Channel
@vaysbergofficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
182subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001472208432 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vaysbergofficial |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vaysbergofficial |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 182 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 181 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 180 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 181 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 180 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 180 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
66 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 53.0% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 18.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 12.1% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 4.55% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 4.55% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если бы Одри Хепберн жила в Томске, она бы точно заглянула в УтроЗдесь. 13 августа в 18:00 пройдёт вечер, вдохновленный легендарной эстетикой Breakfast at Tiffany’s. Элегантность без снобизма. Красота без лишних слов. И атмосфера, в которой каждая женщина вспоминает, насколько она прекрасна. 🤍 Истории о стиле. 🌸 Цветочная эстетика. 🫖 Чайные традиции. 🍰 Авторские десерты. 🥂 Красивые коктейли. 📸 Фотографии, которые …
❤3
Деловой стиль 👩🏻💻 Принципы: 🔳элегантность 🔳аккуратность 🔳умеренность Подчёркивает качества: 🔲серьёзность 🔲надёжность/ стабильность 🔲авторитет/ статус 🔲деловые качества
🔥6
У меня есть такая услуга ЭТИКЕТ-ДЕВИЧНИК 🦋 ⠀ Отлично подходит для дня рождения и корпоративов 🙌🏻 ⠀ Как это выглядит: - Вы красивые собираетесь с подругами/ коллегами 💃🏻 - Выбираете ресторан/ кафе на свой вкус 🍝🦪🍣 - Вы получаете удовольствие от еды, общения и новые знания в непринуждённой атмосфере 💁🏻♀️ ⠀ Чему научитесь: - как красиво сидеть за столом и не устать - как правильно позвать официанта - куда класть тканев…
❤4
Классика 😁
😁7🙈1
«И руководителям напутствие —благодарите подчинённых за выполненный отчет, за хорошо проделанную работу, за удачную презентацию и т.п. ⠀ Иногда меня спрашивают: «Ну почему я должен говорить подчинённому «спасибо»? Я же плачу ему зарплату!» ⠀ Зарплата — это Ваша обязанность согласно Трудовому кодексу, а «спасибо» — это маленький красивый жест, который создаёт доброжелательную атмосферу в коллективе, выстраивает довери…
❤7👍2💯1
А здороваться кто будет? ⠀ Молодой человек рассказывает мне ситуацию: ⠀ Каждый раз, когда прихожу в пункт выдачи заказов известного маркетплейса, девушка-сотрудник никогда не здоровается и не прощается, поступаю также. ⠀ Задаёт вопрос, кто всё-таки должен здороваться первым? ⠀ Отвечаю, тот кто вошёл в помещение, тот и здоровается первым, значит, это ты. ⠀ Ответ не понравился 😅
😁5🙈2
Добрый вечер! Сегодня я в театре, без дресс-кода [не нарядная] 🙈 Так случается, когда у тебя появляется билет буквально за два часа до спектакля, и возможности переодеться нет 🙊 Что делать, если нет возможности поступать по правилам этикета? Поступать по правилам адекватности: например, идти в театр в том, в чём есть 💁🏻♀️ Но можно расчесать волосы и накрасить губы в уборной 😌 Помните, этикет не суровый критик и н…
❤5🤩1
О пользе визитных карточек 😎 Вчера состоялся бизнес-форум для предпринимателей нашей области. Кроме обсуждения важных вопросов, культурной программы и награждения была организована выставка, где Томские компании представили свою продукцию. Я и моя коллега, как представители центра «Мой бизнес», общались с каждым участником выставки, рассказывая, в том числе, об услугах, которые предоставляет наш центр. Не без уд…
❤7
Недавно была в гостях у салона «Наряжаться красиво» 🦋 Мы поговорили о том, какую роль играет одежда в соблюдении этикета и какие нюансы стоит учитывать при выборе образа для разных ситуаций. На моём примере разобрали несколько стильных комплектов — от деловых до повседневных 💃🏻 Я поделилась советами, а «Наряжаться красиво» показали, как внешний вид помогает подчеркнуть уважение к себе и окружающим 🙌🏻 Смотрите видео…
❤4
И раз я упомянула деловой форум, приглашаю всех желающих на главное событие для всех предпринимателей 🙌🏻 Ссылка на программу и регистрацию: https://t.me/frb_tomsk/5722
🤝3✍1
Как успехи?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вы на деловом форуме познакомились с коллегой из другого региона. О чём этикет не рекомендует говорить?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vaysbergofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как успехи?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вы на деловом форуме познакомились с коллегой из другого региона. О чём этикет не рекомендует говорить?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Когда вы говорите по телефону, чего лучше не делать?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
У вас в офисе гость, чем этикет не рекомендует угощать?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто первым подаёт руку для рукопожатия?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто первым здоровается устно?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вайсберг про этикет и не только 🖤” (@vaysbergofficial), 182 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaysbergofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.