29 Nov 2025, 05:16 UTC≈5,360 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video
Robotlar, suniiy intellekt insoniyat sivilizatsiyasiga tahdid soladi degan gaplar bilan boshimni qotirmanglar🤣🤣🤣 https://t.me/vatanparvarmas
🤣16❤2👍1💯1😁1
Channel
Ватанпарвармас
@vatanparvarmas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
176subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001151353309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vatanparvarmas |
| Description | Tarixiy materiallar, ijtimoiy-siyosiy voqealar bo‘yicha o‘ta shaxsiy fikrlar, kitob tavsiyasi, biroz yumor va boshqalar |
| Created | Between 1 November 2019 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vatanparvarmas |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 176 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 176 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 135
- Videos
- 27
- Links
- 194
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 5m 32s
- Average length
- 2m 46s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
80 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 37.5% | |
| 🤣 | 25 | 31.3% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 15.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 6.25% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 5.00% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.25% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2024 to 29 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
5 Oct 2025, 05:48 UTC827 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
https://www.gazeta.uz/uz/2025/10/04/soviet-repression/ Men 10 ta savoldan 10 tasiga to‘g‘ri javobni topdim. Bagʻoyat “Goʻzal”! “Millatimiz”ning “Oʻtgan kunlar”i haqida bilish, oʻz ajdodlarini “Chin sevish” mana bundoq boʻlibdi Siz ham "Test: Ularning qay biri 1938-yil 4-oktabrda otilgan?" testini yechib ko‘ring — ko‘ramiz, nechta savolga to‘g‘ri javob topa olarkinsiz?
👍4👏1
22 May 2025, 14:59 UTC≈1,050 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostonovminbariFile
Navbatdagi maqola. Aniqrog'i konferensiya to'plamida chiqqan yoziq. Qiziq bo'lsa, o'qib ko'ringlar. Ilk islom davri bilan qiziqadigan tadqiqotchilar uchun foydali deb o'ylayman.
👍2👏2🔥1
28 Apr 2025, 16:53 UTC≈8,710 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
"Bir kunda 13 kopeyka" yohud yuz yil avval xarajatlarni qanchasi "to'y-aza"ga ishlatilgan 2020-yilda yurtimizda global kambag‘allik o‘lchoviga ko‘ra, kunlik 5600 so‘m daromadi bor odam kambag‘al hisoblanmasligi haqida gapirilganda, aholini katta qismi buni qizg‘in muhokama qilib, aksariyat aholi buni keskin rad etdi. Lekin, hozir bu haqda emas. Bundan yuz yil avval aholi qancha daromad qilgan-u, qancha xarajat qilg…
👍6❤1👏1
12 Mar 2025, 18:49 UTC≈1,010 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Бундан 100 йил олдин амалдорлар қандай машинада юришган? Анча аввал «Газета.uz» йирик вазирлик ва идораларнинг хизмат автомашиналари паркини таҳлил қилиб, мамлакатнинг юқори мартабали амалдорлари қандай автомобиллардан фойдаланишини бўйича мақола эълон қилганди. Бу мақола кўплаб интернет ресурсларида кенг тарқалди ва муҳокама қилинганди ўшанда. Энди эса, Президент топшириғи билан давлат ҳокимияти органлари раҳбарла…
🔥4
12 Mar 2025, 18:39 UTC699 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kunuzofficialVideo
Malibu'дан Tahoe'гача – амалдорларнинг “иномарка”лари қандай автомобилга алмашди? Вазирлик ва идоралар президент топшириғига кўра хизмат автомобили сифатида Mercedes-Benz'лардан воз кечмоқда. Kun.uz республика даражасидаги ташкилотлар билан боғланиб, ижро органлари раҳбарлари бу топшириқ доирасида қандай автомобилга ўтаётгани билан қизиқди. 👉 https://kun.uz/kr/11226358 Kun.uz расмий канали
1 Mar 2025, 16:08 UTC965 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Марказий Осиёда 100 йил олдин тўйлар қандай ўтгани ҳақида Нурбек акам жуда яхши контент тайёрлади. Мен ҳам оз бўлса-да архив маълумотлари билан ёрдам берганимдан мамнунман. Кўринглар!
👍6❤1👏1
24 Feb 2025, 14:35 UTC796 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File
Шеп табриклар😁
🤣3
24 Feb 2025, 14:34 UTC745 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AsanovBeyondFormat
Нега бизни мақташмаяпти?
4 Feb 2025, 18:40 UTC930 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostonovminbari
Uzoq XIX asr. Bu nima degani? Odatda, bir asr yuz yillik davrni anglatishini bilamiz. Lekin tarix fanida bu qoidaga doim ham amal qilinmaydi. Ya'ni ayrim tadqiqotchilarni davrlashtirishda faqat yillarni emas, ma'lum bir voqealarni asos qilib oladi. Xuddi shunday XIX asr ham yuz yildan ko'p davom etgan, deydigan tadqiqotchilar ham bor. Masalan, uzoq XIX asr tushunchasi tarixchi Erik Xobsbaum tomonidan ilgari surilga…
👏7
16 Jan 2025, 14:50 UTC724 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostonovminbari
To'pqopi saroyi muzeyi arxivlarida A. Bennigsen va Sh. Lemercier-Quelquejay tomonidan topilgan hujjatlar orasida E. 7120 raqamli hujjat bor. Ushbu hujjat Sadorat tomonidan saroyga yuborilgan hisobot bo'lib, unda 1833-yilda Qo'qon xoni Muhammad Alixonning Istanbulga yuborgan elchilarining qabul marosimi hamda Qo'qon tavsifi haqida so'z boradi. Mamlakat ta'rifi haqidagi qismda bugungi katta Markaziy Osiyoni XIX asr bos…
👍1
22 Dec 2024, 18:34 UTC≈2,420 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Tarixiy manbalarda ham bunday "ziyoratgoh"lar ko‘p bo‘lgani haqida dalillar keltiriladi. Masalan, Muhammadhakimxonto‘raning "Muntaxab ut-tavorix" asarida 19-asrning birinchi yarmida Qo‘qon xonligida minglab "Mo‘yi muborak" (payg‘ambarimiz Muhammad s.a.v.ning mo‘ylari) ziyoratgohlari mavjud ekanini, biroq, aslida ularning hammasi pul ishlash niyatida ochilganini yozadi. Batafsil keyinroq yozaman. @vatanparvarmas
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @vatanparvarmas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 272,769 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ватанпарвармас” (@vatanparvarmas), 176 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vatanparvarmas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.