Channel
@enterprise_facilitation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
528subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001050099494 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enterprise_facilitation |
| Created | Between 1 March 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enterprise_facilitation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 528 | +22 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:10 | 506 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 505 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 505 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,410 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
«حاشیهنشینهای علوماجتماعی» زمانی که تصمیم گرفتم پایاننامهام را با روش مردمنگاری بنویسم، به توصیهٔ استاد عزیزم شروع به خواندن مردمنگاریهایی که توسط دیگران نوشته شده بود کردم. دوران شیرین و دلانگیزی بود. چند مردمنگاری از خارجیهایی که به ایران آمدهاند و در برهههای مختلف زمانی از ایران نوشتهاند خواندم. یکی از یکی از اساتید گروه مردمشناسی، یکی از آن یک نفری که معروف بود که دانشجویان خواستار جذبش بودند و جذ…
«ببینم جوراباتو!» چند روز پیش از ذوق خریدن این جورابهای اختاپوسی با چهرهٔ عصبانی این شخصیت نامحبوب باب اسفنجی، شوخیای نوشتم که این جوراب برای روزهایی است که اعصاب ندارم. در همین دو سه روز این شوخی را از افراد مختلف شنیدم که در اولین لحظات دیدار با خنده میگفتند: جوراباتو ببینم! با اینکه دو روز از این سه روز حداقل در اول صبح شایستهٔ پوشیدن جوراب اختاپوسی بود اما بخاطر اینکه باید در جلساتی شرکت میکردم آن را نپوشید…
«آیا این مسئله شخصی است؟» مدتی قبل، همسر یکی از فعالان اجتماعی متنی افشاگرانه را، دربارهٔ روند خیانت همسرش در صفحهٔ اینستاگرامش منتشر کرد و ساعتی بعد آن را پاک کرد. آنچه این متن را مهم میکند نه فقط توصیف اتفاقی است که بین آن زن و همسرش افتاده بلکه اشاره به زمینهای است که در آن ماجرا رخ دادهاست. در متن بیان شده بود که این اتفاق در محیط کاری، در طی سفرهای کاری و با امکانات سازمان مردمنهاد محل فعالیت و با یکی از …
این جورابم خریدم برای روزایی که اعصاب ندارم. 🥹😁 احتمالا به زودی پاره پوره بشه 😂😂
«صنایعدستی در خدمت نابرابری یا راهی برای نفی آن» صبح این توئیت را خواندم: در مورد این نابرابری و تبعیض اقتصادی بین دختر و پسر در خانواده، روایتی در مورد دختران قالیباف میخوندم خیلی تلخ بود... ازشون پرسیدن چرا هنر قالیبافی رو به نابودیست؟ گفتند چه بهتر، خلاصهی تاریخ فرش ایرانی اینست :«دختران بافتند، پدران فروختند، پسران خرج کردند...» بعد دیدم چه مثال خوبی از یک موضوع که ما در این کشور با انواع روشهای اقتصادی و هنر…
اعلام رسمی خروج از برزخ! میگویند کوهنوردی در تاریکی شب از کوه سقوط کرده بود و معلق در میان زمین و هوا آویزان به طنابش مانده بود. صدایی یا حسی به او میگفت طنابت را پاره کن اما پاره کردن طناب راهکار معقولی به نظر نمیرسید پس تسلیم صدا نشد و مقاومت کرد. صبح در حالی پیدایش کردند که بسیار نزدیک به سطح زمین معلق در هوا یخ زده بود. داشتم به تجربهٔ ذهنی چند ماه گذشتهام فکر میکردم که یادم به این داستان افتاد. اما نه دقی…
اگر پستها رو میخونید، درباره متنهای مشترک با هوش مصنوعی به این سوال جواب بدید:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
فقط پنج دقیقه یک روز صبح، همهٔ ساعتهای شهر پنج دقیقه عقب رفتند. مردم ساعتهایشان را با هم مقایسه کردند. بعضی گفتند باتری ساعتها ضعیف شده، بعضی گفتند حتماً اشکالی در شبکه پیش آمده است. فقط پیرزنی که هر روز روی نیمکت میدان مینشست، آرام گفت: «نه... ساعتها عقب نرفتهاند. چیزی دیگر پنج دقیقه جلو افتاده است.» کسی حرفش را نفهمید. شب، درست وسط میدان، درختی رویید. نه کسی آن را کاشته بود و نه کسی دیده بود از کجا آمده است…
حواسم به این مسابقه بود. ولی متاسفانه به ده تا نرسید فورواردها که بشه یه جایزه. اونا که فوروارد کردن اگه تخفیف خوب براشون جذابیت داره بگن، حالا که به جایزه نرسید تخفیف بدیم بهشون.
این پست لینکش مشکل داشت اصلاحش کردم. چون تا الان توی واتساپ بوده فروششون، کانال تلگرامشون نوپاست.
راهی برای یاری رساندن یک گروه خوب در هرمزگان احتمالا بسیاری از مردم ایران، با تکرار نام سیریک در اخبار متوجه همجواری این شهرستانِ استان هرمزگان با تنگهٔ هرمز و آسیب دیدنش از حملات شدهاند. برای من اما نام سیریک به یک گروه اجتماعی کار درست به نام «مکران برای کودکان» گره خورده. گروهی که چند سال است به همت جمعی از جوانان منطقه تشکیل شده که تلاش میکنند منطقهشان را جایی بهتر برای کودکان بکنند. برای مربیهای کودک امکا…
من که در بندم کجا، میدان آزادی کجا کاش راه خانهات اینقدر طولانی نبود دلتنگم
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enterprise_facilitation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اگر پستها رو میخونید، درباره متنهای مشترک با هوش مصنوعی به این سوال جواب بدید:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 225,084 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کار برای زندگی | الهام مراد” (@enterprise_facilitation), 528 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enterprise_facilitation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.