Ребята, я вот думаю, создать сетку по Технолайку — историю про лагерь🤩 Медленно, но верно я делаю все это. Но у меня есть один вопрос — как сделать бота для анкет и тп?☺
🤔2

Channel
@venus_pisklya_dinax
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
29subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004312822509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @venus_pisklya_dinax |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 19 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/venus_pisklya_dinax |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 29 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 31 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 32 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:39 | 31 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 33 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 33 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
66 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 39.4% | |
| custom 5409023658725247135 | 17 | 25.8% | |
| custom 5332781718568992976 | 8 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5325562149127338998 | 5 | 7.58% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5274241619267175430 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| custom 5452053931041510920 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| custom 5384180859215579708 | 1 | 1.52% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребята, я вот думаю, создать сетку по Технолайку — историю про лагерь🤩 Медленно, но верно я делаю все это. Но у меня есть один вопрос — как сделать бота для анкет и тп?☺
🤔2
🤩🤩🤩 💙💙 🤩🤩🤩 💙💙 💙💙 😏 — Хобана. Видео с Мишуткк😍 Дальше на очереди Аннет 🌟 🤩🔠🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🤩 😀😀 : — #ПВЛ #Видео
custom 54090236587252471353
💭🌺🌺🌺🌺 💭💭💭 💭🌺🌺🌺🌺 💭💭💭 🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺💭💭💭 🌺🌺🌺🌺 🙂🙂🙂: — Я сделала наконец этот аниматик, потратив на него около 5-ти часов. Надеюсь вам понравится😳 🍬🍬 : — #Технолайк #gacha
custom 54090236587252471356
!SPOILERS! Анимка мне вообще не нравится, а все из-за графиков😭
❤1
Буду делать по порядку, поэтому ещё один голос и пойду делать вам видео с капиннетами👍
Тааксс, я собираюсь делать видео. У меня оч много идей, помогите выбрать пж😀😀
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤩🤩🤩 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🤩🤩🤩 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🤩🤩🤩 😖🤨: — Вспоминаю про существование этого фд и кидаю вам видос по Черниевам🌟 ⭐️ Чернобыль × Киев ⭐️ 🎭 : — #ПВЛ #Видео
custom 53255621491273389981custom 53841808592155797081custom 54520539310415109201
Yarara🙂 Завтра займусь первой частью видео🥹
❤4custom 53327817185689929761
!SPOILERS! Мда, давненько меня здесь не было🙂 Сейчас херачу видео, хочу нарисовать ещё весь клип ярара, ну так, от делать нехуй😇 Насчет фф!: я начала писать новый фф по вирусу в технолайке(у меня фантазии нет на новые идеи), насчет "Билет в один конец" я бесспонятия, когда выйдет прода. Постараюсь написать в ближайшие дни😁 Просто у меня пропало вдохновение, да и проблемы небольшие в личной жизни, которые подавляю…
❤2custom 52742416192671754301custom 54090236587252471351
💬 У тебя новое сообщение! мне кажется это аушка отчасти похожа на alien stage? Я каждый раз вспоминаю о AS и мне на ум приходит ваш фик. Это прелесть ↩️ Свайпни для ответа. Впервые слышу про такое, но вы меня заинтересовали. Обязательно посмотрю🤭
custom 53327817185689929761
Моя маленькая бедненькая Анечка😥 Как же ж мне ее жалко💔 А так, да, есть что-то такое. Ребят, сорри, что пропала на целых 2 дня.. Мне просто готовиться надо. Как никак, следующий учебный год — 9. А экзамены я выбрала херовые🚬
custom 54520539310415109201
💬 У тебя новое сообщение! Нашла это видео. Мне кажется подходит к вашему фф. Ну на данный момент Неанон Просто Рио ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
❤2custom 53255621491273389981
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @venus_pisklya_dinax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Тааксс, я собираюсь делать видео. У меня оч много идей, помогите выбрать пж😀😀
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хранилище всяких дум” (@venus_pisklya_dinax), 29 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/venus_pisklya_dinax.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.