Posted without readable text
👍1🔥1

Channel
@velter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,001subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001741376103 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @velter @velter_tech |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/velter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 1,001 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 1,000 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,002 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 1,003 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 1,006 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 1,006 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:10 | 1,005 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 1,003 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 1,003 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (16 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,010 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 27.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 27.3% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 20.5% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 2.27% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 2.27% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
👍1🔥1
Posted without readable text
🔥3👍2❤1
Posted without readable text
👍2
🤖 Больше половины интернет-трафика уже приходится на нейросети и ботов. По данным Cloudflare с 29 мая по 4 июня 2026 года трафик ботов и ИИ-агентов составил 57,5% всех запросов к HTML-контенту. Люди впервые оказались в меньшинстве — на них пришлось только 42,5%. ⬆️ Смотрите на видео, как работают телефонные фермы — стеллажи из сотен смартфонов под управлением одного терминала. Именно они накручивают фейковые просмо…
👍1😱1
🤯 Почему реклама будто читает ваши мысли? Дело не только в «рекламной прослушке». Тема недавнего разговора вдруг всплывает в рекламе — и первая мысль, что телефон вас подслушивает. Такие технологии действительно существуют. Но сбор и анализ цифрового следа устроены куда глубже обычной прослушки. ‣ Как работают cookies и рекламные пиксели; ‣ Что такое «отпечаток» вашего браузера; ‣ Как устроены аукционы данных, кото…
👀1
↗️ Стартап сделал умные очки приватными и заработал миллиард. Производители в погоне за технологиями забыли про конфиденциальность. Meta* Ray-Ban и десятки подражателей снимают на встроенные камеры всё вокруг. Собеседники нервничают — неуютно говорить, когда разговор может быть записан на видео. Стартап Even Realities пошёл против тренда и убрал камеру. Очки G2 сохранили ключевые смарт-функции: перевод разговоров «…
👍3👀2
👋 Новая версия Shielding Tester уже в App Store! Это необходимое приложение для каждого пользователя экранирующих чехлов и других устройств с клеткой Фарадея. За секунды измеряет уровень сигнала сотовой связи, Wi-Fi и Bluetooth и проверяет эффективность экранирования. Что нового? ‣ Добавили функцию «Пинг устройства» — новый тест, который работает без интернета. Приложение подключается к другому устройству напрямую …
🔥2👍1👏1
😎 Что взять в отпуск? На отдыхе цифровая безопасность важна не меньше красивого загара. Берите с собой устройства и аксессуары Velter с протестированной технологией защиты от киберугроз — и будьте спокойны за свои гаджеты в любой точке мира. ‣ Чехлы Фарадея. ‣ EDC-сумки и водонепроницаемые рюкзаки с клеткой Фарадея. ‣ Кардхолдер RFID-защитой. ‣ Гаджеты для быстрой зарядки. 👋 Читайте нас также в 💬Макс | 💙VK | 📝Дзен
❤6👏1
👋 Новый чехол Фарадея для криминалистики и форензики Представляем экранирующий чехол-контейнер для безопасного хранения, транспортировки и первичной экспертизы электронных устройств. Он переводит устройство в офлайн и блокирует каналы дистанционного доступа — защищает от удалённого стирания данных, отслеживания и взлома электроники. Прозрачное экранирующее окно позволяет визуально идентифицировать устройство и счит…
🔥3👍1🤡1🆒1
☀️ Летняя распродажа продолжается! Скидки тают — только сегодня и завтра -15% на чехлы Фарадея, EDC-сумки и рюкзаки, аксессуары и гаджеты. ‣ Экранирующий чехол Прайм; ‣ Чехол Фарадея для ноутбука; ‣ Противоугонный чехол для автоключа; ‣ Сумка-слинг с чехлом Фарадея; ‣ Водо/радиогерметичный рюкзак Фарадея; ‣ Сумка-кроссбоди для цифровой приватности; ‣ Водонепроницаемый рюкзак с клеткой Фарадея; ‣ Адаптер питания 65 …
🔥3
👀 «Буду смотреть в стену» — реакция британских подростков на скорый запрет соцсетей. Премьер-министр Кир Стармер объявил, что ещё до Рождества проведёт через парламент закон, закрывающий доступ к соцсетям детям до 16 лет. По его словам, страна «идёт дальше любого государства в мире», чтобы «вернуть детям детство». Под запрет попадут TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat, X и другие соцсети. Подросткам запретят вести трансляции…
😁2👀1
👋 EDC-сумки — умная экипировка на каждый день. ‣ Сумка-слинг — свежий дизайн и продуманный органайзер с функциями цифровой защиты. Встроенный кардхолдер с RFID-защитой блокирует считывание карт и пропусков, а съёмный чехол Фарадея защитит смартфон от взлома и отслеживания. ‣ Сумка-кроссбоди — классический аксессуар для ношения через плечо или на поясе. Внутри — чехол Фарадея сразу на два смартфона, а снаружи есть п…
❤2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @velter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 386,238 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Velter” (@velter), 1,001 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/velter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.