wir wollen in Thüringen einen eigenen ver.di Migrationsausschuss wählen! Du hast Lust deine Themen einzubringen und mitzubestimmen? Dann komm vorbei zur Mitgliederversammlung Migration! 📅 Montag, 24.08.2026 🕔 Ab 16:30 - ca. 18:00 Uhr 📍 filler, Schillerstr. 44, 99096 Erfurt (Hinterhaus) Melde dich bitte kurz unter [email protected] an. 🥳Wir freuen uns auf dich!

7 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC84 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

👋 Auflösung der Frage der Woche Die richtige Antwort ist D: 54,7 Milliarden Stunden. 2023 wurde in Deutschland so viel gearbeitet wie noch nie seit der Wiedervereinigung. 📈 Quelle: https://www.diw.de/de/diw_01.c.899502.de/in_deutschland_wird_so_viel_gearbeitet_wie_noch_nie_____durc___e_wochenarbeitszeit_geht_seit_wiedervereinigung_aber_zurueck.html Die Berechnungen stammen vom Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsf…

❤2

5 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC89 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Was denkst du?

  1. A21%
  2. B21%
  3. C5%
  4. D53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC83 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

👋 Sommerzeit = Quizzeit! Am 26.9.2026 gehen wir gemeinsam gegen die Angriffe auf den Sozialstaat und auf unsere Beschäftigtenrechte in Erfurt auf die Straße! ✊ 🌐 Infos zum bundesweiten Aktionstag: https://kurzlinks.de/fkvf Damit die Sommermonate bis dahin nicht ganz so ruhig werden, haben wir uns etwas überlegt. 😎 📅 In den nächsten 6 Wochen gibt es zu jedem Wochenbeginn eine neue „Frage der Woche“ rund um Arbeit, …

❤1

3 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC302 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🗓️ Aktionstag am 26. September Erfurt, 10 Uhr ✊ Wir machen bundesweit gemeinsam mit dem DGB und seinen Mitgliedsgewerkschaften mobil: Am 26. September gehen wir zusammen auf die Straße und demonstrieren für eine solidarisch finanzierte soziale Gesellschaft – Sei dabei! Denn ob Gesundheit, Rente, Pflege, Wohngeld, unsere Rechte am Arbeitsplatz: Es zeigt sich, dass die Koalition überall nach dem Rasenmäherprinzip kür…

3 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC80 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @verdiErfurtPhoto

Frauen bringen wichtige Perspektiven in Betriebs- und Personalratsgremien ein, oft mit großem Engagement und viel Verantwortung. Doch wie erlebt ihr eure Arbeit im Gremium? Welche Herausforderungen begegnen euch? Was hat sich bewährt? Und wie können wir uns gegenseitig stärken? All das wollen wir besprechen beim Vernetzungstreffen für Frauen in Thüringer Betriebs- und Personalräten des ver.di Bezirksfrauenrats Thürin…

7 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC152 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Kurzfrsitiger Veranstaltungshinweis Deine Meinung zur Rentenreform an Prof. Übelmesser Die Jenaer Finanzwissenschaftlerin Prof. Dr. Silke Übelmesser stellt am 📆Dienstag, 7. Juli, die Reformvorschläge der Alterssicherungskommission vor. Die Professorin der Universität Jena war selbst Mitglied der Kommission, die Ende Juni 33 Empfehlungen zur Zukunft der Altersvorsorge an die Bundesregierung übergeben hat. Im Mittelp…

👍1

6 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC137 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Infoveranstaltung Nr. 2 🚫 unkürzbar - Aktuelle Kürzungen und Angriffe auf den Sozialstaat und was wir tun können 📆 25. August 2026 ⏰ 17 Uhr 🚩 Haus auf der Mauer (Jena, Johannisplatz 25) - Großer Saal Angriffe auf den Sozialstaat - Wo? Was bedeutet das? Aktueller Stand: Wir haben zusammengetragen, wo aktuell gekürzt werden soll und wer betroffen ist. Wir stellen Euch auch vor, wie weit die Kürzungen schon sind und…

❤1

2 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC≈1,490 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔥Kürzungen auf unseren Rücken? Nicht mit uns! - Komm zum nächsten Treffen des frischen #unkürzbar Bündnisses in Jena! Unter dem Deckmantel des „Wirtschaftswachstums“ 📈 greift die Merz-Regierung mit der „Agenda 2030“ unseren Sozialstaat an. Und auch die Kommunen sind dramatisch unterfinanziert, gespart wird dann dort, wo es uns in Jena am meisten trifft! ❌ Mehr für Gesundheitsversorgung zahlen ❌ Zerstörung hart erk…

❤3🔥3👍1

1 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC126 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Deshalb wollen wir zusammenstehen mit unseren migrantischen und queeren Kolleginnen und Kollegen, weil sie von der AfD zum Feindbild gemacht werden. Wir stehen zusammen! Vielfältig, solidarisch und weltoffen.🌍 Als Teil des Bündnisses Zusammenstehen rufen wir zu Protesten gegen die AfD auf! Es gibt daher am Samstag, 4. Juli, jeweils einen Demonstrationszug um 6 Uhr und 10 Uhr vom Hauptbahnhof/Willy-Brandt-Platz zur …

🔥3❤2👍2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @verdiinjena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Was denkst du?

  1. A83%
  2. B8%
  3. C0%
  4. D8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

Was denkst du?

  1. A21%
  2. B21%
  3. C5%
  4. D53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ver.di in Jena - Infokanal” (@verdiinjena), 160 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/verdiinjena.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.