Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Важенков LIVE

@vazhenkovteam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

428subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001263618275
TypeChannel
Username@vazhenkovteam
Created13 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vazhenkovteam

Growth

427428427.56 August 2026 — 427 subscribers6 August 2026 — 427 subscribers13 August 2026 — 428 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 427–428 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:36428+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:30427no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:47427first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.6%
avg views ÷ 428 subscribers
Avg views / post
392
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,920
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2922.3%
👍2015.4%
💯1310.0%
😁118.46%
🤬118.46%
👏96.92%
😢86.15%
🔥53.85%
💊43.08%
🕊43.08%
🤷‍♂43.08%
🤝32.31%
🥱32.31%
😐21.54%
🤡21.54%
👎10.769%
😭10.769%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC38 viewsread 6 August 2026

Разбираем. По пунктам. 1. Власть всегда сушит явку. Чем ниже явка, тем лучше. Приводишь подконтрольных граждан на подконтрольное голосование. И вуаля... Излишний интерес к «выборам» и политике в целом власти не нужен в принципе. 2. Чем выше явка, тем сложнее сфальсифицировать «выборы». Это особенно понятно, когда ты являешься наблюдателем на выборах. За «молчунов» члены комиссии голосуют в первую очередь. 3. Уж что

6 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC36 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AndreyMalginItalia

Появление "Яблока" в бюллетене имеет для режима единственный смысл - повысить явку. Результат можно объявить любой, а вот пустые избирательные участки не скроешь. "Избиратели Яблока" - глупые статисты в очередном спектакле под названием "выборы".

3 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC112 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Уровень моих ожиданий от политических партий на так называемых выборах в так называемый законодательный орган и так крайне низкий, но даже ему соответствует только одна партия. ⛔️ Остановка войны, заморозка по линии соприкосновения, начало мирных переговоров. 🙅‍♂️ Снятие запретов и ограничений в интернете, отмена цензурных ограничений. 🆓 Свобода политзаключённым. Соответствует этому только «Яблоко». Остальные - люд

👍4💯3

31 Jul 2026, 06:46 UTC156 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Музыкальная пауза. 🎶 Монеточка 🫶 Послушайте её альбом «Молитвы. Анекдоты. Тосты.» Он весь прекрасен. 💞 Ну а пока песня «Монополия» из нового «Человека-паука».

👍52🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC225 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Совершенно случайно я познакомился в Германии с русскоговорящей компанией людей из Украины и России. Славянск, Москва, Днепр, Тверь, Одесса - всё в одном флаконе, на берегу Рейна. Разные возраста, разные судьбы, разные истории. Кто-то считается в Украине ухилянтом и незаконно бежал из страны, кто-то в России считается уголовником, а кто-то приехал в Германию работать незадолго до полномасштабного вторжения и вполне

10👍3🤝3

25 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC252 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Миюст России разместил на своем сайте карточки иноагентов с коротким описанием. Мне фотка не понравилась. Заменил на другое. Мне кажется так лучше. Что думаете?

😁103👏3

21 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC319 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пора начинать ругаться из-за выборов в Государственную думу РФ. 🤼 Я вот склоняюсь к тому, чтобы проголосовать за «Яблоко». Хотя окончательного решения ещё не принял. Не уверен, что они преодолеют 5-процентный барьер, но если пройдут 3%, уже хорошо. Пусть получат финансирование. Важно, чтобы в России хоть как-то сохранялись хоть какие-то антивоенные легальные структуры. Тезис о том, что мой голос в этом случае пере

👍6👏6🕊21🤡1😁1

21 Jul 2026, 16:10 UTC≈2,360 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Введение запрета на соцсети для детей не имеет никакого отношения к защите прав детей. Это демонтаж хоть какой-то приватности. И не важно, кто это делает: диктаторская путинская власть или либеральная европейская.

💯10🤡1

20 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC255 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Что то не хватает меня на телегу. В других соц сетях активен, а тут никак не складывается. 🥲

😢5🤷‍♂4😭1

19 Jun 2026, 14:07 UTC352 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Govorit_NeMoskva

❗️Минюст обновил реестр иноагентов На этой неделе в него вошли: 🔸Екатерина Кузнецова — художница; 🔸Ксения Фадеева — экс-координатор Штаба Навального из Томска; 🔸Петр Рузавин — журналист; А также проект помощи квир-людям «Сфера».

🤬2💊1😢1

5 Jun 2026, 14:19 UTC377 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Govorit_NeMoskva

Минюст пополнил перечень иноагентов На этой неделе в него включены: 🔸Станислав Андрейчук, экс-сопредседатель движения «Голос»; 🔸Виталий Солдатских, журналист-расследователь; 🔸Михаил Маглов, журналист-расследователь; 🔸Татьяна Фролова, блогер из США

🤬2😢2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vazhenkovteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,099,537 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Важенков LIVE” (@vazhenkovteam), 428 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vazhenkovteam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.