Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Venvyl

Channel

Venvyl

@venvyl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

571subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002082800299
TypeChannel
Username@venvyl
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/venvyl

Growth

5715995857 August 2026 — 599 subscribers8 August 2026 — 599 subscribers16 August 2026 — 591 subscribers23 August 2026 — 581 subscribers30 August 2026 — 571 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 567–603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 13:09571-10
23 Aug 2026, 14:38581-10
16 Aug 2026, 06:04591-8
8 Aug 2026, 03:15599no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:54599first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

511 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌭14829.0%
❤‍🔥12624.7%
custom 54093647263731858886612.9%
custom 54294371228870480106212.1%
custom 5249165272320857391509.78%
custom 5400239540071850952173.33%
custom 5415616931740805563112.15%
custom 541388684160456578471.37%
custom 536200218496993863050.978%
🙊50.978%
40.783%
30.587%
🙉30.587%
🎉10.196%
💅10.196%
🗿10.196%
😭10.196%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 511reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 2 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Mar 2026, 09:29 UTC903 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я ждал триквел Стикса 9 лет, мне было 17 когда вышел Шардс Оф Даркнесс, мне не иронично было интересно че там с Хеледрин. А игра получилась пиздец душная, как и девятый Резак, что там, что в Стиксе вместо того, чтобы заниматься чем-то интересным, бегал кварц собирал, blades of peak

🌭15custom 54294371228870480107custom 54093647263731858883

12 Feb 2026, 11:40 UTC922 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

КРИИИИИИИИИИИИИК (сонник мой мод запостил)

❤‍🔥18🌭9🎉1

21 Jan 2026, 14:59 UTC963 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ВЫШЕЛ ВЫШЕЛ ВЫШЕЛ

❤‍🔥19custom 54093647263731858887🌭5custom 54294371228870480101

7 Jan 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,070 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Яблятькарлик

❤‍🔥20custom 54093647263731858887custom 54294371228870480104🌭211

19 Dec 2025, 11:05 UTC≈1,130 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Интернет хочет сказать, что этот мужик должен откинуться от какой-то хуйни на шее? После ласплагаса в жопе, столкновений с активным боо, при условии что в девятке он будет кататься по городу, на который скинули ядерную бомбу, именно темное пятнышко беспокоит фандом?

custom 54294371228870480109custom 54093647263731858884🌭2

21 Nov 2025, 14:14 UTC≈1,320 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🌭24custom 54156169317408055636custom 52491652723208573913custom 54294371228870480101

18 Nov 2025, 07:54 UTC≈1,280 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если вам когда-нибудь предложат прочитать Метаморфозы Ф. Кафки, посоветуйте в ответ Метаморфозы не Ф. Кафки Не гуглите это, и у нейронки не спрашивайте

🌭14custom 52491652723208573915custom 54138868416045657841custom 54294371228870480101

12 Nov 2025, 10:13 UTC≈1,220 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нихуя себе

🌭14custom 542943712288704801052custom 52491652723208573912custom 53620021849699386301

11 Nov 2025, 07:07 UTC≈1,130 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я люблю когда блондинки падают, а тыквы делают бум

custom 542943712288704801012custom 54093647263731858881custom 54138868416045657841

11 Nov 2025, 07:07 UTC≈1,180 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

больше реакций, пожалуйста😛 коммишка крутая для @Venvyl #art

custom 540023954007185095212🌭9❤‍🔥6custom 540936472637318588841custom 52491652723208573911custom 53620021849699386301custom 54138868416045657841

28 Oct 2025, 19:42 UTC≈1,120 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я в 30

custom 540936472637318588816🌭3custom 54002395400718509521custom 54138868416045657841custom 54156169317408055631custom 54294371228870480101

26 Oct 2025, 20:29 UTC≈1,110 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 542943712288704801010custom 54093647263731858882🌭1custom 52491652723208573911custom 54138868416045657841custom 54156169317408055631

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @venvyl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,029,043 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Venvyl” (@venvyl), 571 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/venvyl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.