Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⚖️ Maître de Araújo-Recchia | Avocat

@vdar_avocat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,872subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001188712194
TypeChannel
Username@vdar_avocat
DescriptionMaître Virginie de Araújo-Recchia, avocat, France "et cognoscetis veritatem et veritas liberabit vos" https://dar-avocats.com/ - Organisation Nationale Éthique Santé Transparence (O.N.E.S.T) - International Court of Public Opinion - Grand Jury
Created11 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vdar_avocat

Growth

16,87216,90816,8906 August 2026 — 16,908 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,908 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,905 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,898 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,891 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,889 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,880 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,877 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,872 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,867–16,913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:4716,872-5
12 Aug 2026, 17:5816,877-3
11 Aug 2026, 14:5216,880-9
10 Aug 2026, 12:3716,889-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:0316,891-7
8 Aug 2026, 15:1316,898-7
7 Aug 2026, 18:3616,905-3
6 Aug 2026, 16:2216,908no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5316,908first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 16,872 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,240
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held19 (29 April 202610 August 2026)
Views total29,700
Reactions total1,460
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 02:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
383
Videos
240
Links
1,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,661 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,13824.4%
🙏1,11824.0%
👍65514.1%
😡53611.5%
👏4118.82%
💯2615.60%
😱2044.38%
🔥1493.20%
😢1092.34%
🤯390.837%
🕊170.365%
🥰160.343%
30.064%
❤‍🔥20.043%
🤝20.043%
😘10.021%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,661reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC≈3,680 views140 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Pour mémoire, publication du Cabinet en date du 20 avril 2022 : Abus de faiblesse et incitation des femmes enceintes ou allaitantes à participer à un essai clinique https://dar-avocats.com/2022/04/20/abus-de-faiblesse-et-incitation-des-femmes-enceintes-ou-allaitantes-a-participer-a-un-essai-clinique/ Aujourd'hui, voici la nouvelle concernant M. FAUCI : https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2026/08/10/senators-johnson

🔥76👍4519

8 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,820 views84 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @Dr_Astrid_StuckelbergerPhoto

LIVE STREAM WITH THE GREAT MALUE MONTCLAIRRE WHO WILL BE JOINED BY REINER (ON THE PHONE). All details here:👇 https://rumble.com/v7dpjgc-a-call-for-accountability.html

49👍31🥰2🙏2

1 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈4,840 views160 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @catholiquesdefrance

https://catholiquedefrance.fr/la-famille-et-la-conscience-face-a-letat-demiurge-me-virginie-de-araujo-recchia/

103👍50🥰5👏2

31 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈4,360 views250 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ONESTalternative

Une fausse protection, une vraie atteinte aux libertés. Notre association ne conteste pas la réalité des risques que les réseaux sociaux font courir aux adolescents : les liens avec les troubles du sommeil, l’anxiété ou l’exposition à des contenus dangereux sont réels et documentés. Ce que nous contestons, c’est la loi que le Parlement a votée pour y répondre. Nous demandons au Conseil constitutionnel de déclarer c

👏154👍5333🕊4💯3🙏2🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC≈2,940 views491 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @maitreXOFFICIEL

Pour une fois je vais vous parler un peu de moi : . Pendant que je vous écris, le conjoint de ma meilleure amie est en train de mourir d'un cancer du cerveau parti comme un feu de paille après je ne sais combien d'injections covid... il ne reste que peu de temps et même si je ne pourrai bien sûr jamais avoir de certitude, au fond de moi subsiste cette colère de n'avoir pas trouvé les mots qu'il faut pour prévenir, m

345💯62🙏51👍17👏8🤝2🥰2😢2

22 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTC≈4,800 views160 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ONESTalternativePhoto

📨 Droit à l'aide à mourir : l’ONEST adresse une contribution extérieure au Conseil constitutionnel. L'ONEST rappelle néanmoins sa position de fond concernant le texte relatif au droit à l’aide à mourir. https://onest-alternative.org/aide-a-mourir-lonest-demande-un-garde-fou-avant-lentree-en-vigueur-de-la-loi/

👍88🙏4715👏73

16 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC≈6,260 views175 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ONESTalternative

Me Virginie de Araújo-Recchia, dans la conférence du 14 juin 2026, expose les écrans à défendre que sont l’intimité familiale et l’intériorité humaine. Nous y voyons un réquisitoire qui, une fois déroulé, atteste de la culpabilité indéniable, incontestable d’un État possédé et démiurge. Il est à souhaiter que le constat de ce phénomène systémique permette aux complices de sortir du déni absolu et protecteur de leur

🙏97👏5121💯5🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC≈11,200 views265 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

LETTRE OFFICIELLE SUR LA PL RELATIVE AU DROIT À L'AIDE À MOURIR Monsieur le Premier ministre, le dernier mot vous appartient Extrait : Monsieur le Premier ministre, la sagesse ne commande pas de précipiter ce texte mais plutôt de l’abandonner. Donnez la priorité à ce que les Français réclament d’abord : l’accès universel aux soins palliatifs. Ne donnez pas le dernier mot à ceux qui veulent à tout prix administrer l

🙏167👏4336👍9🔥5😢3💯2

3 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC≈7,480 views157 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @DepechesCitoyennes

Nous publions ici un nouveau témoignage qui atteste des persécutions qui ont cours en France. Il n'est pas à regarder comme un fait divers mais plutôt comme l'arbre qui cache la forêt. https://depeches-citoyennes.com/articles/temoignage/la-protection-de-lenfance-bras-arme-de-la-police-politique-fuir-la-france

🙏115😱23👍10👏4😡32

27 Jun 2026, 07:43 UTC≈14,300 views315 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

TRANSGRESSION ET NON PAS ÉMANCIPATION Il est question d'un permis de tuer. Ce que l'on refuse de faire aux grands criminels on accepterait de le faire à des innocents. INVERSION TOTALE DES VALEURS

😡170💯45👍39🔥29🙏216🤯5

27 Jun 2026, 07:30 UTC≈9,710 views199 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

EN PLEINE LUMIÈRE : https://x.com/i/status/2070768119002304570 https://x.com/i/status/2070771130219078119

💯108🙏47🤯2210👏5🔥4😱2👍1

16 Jun 2026, 11:42 UTC≈10,200 views354 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

De Nuit blanche 2026 à Baile de Euro : neuf églises profanées, six fidèles en garde à vue pendant 44 heures, un archidiocèse silencieux, sinon complice. https://x.com/i/status/2066848243967791333

😡245😱46🔥20🙏14🤯8💯76😢5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vdar_avocat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 774,282 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚖️ Maître de Araújo-Recchia | Avocat” (@vdar_avocat), 16,872 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vdar_avocat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.