Channel
@vbbnav
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002408560704 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vbbnav |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vbbnav |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 21 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 18 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 19 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 17 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 15 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 15 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Для тех кто не знает: была одна хохлуша которая после 22-го переехала в Польшу. Там она села на мефедрон и начала работать закладчицей. Я с ней общался чуток летом 24-го, и у неё были определённые перверсии в плане мазохизма. Ну вот я и предложил ей этот прикол, а она взяла и сделала. 😁 Теперь я думаю что поляки тоже ëбнутые. Но на самом деле хохлуши.
Signed lunasi_boy
Я тебя найду блядь, пидарас ебанный. Ты у меня свои кишки жрать будешь, ты понял нахуй? Я знаю что ты тут, говно ты человечье.
Signed lunasi_boy
Почему-то такое обо мне думают очень давно, даже сам о себе такое думал(когда размышлял о книге Фаулза). Самое запомнившееся: 1.Л. думала что я правда был бы не против изнасиловать тян стулом(поляк я тогда не знал...). 2.Эля несколько раз сравнивала меня с Артёмом Исхаковым(это же сравнение было и у меня) который задушил свою сожительницу, несколько раз изнасиловал труп, написал предсмертную записку с описанием дейст…
Signed lunasi_boy
Похож ли я на человека способного на убийство или что-то в этом роде?
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed lunasi_boy
Это могли быть мы, но нас разделяет пространство от Лутугино до Ленинграда :( :( :( :(
Signed lunasi_boy
Заметки о погашоу-нойзе. Выдержка из моих сообщений разного времени разным людям о воздействии звука и нойза на человека. Нойз как жанр вытекает из литературы и эстетики модернизма. Прямой аналогией в литературе можно назвать творчество Кнута Гамсуна 1890-х годов, который «пытался изобразить своеобразную душевную жизнь, мистерии нервов в изголодавшемся теле» и «исследовал иррациональность душевной жизни современного…
Signed lunasi_boy
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed lunasi_boy
Жиза, очень понимаю эти проблемы.
Signed lunasi_boy
Чарльз Буковски крестил собаку. 😁
Signed lunasi_boy
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed lunasi_boy
Вслед за солнышком туда, где ещё никто не умирал...
Signed lunasi_boy
Хочу жить в декабре, пить сладкий чай, слушать «Армагеддон-попс» и видеть эротические сны.
Signed lunasi_boy
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vbbnav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Похож ли я на человека способного на убийство или что-то в этом роде?
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vbbnav named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Записки Оттомара Блюмфельда” (@vbbnav), 21 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vbbnav.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.