Channel
@velgashtazad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001881106647 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @velgashtazad |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/velgashtazad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 91 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 92 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 92 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (20 February 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 81 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
135 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 75 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 23.0% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 10.4% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 6.67% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 4.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
زمانی برای فهم بهتر مسائل، قضاوتهای درستتر و همدلی بیشتر تلاش میکردم از منابع مختلف و آدمهای متفاوت بخوانم. خب، تجربهای بود، با ضررها و منفعتهایش. اما بعد از مدتی به این دلیل که ذهنم بسیار شلوغ و درگیر و واگرا شده بود، برای بهتر شدن اوضاع و تمرکز بیشتر تصمیم گرفتم از آن انبوه آن یکی دوتایی را دنبال کنم که فهمیده بودم نگاه چند جانبهای دارند، با مطالعهاند، قضاوتهایشان به حقیقت اتفاقات نزدیکتر است و هرچقدر هم…
❤6👍3
بچهها روزی چند بار زمین میخورند و گریه میکنند و روزی چند بار زیر لب میگم: این رنج اولین قدم است، ز خار حادثه تیه وجود خالی نیست. #از_مادری
❤10
شاید یک حقیقت تلخ این باشد که ما بیش از آنکه فکر کنیم، فکر کرده میشویم. اصلا ما فاعل اندیشهایم یا محل عبور اندیشهها؟ #ندانمهای_بسیار
👍3
دو آموزه ای که از کلاس تفکر انتقادی عمیقا درگیرم کرده اینها هستند: مدام علیه اندیشههایتان شورش کنید. اندک تمرین این جمله، دنیایی جدید و البته پرتلاطمی را برایم خلق کرده. دنیایی که اگرچه خوب و سرشار از یافتههای نو است، اما بیقرارم کرده. دنیایی که جذابیتش با نیاز به آرامش در تقابل است. نکتهی دیگر اینکه تعصب آنجایی به وجود میآید که تفکرات و باورهایتان را به هویت خود میچسبانید. اگر بخواهم صادقانه بگویم من با تلخ…
❤5👍2
اگر از دسته مخالفان و منتقدان هستیم یا بودهایم: میشود با دیدن این جمعیت حاضر در تشییع آقای خامنهای گفت: پول میگیرند و میآیند. بهشان وام میدهند. کارمندان به اجبار میروند و توجیهات ساده انگارانهای از این دست... میشود هم برای یاد گرفتن پرسید این جمعیت به چه میاندیشند که ما شاید از آن غافلیم؟ ما که را از دست دادیم؟ و یا در سیل جمعیت متواضعانه پرسش و کنجکاوی کرد، شاید از این رهگذر بشود جهانبینی جدیدی یافت. ب…
❤7👍5👎3
جنگ فقط بیرون نبود. جنگ درون ما هم اتفاق افتاد. چیزهایی درونمان کوبیده شد. فرو ریخت. گویی بسیار چیزها که برایمان ارزشمند بودند رنگ باختند. دارم از نبرد بین بودن و نمودن حرف می زنم. بین حقیقتی که از آن عادتهای مندرس بیرون زده و عقایدی که سالها به آن تکیه کرده بودم. دارم از آن ابتذالی حرف میزنم که به آن دچار بودم. بعضی از نوشته های گذشته ام دچار چنین ابتذالیست. نوشته هایی که گویی شهوت دیده شدن در آنها بیشتر از شوق ح…
❤6🕊4
Have you seen my son? #world_cup_2026 @asedemad
❤7😢2
بیتوجهی به دانش و تجربهی بشری بعد از انتشار یادداشتِ «دلایلی برای این روزها»، گفتگوهایی با بعضی از دوستانم داشتم. مخصوصاً اینجا منظورم کسانی است که خود را مدافع حملهی آمریکا و اسرائیل میدانستند. اگر بخواهم باورشان را دقیقتر بیان کنم این است: «ما موافق ادامه پیدا کردن حملات اسرائیل و آمریکا هستیم به این امید که جمهوری اسلامی سقوط کند» در مقابل من دلایل مختلفی را علیه این دیدگاه، در یادداشتم فهرست کردم، با لینک…
اگر داغ دل بود، ما دیدهایم اگر خون دل بود ما خوردهایم اگر دل دلیل است ، آوردهایم اگر داغ شرط است ما بردهایم اگر دشنه ی دشمنان ، گردنیم اگر خنجر دوستان ، گردهایم گواهی بخواهید:اینک گواه همین زخم هایی که نشمردهایم 💔🖤🤍
❤3😢1
پراکنده نویسی این روزها #جنگ_نوشته
❤2😢2
هجده اسفند تلگرامم که وصل شد روایت آدمهایی که تونسته بودن وصل بشن رو از جنگ خوندم. ما که الان تهران یا شهرهای در معرض، نیستیم اصلا درکی از سیاهی جنگ چنان که در جریانه نداریم. ما اینجا به روزمرگی مشغولیم (بهتره بگم سعی میکنیم باشیم، و چون صدای بمب و موشک نمیشنویم شدنیست) و بیشتر نگران کار از دست رفته و خونه و آیندمونیم، ولی اون فشار روانی مستقیم زیر صداها و انفجارهارو نمیفهمیم. روایت دوستام از جنگ رو میخونم یا …
❤4😢2
ایران تو بمان❤
❤8😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @velgashtazad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ولگشت آزاد” (@velgashtazad), 91 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/velgashtazad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.